Today's Date: May 21, 2012 Search | Home | Contact | Services | Patent Attorney | Patent Search | Provisional Patent Application | Patent Application | Software Patent | Confidentiality Agreements
MORE LIVE LOCATIONS:

New York, NY ~ May 16 - 20, 2012
Houston, TX ~ June 6 - 10, 2012
San Francisco, CA ~ June 19 - 23, 2012
Boston, MA ~ July 11 - 15, 2012
Chicago, IL ~ August 7 - 11, 2012

Who Knew Avon Had Patents?


Written by Gene Quinn
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc.
Patent Attorney, Reg. No. 44,294
Zies, Widerman & Malek
E-mail | Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn
Posted: Dec 9, 2008 @ 6:45 am
Tell A Friend!


Recently I was searching for some fun and exciting patent news to write about and I came across a press release put out by Research & Markets announcing that they have initiated coverage of Avon Products, Inc.  Curious due to the fact that my wife recently started selling Avon, I thought I might as well take a look to see why a market research company would focus on Avon. 

Here is what the press release said, at least in part:

The Avon Products, Inc. company report details the company’s key financial data, business operations, technology and patent activities, financial benchmarks against the Toilet Preparation Manufacturing industry in the US, and that industry’s pertinent information such as financial data, downstream industries, competitive landscape, upstream industries, and industry structure.

Who knew that Avon had patents?  I certainly didn’t!  But given that Avon Products generated $9.8 billion in revenues in fiscal year 2007, with a gross profit margin of 60%, it would seem this company sure knows what its doing and the fact that they have an extensive patent portfolio should not be a surprise to anyone. 

As it turns out, if you do a search of the US Patent Office online patent database, which covers patents issued since 1976, Avon Products is the owner of at least 161 patents.  I say at least 161 patents because there are 161 patents in the USPTO database where Avon is listed as the Assignee, which means they are the owner of record.  It is quite possible that Avon Products holds more patents, having acquired them after the patents issued or perhaps patents that simply do not list them as the Assignee.  When you do a search of the Patent Office records looking under the Assignee field you are only going to find those patents where the owner was made of record prior to the patent issuing. 

So what types of patent does Avon have?  Well you might be surprised.  It seems as if Avon does not have many design patents, but rather has a lot of utility patents that cover compositions, products and various methods.  I also suspect that given the fairly recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the chief patent court in the US, Avon will likely seek more design patents moving forward as well.  This is because the Federal Circuit has elevated the design patent, formerly the weak sister in the patent world, to new heights thanks to its decision in the Egyptian Goddess case.  Now the test for whether a design patent has been infringed is one that simply asks whether an ordinary observer would believe the defendant copied the patented design.  This is much broader than the previous test, which required copying of that which was novel, and will make it much easier to prove design patent infringement.  That is almost certainly why Nike sued Wal-Mart only days after the Egyptian Goddess decision.  So all inventors ought to be seriously looking at obtaining design patents, which are much easier to obtain and cost less than a utility patent.  Of course, a utility patent offers broader protections, but designs ought to be an ever more important part of any patent portfolio.

In any event, the most recent patent issued to Avon Products was issued on November 25, 2008.  US Patent No. 7,455,850, entitled “Two-part cosmetic product,” relates to a two-part cosmetic product and method for imparting a filling and swelling effect to skin, lips, hair, eyelashes, and/or eyebrows.  In reality this particular patent only specifically covers the method associated with the cosmetic product because all of the claims in the patent are method claims and it is the claims that legally define the scope of the exclusive protection provided by the granted patent.  Nevertheless, this is a real invention that seems to provide real utility.  I know I shouldn’t be surprised, but so many times I see the truly ridiculous patents, so it is really nice to see a company like Avon utilizing the patent system for what it is intended to provide.  The patent system is intended to reward inventors who tell us about their worthwhile inventions with a patent that gives them exclusive rights for a limited period of time.  This provides the incentive necessary to a company to continue to research and develop new products and methods; products and methods that will ultimately come off patent protection and be available to be freely used by anyone.  In the meantime the patent owner, in this case Avon, can enjoy exclusivity in the marketplace.

Another recent patent issued to Avon Products is US Patent No. 7,431,919, entitled “Mascara composition,” which issued on October 7, 2008.  This particular patent covers a mascara composition that reduces eyelash damage and even though it has low viscosity as compared to typical mascara compositions it surprisingly provides excellent buildup, lengthening and wear.  What makes this patent interesting to me is that it contains pictures as drawings.  First, illustrations are required whenever you file a patent application if illustrations would assist in the understanding of the invention.  Illustrations are almost always capable of assisting understanding, so they are always required in an application except when the application relates to a composition.  The formula of a composition is enough, so drawings or illustrations are not absolutely required, but you can certainly include them.  Photographs do not tend to make very good patent drawings, but here the whole point was to demonstrate the invention applied to an eyelash, so photographs were perfect to demonstrate what the patent attorneys wanted to focus on.   Second, this is in my opinion an excellent example of a composition patent, which is nice to see.  I have a lot of fun with Obscure Patents, and when I teach I use bad patents to show law students what to avoid, so it is nice to come across something well written.

One final parting thought.  If you are looking for an Avon Representative don’t forget my wife, Renee Quinn, can help you with all your needs.

Enjoy!


About the Author:

Gene Quinn is a patent attorney and the founder of IPWatchdog.com.

View Gene Quinn's profile on LinkedIn

 


About the Author

Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc.
US Patent Attorney (Reg. No. 44,294)
Zies, Widerman & Malek

B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Rutgers University
J.D., Franklin Pierce Law Center
L.L.M. in Intellectual Property, Franklin Pierce Law Center

Send me an e-mail
View Gene Quinn's profile on LinkedIn

Gene Quinn is a US Patent Attorney, law professor and the founder of IPWatchdog.com. He is also a principal lecturer in the top patent bar review course in the nation, which helps aspiring patent attorneys and patent agents prepare themselves to pass the patent bar exam. Known by many as “The IPWatchdog,” Gene started the widely popular intellectual property website IPWatchdog.com in 1999, and since that time the site has had millions of unique visitors. Gene has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the LA Times, CNN Money, NPR and various other newspapers and magazines worldwide. He represents individuals, small businesses and start-up corporations. As an electrical engineer with a computer engineering focus his specialty is electronic and computer devices, Internet applications, software and business methods.



Related posts (automatically generated):



  1. IPWatchdog.com Statistics for March 2009
    I am pleased to report that March 2009 was the best month in terms of traffic since IPWatchdog.com went live in October 1999.  It is hard to believe we are closing in on our 10th birthday, but all is well, good and growing, which is nice indeed.  In any event,...

  2. IPWatchdog.com Year End Results for 2009
    Later today my patent wishes for the New Year will be posted, which I realize are a little late, but I decided to take some time off over the holidays, visit family, have family visit and enjoy as much pro and college football as possible!  Before I turn the page...

  3. IPWatchdog.com Over 1,000,000 Page Views in May 2009
    I am pleased to report our May 2009 statistics, which show that we had over 1,000,000 pages viewed during the month! Just last month I was excited that we were closing in on half a million page views a month, and in May we had a grand total of 1,190,168...

  4. IPWatchdog.com Statistics for April 2009
    I am pleased to report our April 2009 statistics, which show what is probably fair to say is our second best monthly traffic totals since IPWatchdog.com went live in October 1999. I say “probably” because we had about 10,000 fewer unique visitors in April when compared to March, but the...

  5. PSEG Settles Patent Litgation With Katz
    Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), a diversified energy company with 2.1 million electric and 1.7 million natural gas customers located throughout New Jersey (NYSE:PEG) and Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., headquartered in Los Angeles, today announced the settlement of patent litigation between the parties. As part of the settlement,...

  6. Pressure Products v. Greatbatch: Why Another 5 Judge Panel?
    Nothing in the appealed issues in Pressure Products (claim construction, denial of motion for JMOL, leave to amend answer) even remotely hints at or suggests the basis for this five judge panel. In fact, Pressure Products has all the markings of a fairly ordinary, garden variety patent infringement case. So...

  7. IP Exclusive: An Interview with Congressman Jason Chaffetz
    Staffers worked with us to coordinate the interview with Congressman Chaffetz, which took place earlier today. I was told I would have 15 minutes with the Congressman, and graciously he allowed the interview to go a little long. We talked about the President's States of the Union address, patent reform,...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

 

Leave Comment