<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Puzzling Difference Between Schmutz X and Compound 24028 in AstraZeneca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/27/the-puzzling-difference-between-schmutz-x-and-compound-24028-in-astrazeneca/id=6866/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/27/the-puzzling-difference-between-schmutz-x-and-compound-24028-in-astrazeneca/id=6866/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TT</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/27/the-puzzling-difference-between-schmutz-x-and-compound-24028-in-astrazeneca/id=6866/#comment-8871</link>
		<dc:creator>TT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6866#comment-8871</guid>
		<description>Does it strike anyone else as funny that what we called the scum floating on top of our reaction flasks or any other obvious impurity (no pun intended) was schmutz or schmutz  X for &quot;unknown schmutz&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it strike anyone else as funny that what we called the scum floating on top of our reaction flasks or any other obvious impurity (no pun intended) was schmutz or schmutz  X for &#8220;unknown schmutz&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

