<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; &#171; Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/#comment-9861</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; &#171; Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7655#comment-9861</guid>
		<description>[...] Go here to read the rest:  Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go here to read the rest:  Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; &#171; Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/#comment-9843</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; &#171; Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7655#comment-9843</guid>
		<description>[...] See the original post: Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the original post: Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/#comment-9839</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7655#comment-9839</guid>
		<description>Time once again for me to renew my call for district court judges to enforce Rule 11 sanctions, which they never seem to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time once again for me to renew my call for district court judges to enforce Rule 11 sanctions, which they never seem to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; Federal Me</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/#comment-9836</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230; Federal Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7655#comment-9836</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post:  Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230;          By admin &#124; category: Uncategorized &#124; tags: against-the-creators, creators, fbi, indiana, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post:  Science Fiction, Patent Haters and Useless Federal Complaints &#8230;          By admin | category: Uncategorized | tags: against-the-creators, creators, fbi, indiana, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/#comment-9835</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7655#comment-9835</guid>
		<description>James-

That is a good question, and it is impossible to know at this point.  There may well be merit to a patent infringement claim, but I think the first order of business should be to seek dismissal of the complaint based on the fact that it contains no factual assertions and there is no way for it to be defended.  Courts are loathe to dismiss complaints though, and would likely grant leave to amend, which is typically liberally granted at least once.  So the defendants will likely have to waste tens of thousands of dollars before they can ever get to the point where they have any hope of determining what the plaintiff&#039;s theory is and whether there is any merit.  

Even if this were to resolve once and for all relatively quickly I would anticipate $100K plus being spent by the defendants.  But what is quick?  Motions to dismiss are rarely granted, leave to amend is typically granted, so that means they would likely need to fight through at least some discovery and into Summary Judgment.  If the case has merit and actually proceeds through discovery and to trial, then you are easily  talking $1 million or more for attorneys, perhaps much more. 

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James-</p>
<p>That is a good question, and it is impossible to know at this point.  There may well be merit to a patent infringement claim, but I think the first order of business should be to seek dismissal of the complaint based on the fact that it contains no factual assertions and there is no way for it to be defended.  Courts are loathe to dismiss complaints though, and would likely grant leave to amend, which is typically liberally granted at least once.  So the defendants will likely have to waste tens of thousands of dollars before they can ever get to the point where they have any hope of determining what the plaintiff&#8217;s theory is and whether there is any merit.  </p>
<p>Even if this were to resolve once and for all relatively quickly I would anticipate $100K plus being spent by the defendants.  But what is quick?  Motions to dismiss are rarely granted, leave to amend is typically granted, so that means they would likely need to fight through at least some discovery and into Summary Judgment.  If the case has merit and actually proceeds through discovery and to trial, then you are easily  talking $1 million or more for attorneys, perhaps much more. </p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Love</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/12/10/science-fiction-patent-haters-and-useless-federal-complaints/id=7655/#comment-9834</link>
		<dc:creator>James Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7655#comment-9834</guid>
		<description>You describe the complaint in pretty harsh terms.  How much money do you think it will take the defendant to put this to rest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You describe the complaint in pretty harsh terms.  How much money do you think it will take the defendant to put this to rest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

