The Top 25 US Patent Classes for Patent Quality

Yesterday Ocean Tomo released the results of its Patent Quality Benchmark Study. The Patent Quality Study is intended to provide a benchmark for those studying patent quality across the 430 United States Patent Classes as defined by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Study was conducted using the Ocean Tomo PatentRatings® system, which is a software platform for objectively assessing patent quality, relative value and competitive trends for patents, patent portfolios, companies, and technology sectors. The Ocean Tomo PatentRatings® System itself is a patented method, covered by U.S. Patent Nos. 6,556,992, 7,657,476 and 7,716,226, as well as various other pending patent applications.

The Study reflects Nanotechnology (class 977) as the number one technology class for patent quality, with the highest current average IPQ® score, which is an objective rating of patent assets based on a statistical methodology. Class 977 received an IPQ® score of 126.5. A median score is 100.

According to the Ocean Tomo the top 25 patent classes in terms of patent quality are:

  1. 977 Nanotechnology – IPQ 126.5
  2. 607 Surgery: light, thermal, and electrical application – IPQ 126.3
  3. 365 Static information storage and retrieval – IPQ 126.1
  4. 178 Telegraphy – IPQ 124.6
  5. 326 Electronic digital logic circuitry – IPQ 122.8
  6. 725 Interactive video distribution systems – IPQ 122.7
  7. 438 Semiconductor device manufacturing: process – IPQ 121.9
  8. 347 Incremental printing of symbolic information – IPQ 121.4
  9. 623 Prosthesis, parts thereof, or aids and accessories – IPQ 119.9
  10. 606 Surgery – IPQ 118.8
  11. 711 Electrical computers and digital processing systems: memory – IPQ 118.7
  12. 358 Facsimile and static presentation processing – IPQ 118.4
  13. 712 Electrical computers and digital processing systems – IPQ 118.3
  14. 51 Abrasive tool making process, material, or composition – IPQ 118.3
  15. 463 Amusement devices: games – IPQ 118.1
  16. 257 Active solid-state devices (e.g., transistors, solid-state diodes) – IPQ 118.0
  17. 399 Electrophotography – IPQ 117.9
  18. 380 Cryptography – IPQ 117.4
  19. 713 Electrical computers & digital processing: support – IPQ 117.3
  20. 710 Electrical computers & digital data processing: input/output – IPQ 116.9
  21. 705 Data processing: financial, business practice, management – IPQ 116.6
  22. 704 Data processing: speech processing, linguistics, audio compression – IPQ 116.6
  23. 507 Earth boring, well treating, and oil field chemistry – IPQ 116.3
  24. 709 Electrical computers & digital processing: multicomputer data transfer – IPQ 116.3
  25. 382 Image analysis – IPQ 115.6

Those interested in obtaining a complete copy of the Patent Quality Study can contact Ocean Tomo by e-mail. According to the Ocean Tomo website, those requesting a copy of the report will be deemed to have agreed to the Ocean Tomo Terms & Conditions, so you probably want to make sure you take a look at those before you request the full Study.

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

3 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for Old Examiner]
    Old Examiner
    July 23, 2011 08:14 pm

    I agree with patent analyst that classification is the first step in obtaining a quality patent. Unfortunately, the Office has let proper classification slip away. Currently, even if an application is properly classified, COPA is forcing examiners to examine applications in art areas they are not at all familiar with which inevitably will result in an increasing number of invalid patents.

  • [Avatar for patent analyst]
    patent analyst
    July 22, 2011 09:12 am

    As noted by jimbotronix, it is curious that Ocean Tomo lists class 977 Nanotechnology as #1 for patent quality, yet Class 977 is a cross-reference class that only takes discretionary classifications. Note 1 in the Class 977 definition states “(1)Note. It should be noted that this is a cross-reference collection of art only and will not, therefore, take for original placement any U.S. Patent.”

    It would appear that this is a “study” of patent quality using proprietary methods by folks that don’t understand classification. Buyer beware.

    Proper classification of applications and subsequent patents is key to determining their quality. Yes, the app & patent need to meet many requirements as specified in patent laws & regs, and as interpreted by the courts. However, failure to properly classify means that the invention will not be examined by the art unit that is expert in the primary subject matter, and leads to the very high likelihood that it will not be examined against the relevant prior art. Without correct classifications, objective measures of patent quality mean nothing. This is a continuing problem for USPTO, and is notable among business methods patents and others on the Ocean Tomo list.

  • [Avatar for jimbotronix]
    jimbotronix
    July 20, 2011 07:09 pm

    Class 977 is merely a cross reference art collection:
    http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc977/defs977.htm
    http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/biochempharm/crossref.htm