Verizon Says NO to Hollywood
![]() |
Written by Gene Quinn President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc. Patent Attorney, Reg. No. 44,294 Zies, Widerman & Malek E-mail | Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn Posted: Feb 7, 2008 @ 10:40 am
|
Recently Hollywood executives approached both AT&T and Verizon to seek their help in preventing piracy over their networks. According to a New York Times article, AT&T is working with the entertainment industry to figure out how to identify illegally copied material that is being transmitted over its broadband network. Verizon, on the other hand, said — NO — we are not going to be the police force for the entertainment industry online.
Tom Tauke, Verizon’s executive vice president for public affairs, gave three reasons for Verizon’s refusal to cooperate:
1) The slippery slope
Once you start going down the path of looking at the information going down the network, there are many that want you to play the role of policeman. Stop illegal gambling offshore. Stop pornography. Stop a whole array of other kinds of activities that some may think inappropriate.
2) It opens up potential liability for failing to block copyrighted work
When you look back at the history of copyright legislation, there has been an effort by Hollywood to pin the liability for copyright violations on the network that transmits the material. It is no secret they think we have deeper pockets than others and we are easy-to-find targets.
3) Privacy
Anything we do has to balance the need of copyright protection with the desire of customers for privacy.
Congratulations and thank you to Verizon for taking a stand and getting this one right. Networks should not be in the business of reviewing content and deciding what content is allowed to pass through. If the entertainment industry is allowed to get away with this then there will be other groups who seek to have other materials blocked. At first it would likely be things that are deemed morally offensive, such as pornography, but do we really want the most sensitive among us defining what is pornographic? Do we really want the sensibilities of others telling us what we can and cannot access? I don’t think this is a good idea and I applaud Verizon. Well done!

About the Author
![]() |
Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc. US Patent Attorney (Reg. No. 44,294) Zies, Widerman & Malek B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Rutgers University J.D., Franklin Pierce Law Center L.L.M. in Intellectual Property, Franklin Pierce Law Center Send me an e-mail |
Gene Quinn is a US Patent Attorney, law professor and the founder of IPWatchdog.com. He is also a principal lecturer in the top patent bar review course in the nation, which helps aspiring patent attorneys and patent agents prepare themselves to pass the patent bar exam. Known by many as “The IPWatchdog,” Gene started the widely popular intellectual property website IPWatchdog.com in 1999, and since that time the site has had millions of unique visitors. Gene has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the LA Times, CNN Money, NPR and various other newspapers and magazines worldwide. He represents individuals, small businesses and start-up corporations. As an electrical engineer with a computer engineering focus his specialty is electronic and computer devices, Internet applications, software and business methods.


















One other aspect that Verizon failed to mention, but I am sure they definitely considered is the cost of acting as the Hollywood Cops! I suspect the manpower necessary to do what Hollywood asked is outrageous, and who knows what Hollywood offered to pay for the service, if anything at all. Not that anyone condones piracy, but Hollywood needs to protect themselves, and not have someone else play bad cop. Well done Verizon.