<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LegalZoom Sued in Class Action for Unauthorized Law Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick "patent drawings man" Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick "patent drawings man" Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>Any updates in the case? I would really like to see how this plays out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any updates in the case? I would really like to see how this plays out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-19636</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-19636</guid>
		<description>Richard-

The fact that LegalZoom is advertising on TV doesn&#039;t mean there isn&#039;t validity to the lawsuit.  Lawsuits are not resolved over night.

I have also heard that LegalZoom&#039;s trademark business is in jeopardy with relevant authorities looking closely.

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard-</p>
<p>The fact that LegalZoom is advertising on TV doesn&#8217;t mean there isn&#8217;t validity to the lawsuit.  Lawsuits are not resolved over night.</p>
<p>I have also heard that LegalZoom&#8217;s trademark business is in jeopardy with relevant authorities looking closely.</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Weed</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-19635</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Weed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-19635</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re still advertising on TV, couldn&#039;t have been much to the lawsuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re still advertising on TV, couldn&#8217;t have been much to the lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-18727</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-18727</guid>
		<description>Ben-

Your position is extraordinarily naive.  How much experience do you have with LegalZoom and working with former LegalZoom clients?  

Once upon a time LegalZoom was legitimate, but over time they started to do more and more and are quite clearly engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.  All you have to do to verify this is select a series of legal questions and call their customer service number.  You will get answers, which is the practice of law.  You are likely not to get the right answers, which is tragic when people rely on them.

The unauthorized practice of law rules and statutes is not about lawyer protectionism, it is about protecting the public.  You need to wake up.

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben-</p>
<p>Your position is extraordinarily naive.  How much experience do you have with LegalZoom and working with former LegalZoom clients?  </p>
<p>Once upon a time LegalZoom was legitimate, but over time they started to do more and more and are quite clearly engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.  All you have to do to verify this is select a series of legal questions and call their customer service number.  You will get answers, which is the practice of law.  You are likely not to get the right answers, which is tragic when people rely on them.</p>
<p>The unauthorized practice of law rules and statutes is not about lawyer protectionism, it is about protecting the public.  You need to wake up.</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Glass</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-18719</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-18719</guid>
		<description>The LegalZoom controversy has hit Virginia. The position of the Virginia State Bar is anti consumer.

This video explains:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vamedmal.com/library/legalzoom-the-unauthorized-practice-of-law-in-virginia.cfm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vamedmal.com/library/legalzoom-the-unauthorized-practice-of-law-in-virginia.cfm&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LegalZoom controversy has hit Virginia. The position of the Virginia State Bar is anti consumer.</p>
<p>This video explains:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vamedmal.com/library/legalzoom-the-unauthorized-practice-of-law-in-virginia.cfm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.vamedmal.com/library/legalzoom-the-unauthorized-practice-of-law-in-virginia.cfm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPWatchdog 2010: ABA Blawg Tops + Over 2 Million Visits &#124; IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-18099</link>
		<dc:creator>IPWatchdog 2010: ABA Blawg Tops + Over 2 Million Visits &#124; IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-18099</guid>
		<description>[...] LegalZoom Sued in Class Action for Unauthorized Practice of Law (15,277) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LegalZoom Sued in Class Action for Unauthorized Practice of Law (15,277) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Legal Documents Company (LegalZoom) Sued Over Flawed Estate Plan &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-16243</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Legal Documents Company (LegalZoom) Sued Over Flawed Estate Plan &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-16243</guid>
		<description>[...] suit against LegalZoom. In December 2009, a Missouri man who paid LegalZoom to prepare his will sued the company for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (Janson v. LegalZoom). The lawsuit is also seeking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suit against LegalZoom. In December 2009, a Missouri man who paid LegalZoom to prepare his will sued the company for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (Janson v. LegalZoom). The lawsuit is also seeking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emelda</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-15305</link>
		<dc:creator>Emelda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-15305</guid>
		<description>Use of the term &quot;legal&quot; in the name of the business, &quot;LegalZoom,&quot; appears to me to be totally deceptive. I have some knowledge and training in law (paralegal certificate) and consumer protection. Yet, on the basis of the name, I &quot;assumed&quot; that &quot;LegalZoom&quot; was a law firm. I wonder how many of their purported &quot;Over 1 million customers&quot; are similarly misled? Personally, I think that using the name &quot;LegalZoom&quot; is misleading and deceptive.
One other thought, with over 1 million customers, can&#039;t they at least hire a couple attorneys to validate the information they are providing? 
Fortunately, I always do my homework, especially when it comes to any online product or service. That is how I got to ipwatchdog.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of the term &#8220;legal&#8221; in the name of the business, &#8220;LegalZoom,&#8221; appears to me to be totally deceptive. I have some knowledge and training in law (paralegal certificate) and consumer protection. Yet, on the basis of the name, I &#8220;assumed&#8221; that &#8220;LegalZoom&#8221; was a law firm. I wonder how many of their purported &#8220;Over 1 million customers&#8221; are similarly misled? Personally, I think that using the name &#8220;LegalZoom&#8221; is misleading and deceptive.<br />
One other thought, with over 1 million customers, can&#8217;t they at least hire a couple attorneys to validate the information they are providing?<br />
Fortunately, I always do my homework, especially when it comes to any online product or service. That is how I got to ipwatchdog.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegalZoom Sued (Again) &#124; Law Office of Robert C. Fafatas</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-13715</link>
		<dc:creator>LegalZoom Sued (Again) &#124; Law Office of Robert C. Fafatas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-13715</guid>
		<description>[...] a class action lawsuit in California.    The company is also the subject of at least one other lawsuit in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a class action lawsuit in California.    The company is also the subject of at least one other lawsuit in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Legal Forms Company Sued &#171; Law Office of Adam J. Roa, P.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/09/legalzoom-sued-in-class-action-for-unauthorized-law-practice/id=8816/#comment-13599</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Legal Forms Company Sued &#171; Law Office of Adam J. Roa, P.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8816#comment-13599</guid>
		<description>[...] suit against LegalZoom. In December 2009, a Missouri man who paid LegalZoom to prepare his will sued the company for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (Janson v. LegalZoom). The lawsuit is also seeking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suit against LegalZoom. In December 2009, a Missouri man who paid LegalZoom to prepare his will sued the company for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (Janson v. LegalZoom). The lawsuit is also seeking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

