<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nominating Randall Rader for PTO Director</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/30/nominating-randall-rader-for-pto-director/id=2989/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/30/nominating-randall-rader-for-pto-director/id=2989/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/30/nominating-randall-rader-for-pto-director/id=2989/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2989#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>not admitted to practice; no day-to-day experience with patent prosecution -- dealing with examiners, dealing with clients</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not admitted to practice; no day-to-day experience with patent prosecution &#8212; dealing with examiners, dealing with clients</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/30/nominating-randall-rader-for-pto-director/id=2989/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2989#comment-2661</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been doing this for over 35 years and will be 60 this year.

Not done yet, but getting closer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing this for over 35 years and will be 60 this year.</p>
<p>Not done yet, but getting closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/30/nominating-randall-rader-for-pto-director/id=2989/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2989#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Alan-

Do you want to be nominated?

I completely understand what you are saying, and on a lot of levels agree.  I view what you are describing as a COO, and the talents of someone like Rader, who could maybe twist some arms in Congress, as a CEO.

You are not thinking about retiring soon, are you?

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan-</p>
<p>Do you want to be nominated?</p>
<p>I completely understand what you are saying, and on a lot of levels agree.  I view what you are describing as a COO, and the talents of someone like Rader, who could maybe twist some arms in Congress, as a CEO.</p>
<p>You are not thinking about retiring soon, are you?</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/30/nominating-randall-rader-for-pto-director/id=2989/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=2989#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>While Judge Rader would command respect and surely has knowledge of the law, he has no knowledge of the day to day challenges of the PTO; dealing with POPA, the count system, the backlog, examiner training needs, PTO technology needs and the like.

What we really need is a return to the days of the one-time examiner now in-house patent counsel who is close to retirement and wants to make a difference in the field before he goes.

(Gee, that soulds alot like ME!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Judge Rader would command respect and surely has knowledge of the law, he has no knowledge of the day to day challenges of the PTO; dealing with POPA, the count system, the backlog, examiner training needs, PTO technology needs and the like.</p>
<p>What we really need is a return to the days of the one-time examiner now in-house patent counsel who is close to retirement and wants to make a difference in the field before he goes.</p>
<p>(Gee, that soulds alot like ME!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

