Today's Date: May 22, 2012 Search | Home | Contact | Services | Patent Attorney | Patent Search | Provisional Patent Application | Patent Application | Software Patent | Confidentiality Agreements
MORE LIVE LOCATIONS:

New York, NY ~ May 16 - 20, 2012
Houston, TX ~ June 6 - 10, 2012
San Francisco, CA ~ June 19 - 23, 2012
Boston, MA ~ July 11 - 15, 2012
Chicago, IL ~ August 7 - 11, 2012

Patent Buddy Releases Top 100 Law Firms List


Written by Gene Quinn
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc.
Patent Attorney, Reg. No. 44,294
Zies, Widerman & Malek
E-mail | Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn
Posted: Aug 24, 2009 @ 10:01 pm
Tell A Friend!


UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 at 11:54am Eastern

It has come to my attention that the Patent Buddy Top 100 seems to be flawed.  I have been contacted by one firm on the Top 100 list and told that number of patents they obtained in 2008 is at least double what is listed on the list.  I then did a search for myself and confirmed this, and subsequently searched a few other firms using the USPTO database and confirmed other discrepancies.  That being the case, I do not feel comfortable leaving this list up on my site.

Here is the lead in paragraph I wrote for the story:

Patent Buddy, the most extensive database and networking website for patent attorneys and inventors, just released its Top 100 Patent Law Firms to complement its Top 300 Patenting Organizations.  The top law firms were determined based upon the number of patents the firm obtained on behalf of clients in 2008.  Similarly, the top 300 organizations were determined based on the number of patents obtained in 2008.  The top 25  patent firms are reproduced below, with the number of patents obtained in parenthesis.

Because there seems to be a number of inconsistencies I have removed the top 25 list I published, which was taken from the Patent Buddy list.


About the Author

Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc.
US Patent Attorney (Reg. No. 44,294)
Zies, Widerman & Malek

B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Rutgers University
J.D., Franklin Pierce Law Center
L.L.M. in Intellectual Property, Franklin Pierce Law Center

Send me an e-mail
View Gene Quinn's profile on LinkedIn

Gene Quinn is a US Patent Attorney, law professor and the founder of IPWatchdog.com. He is also a principal lecturer in the top patent bar review course in the nation, which helps aspiring patent attorneys and patent agents prepare themselves to pass the patent bar exam. Known by many as “The IPWatchdog,” Gene started the widely popular intellectual property website IPWatchdog.com in 1999, and since that time the site has had millions of unique visitors. Gene has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the LA Times, CNN Money, NPR and various other newspapers and magazines worldwide. He represents individuals, small businesses and start-up corporations. As an electrical engineer with a computer engineering focus his specialty is electronic and computer devices, Internet applications, software and business methods.



Related posts (automatically generated):



  1. Intellectual Property Today Ranks Top Patent Law Firms for 2010
    Intellectual Property Today has once again come out with its much anticipated list of the top patent law firms. At the top of the list was Oblon Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, with 4043 utility patents, 72 design patents, which represents an increase of 6.5% in 2009 over 2008....

  2. The Top Intellectual Property Law Firms of 2011
    Earlier this year Intellectual Property Today announced its annual Top Patent Law Firms for 2011. Just recently they also announced the Top Trademark Firms for 2011. I thought it might also be interesting to see which firms were mentioned on both lists. In fact, there were 11 law firms that...

  3. Darby & Darby Dissolving after 115 Years in Business
    Earlier today Darby & Darby, one of the oldest intellectual property boutique firms in the United States, announced that they are dissolving. The announcement, which seems to have come without much warning, confirms rumors that started swirling last night that an abrupt end was near for the firm that has...

  4. AUTM Survey: University Licensing Strong Despite Economy
    During fiscal year 2009, 596 new companies were formed as a result of university research, which is one more than the 595 formed in 2008 and 41 more than the 555 formed in 2007. The increase, while modest, does come despite a downturn in the U.S. and global economy, proving...

  5. PLI Sponsors Gene Quinn on Law Firm Speaking Tour
    Over the last month or so it has been made known to PLI that some law firms might be interested in me coming to the firm to give a talk or presentation on some hot patent related issue of the moment. It has also come to my attention that a...

  6. A Patent Bigfoot? The Mythical First Action Allowances DO Exist!
    Top 50 Law Firms with the most first action allowances according to PatentCore data. But where are these first action allowances coming from? All over the Patent Office really. They occur with plants (1661), organic compounds (1621, 1625, 1626), batteries (1725), active solid state devices (2818), electrical generators or motors...

  7. Calling All Patent Blogs
    In February I tried to compile a list of the top 25 patent blogs, but the list was admittedly insufficient.  With that in mind, I am giving it another go and looking for nominations. The original top 25 list was insufficient for several reasons.  Not only did I miss one...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

 

2 comments
Leave a comment »

  1. Gene,

    The Patent Buddy list relates only to patents obtained for the 300 companies that receive most patents from the USPTO. Clearly, most – if not all – of the firms on the top 100 list will also represent other clients, which is why the overall number of patents that the firms obtain will not correlate to the numbers detailed by Patent Buddy. That could explain the disparities you and the firm that contacted you have found.

    All the best,

    Joff

  2. Joff-

    Thanks for this clarification. I also received the same information from Patent Buddy. Perhaps I did not look closely enough at the list, but it seemed that others were having the same trouble interpreting the results that I was (once the problem was pointed out to me). That being the case, and since I was not in charge of compiling the list and I want to do whatever I can to maintain what I believe is my reputation for accuracy, I chose to remove the list from IPWatchdog.com. Perhaps I over reacted, I don’t know. What I do know is that I was not comfortable with the list when inquiries were be made of me and about the list. I erred on the side of caution, no doubt.

    -Gene

Leave Comment