<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obscure Patent: Clothes Protection System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/10/04/obscure-patent-clothes-protection-system/id=214/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/10/04/obscure-patent-clothes-protection-system/id=214/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: markmalek</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/10/04/obscure-patent-clothes-protection-system/id=214/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>markmalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=214#comment-156</guid>
		<description>WOW - at least there wasn&#039;t an attorney&#039;s name attached to it.  I would hat to see an inventor have paid an attorney to put that together.  And thank goodness for Figure 2.  It may have been a bit difficult to understand this invention without the cross section!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW &#8211; at least there wasn&#8217;t an attorney&#8217;s name attached to it.  I would hat to see an inventor have paid an attorney to put that together.  And thank goodness for Figure 2.  It may have been a bit difficult to understand this invention without the cross section!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

