<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saving US Innovation: More Patent Funding Needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/09/saving-us-innovation-more-patent-funding-needed/id=4015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/09/saving-us-innovation-more-patent-funding-needed/id=4015/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:54:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ex-Examner</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/09/saving-us-innovation-more-patent-funding-needed/id=4015/#comment-10511</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-Examner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4015#comment-10511</guid>
		<description>As to getting quick first actions, Examiners have been known to look for easy applications and thereby work on some applications before others.  This ia especially true if the application can be allowed on the first action, a 2 point play.  And the other practice is to delay working on the 100+ claim application as long as possible.  Throw in the variance in the number of new applications in Examiner&#039;s dockets and anything can happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to getting quick first actions, Examiners have been known to look for easy applications and thereby work on some applications before others.  This ia especially true if the application can be allowed on the first action, a 2 point play.  And the other practice is to delay working on the 100+ claim application as long as possible.  Throw in the variance in the number of new applications in Examiner&#8217;s dockets and anything can happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/09/saving-us-innovation-more-patent-funding-needed/id=4015/#comment-5094</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4015#comment-5094</guid>
		<description>If the USPTO is short of funds, which I&#039;m sure it is, why do some of its Examiners fight so hard to block or delay the allowance of valid applications? If they would stop treating applicants like the enemy and realize inventors are not necessarily the bad guys, their revenue from patent issue fees could go up dramatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the USPTO is short of funds, which I&#8217;m sure it is, why do some of its Examiners fight so hard to block or delay the allowance of valid applications? If they would stop treating applicants like the enemy and realize inventors are not necessarily the bad guys, their revenue from patent issue fees could go up dramatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

