<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Octomom Nadya Suleman Files Trademark Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2644#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>This woman just makes me SICK!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This woman just makes me SICK!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tunde</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>Tunde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2644#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d argue it can&#039;t be &quot;merely descriptive&quot; a) when it&#039;s a coined word and b) when it&#039;s considered in relation to the goods and services in the applications. What the heck does &#039;octomom&#039; mean anyway? Maybe it&#039;s a mom with octuplets, maybe it&#039;s a cheeky reference to a mom who needs 8 arms (don&#039;t we all), maybe a mom who likes octopus. My vote would be suggestive, yes, descriptive no. As to the confusion question, I&#039;ll be interested to see what happens too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue it can&#8217;t be &#8220;merely descriptive&#8221; a) when it&#8217;s a coined word and b) when it&#8217;s considered in relation to the goods and services in the applications. What the heck does &#8216;octomom&#8217; mean anyway? Maybe it&#8217;s a mom with octuplets, maybe it&#8217;s a cheeky reference to a mom who needs 8 arms (don&#8217;t we all), maybe a mom who likes octopus. My vote would be suggestive, yes, descriptive no. As to the confusion question, I&#8217;ll be interested to see what happens too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/#comment-2035</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2644#comment-2035</guid>
		<description>Mike-

Are there really others who are using the name as a trademark, or are they just using it to refer to her?  If they are using OCTOMOM to refer to Suleman doesn&#039;t that help her?  With FEDEX, everyone was referring to sending something overnight as &quot;fedex-ing&quot; or referring to overnight mail as &quot;just send it FEDEX at the post office.&quot;  The Federal Express change seemed at the time to make sure the term &quot;fedex&quot; didn&#039;t become synonymous with overnight mail, as the term &quot;xerox&quot; had started to become with respect to making photocopies.

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike-</p>
<p>Are there really others who are using the name as a trademark, or are they just using it to refer to her?  If they are using OCTOMOM to refer to Suleman doesn&#8217;t that help her?  With FEDEX, everyone was referring to sending something overnight as &#8220;fedex-ing&#8221; or referring to overnight mail as &#8220;just send it FEDEX at the post office.&#8221;  The Federal Express change seemed at the time to make sure the term &#8220;fedex&#8221; didn&#8217;t become synonymous with overnight mail, as the term &#8220;xerox&#8221; had started to become with respect to making photocopies.</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/#comment-1955</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2644#comment-1955</guid>
		<description>Gene,

The big difference here is none of the competitors were using the name &quot;FEDEX.&quot;  I am sure in this case someone like Perez Hilton will provide a previous user of the term &quot;OCTOMOM&quot; in the entertainment industry.  She may be able to get the clothing mark though.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene,</p>
<p>The big difference here is none of the competitors were using the name &#8220;FEDEX.&#8221;  I am sure in this case someone like Perez Hilton will provide a previous user of the term &#8220;OCTOMOM&#8221; in the entertainment industry.  She may be able to get the clothing mark though.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Malek</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/#comment-1954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Malek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2644#comment-1954</guid>
		<description>With respect to Laura&#039;s comment, it would be interesting to see if an opposition is filed by someone who may be considered a senior user.  The term was coined by others, and due to its popularity, someone may already be using the mark on similar goods and/or services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to Laura&#8217;s comment, it would be interesting to see if an opposition is filed by someone who may be considered a senior user.  The term was coined by others, and due to its popularity, someone may already be using the mark on similar goods and/or services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2644#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>Laura-

Can you elaborate a bit?  How would this differ from what FedEx did when they changed from Federal Express.  Remember the advertising campaign about 12 or 14 years ago now?  They said something like... &quot;OK... we get it... everyone calls us FedEx... so we are going to change our name...&quot;

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura-</p>
<p>Can you elaborate a bit?  How would this differ from what FedEx did when they changed from Federal Express.  Remember the advertising campaign about 12 or 14 years ago now?  They said something like&#8230; &#8220;OK&#8230; we get it&#8230; everyone calls us FedEx&#8230; so we are going to change our name&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/16/octomom-nadya-suleman-files-trademark-applications/id=2644/#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2644#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>I think the issue is not desriptiveness but whether she has the exclusive right (even irrespective of Super Happy Fun Fun) when the media created the term and applied it to her, rather than her coining the term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue is not desriptiveness but whether she has the exclusive right (even irrespective of Super Happy Fun Fun) when the media created the term and applied it to her, rather than her coining the term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

