<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Wishes for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Praying the Supremes Get Bilski Right in 2010 &#124; IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-11463</link>
		<dc:creator>Praying the Supremes Get Bilski Right in 2010 &#124; IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-11463</guid>
		<description>[...] the Supremes Get Bilski Right in 2010Yesterday I published my Patent Wishes for 2010.  Those things identified were largely industry wide wishes or desires and did not focus on any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Supremes Get Bilski Right in 2010Yesterday I published my Patent Wishes for 2010.  Those things identified were largely industry wide wishes or desires and did not focus on any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paper Finds Non-Practicing Entities (aka Patent Trolls) Actually Increase Patent Quality : Innovators Network Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10563</link>
		<dc:creator>Paper Finds Non-Practicing Entities (aka Patent Trolls) Actually Increase Patent Quality : Innovators Network Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10563</guid>
		<description>
[...] one to mince words, Gene Quinn is in fine, &#8220;tongue-in-cheek&#8221; form in his latest post, Patent Wishes for 2010. Here&#8217;s one of my favorite parts of this lengthy effort; Quinn&#8217;s thoughts on Wish #2, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one to mince words, Gene Quinn is in fine, &#8220;tongue-in-cheek&#8221; form in his latest post, Patent Wishes for 2010. Here&#8217;s one of my favorite parts of this lengthy effort; Quinn&#8217;s thoughts on Wish #2, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breadcrumbs</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10426</link>
		<dc:creator>breadcrumbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10426</guid>
		<description>Slightly off-topic, but Gene I thought you would be interested in the record setting number of patents for US companies LAST YEAR.

Story at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/american-companies-capture-less-than-majority-of-2009-us-patent-pool-81219402.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/american-companies-capture-less-than-majority-of-2009-us-patent-pool-81219402.html&lt;/a&gt;

I believe that this bolsters more than one of your positions regarding patents and innovation in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly off-topic, but Gene I thought you would be interested in the record setting number of patents for US companies LAST YEAR.</p>
<p>Story at <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/american-companies-capture-less-than-majority-of-2009-us-patent-pool-81219402.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/american-companies-capture-less-than-majority-of-2009-us-patent-pool-81219402.html</a></p>
<p>I believe that this bolsters more than one of your positions regarding patents and innovation in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Dogma</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10307</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Dogma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10307</guid>
		<description>Thanks Gene - that&#039;ll be $1,985.72 for the glass.  It&#039;s a patented recipe - or is that copyrighted?  ;-p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gene &#8211; that&#8217;ll be $1,985.72 for the glass.  It&#8217;s a patented recipe &#8211; or is that copyrighted?  ;-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10294</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10294</guid>
		<description>Blind-

You have been quite an instigator.  I never imagined that what was really a straight forward, non confrontational article would stir so much animosity.  I thought I played it pretty straight.  I guess pointing out that you are not an innovator unless you actually innovate cause folks to go apoplectic.  Also having the audacity to point out the sophisticated inventors do not invest unless there are patents and software cannot be protected by trade secrets upset a lot of apple carts.  I actually forgot I went off on this path at your suggestion!

I will buy a round of Kool-aid to celebrate... but not of the JJ variety :-)

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blind-</p>
<p>You have been quite an instigator.  I never imagined that what was really a straight forward, non confrontational article would stir so much animosity.  I thought I played it pretty straight.  I guess pointing out that you are not an innovator unless you actually innovate cause folks to go apoplectic.  Also having the audacity to point out the sophisticated inventors do not invest unless there are patents and software cannot be protected by trade secrets upset a lot of apple carts.  I actually forgot I went off on this path at your suggestion!</p>
<p>I will buy a round of Kool-aid to celebrate&#8230; but not of the JJ variety <img src='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blind dogma</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10293</link>
		<dc:creator>blind dogma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10293</guid>
		<description>Gene,

Do I get a cut of the pie for instigating the &quot;Pray for&quot; list?  I&#039;ll share my Kool-aid sales!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene,</p>
<p>Do I get a cut of the pie for instigating the &#8220;Pray for&#8221; list?  I&#8217;ll share my Kool-aid sales!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10282</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10282</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see the standards for declaratory judgement actions clarified and adjusted to facilitate, rather than hinder, licensing transactions.   In fact, that would be at the top of my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see the standards for declaratory judgement actions clarified and adjusted to facilitate, rather than hinder, licensing transactions.   In fact, that would be at the top of my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10136</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10136</guid>
		<description>BD-

Thanks.  I am working on something now that will focus on some heavy inside baseball stuff, dealing with Bilski and gene patents.  More to come soon.  I wanted to try and make this more of an across the board piece for the big ticket fixes that will impact the whole industry.  

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BD-</p>
<p>Thanks.  I am working on something now that will focus on some heavy inside baseball stuff, dealing with Bilski and gene patents.  More to come soon.  I wanted to try and make this more of an across the board piece for the big ticket fixes that will impact the whole industry.  </p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blind dogma</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10135</link>
		<dc:creator>blind dogma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10135</guid>
		<description>Nice wishes Gene,  any &quot;category&quot; wishes, you know, for our favorites like software and genetics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice wishes Gene,  any &#8220;category&#8221; wishes, you know, for our favorites like software and genetics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disability Insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/04/patent-wishes-for-2010/id=7783/#comment-10134</link>
		<dc:creator>Disability Insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7783#comment-10134</guid>
		<description>If suggestion 2 was followed, that would mean money would be spent in other much needed places too.  Maybe when a re-election comes, we might get lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If suggestion 2 was followed, that would mean money would be spent in other much needed places too.  Maybe when a re-election comes, we might get lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

