<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seven Ideas for Reducing Foreign Filing Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/14/seven-ideas-for-reducing-foreign-filing-costs/id=4566/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/14/seven-ideas-for-reducing-foreign-filing-costs/id=4566/</link>
	<description>Patents, Patent Applications, Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/14/seven-ideas-for-reducing-foreign-filing-costs/id=4566/#comment-7540</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4566#comment-7540</guid>
		<description>A further very important and much over looked point - make sure your application is in a fit state for both the US and Europe.  Europe requires a higher level of disclosure of how the invention is carried out. Leave it out and you face a lack of disclosure (Art 83) objection.  To add insult to injury,  Art 123(2) will insure that you can&#039;t remedy the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A further very important and much over looked point &#8211; make sure your application is in a fit state for both the US and Europe.  Europe requires a higher level of disclosure of how the invention is carried out. Leave it out and you face a lack of disclosure (Art 83) objection.  To add insult to injury,  Art 123(2) will insure that you can&#8217;t remedy the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul F. Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/14/seven-ideas-for-reducing-foreign-filing-costs/id=4566/#comment-7534</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul F. Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4566#comment-7534</guid>
		<description>Rule 8. ?  If not prohibited by a license that is exclusive, or otherwise, consider filing a &quot;License of Right&quot; for older European patents to save large amounts of money on their maintenance fees [with very low odds of anyone exercising it].  [In addition to conducting regular reviews for alternatively simply abandoning older foreign patents no longer of enough value to justify their high maintenence fees.]

    Also, some companies are, in fact, doing more outsourcing [rather than in-house] prep and prosecution, after considering fully factored costs [employee benefits, secretaries,  office space, and other overhead, plus the effect on some individuals of less intense billing pressures in-house.]  That outsourcing unfortunately can have some adverse effects on patent quality, including unfamiliarity of new outside counsel attorneys with the company technologies, inventors, products and prior art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule 8. ?  If not prohibited by a license that is exclusive, or otherwise, consider filing a &#8220;License of Right&#8221; for older European patents to save large amounts of money on their maintenance fees [with very low odds of anyone exercising it].  [In addition to conducting regular reviews for alternatively simply abandoning older foreign patents no longer of enough value to justify their high maintenence fees.]</p>
<p>    Also, some companies are, in fact, doing more outsourcing [rather than in-house] prep and prosecution, after considering fully factored costs [employee benefits, secretaries,  office space, and other overhead, plus the effect on some individuals of less intense billing pressures in-house.]  That outsourcing unfortunately can have some adverse effects on patent quality, including unfamiliarity of new outside counsel attorneys with the company technologies, inventors, products and prior art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
