A Special Thank You to Our Guest Contributors!
 |
Written by Gene Quinn President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc. Patent Attorney, Reg. No. 44,294 Zies, Widerman & Malek E-mail | Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn Posted: Dec 2, 2011 @ 5:13 pm 
|
|
As you may have seen, IPWatchdog.com has been named to the ABA Blawg 100, which recognizes the top 100 blogs on the Internet written by lawyers for lawyers. This marks the third year in a row we have been honored by the American Bar Association Journal as a top 100 blog.
Now the voting begins. Last year we were voted the top IP Law blog and greatly appreciate the support we received. Once again this year we are in the same category — IP Law — as is Professor Dennis Crouch’s widely popular PatentlyO blog. If you are inclined to vote for us we would once again greatly appreciate your support.
Over the years IPWatchdog.com has continued to try and add additional perspectives from a wide variety of guest contributors, ranging from well respected practicing attorneys and agents to high profile academics to inventors and pro-patent lobbyists. It is hard to imagine providing such depth of analysis on such an array of topics without having truly wonderful guest authors. So we take this moment to say a very special thank you and to shine the spotlight on them. Each deserve to share in any recognition of IPWatchdog.com. While I am loathe to single any guests out I would be remiss if I didn’t separately thank both Beth Hutchens (10 contributions) and Eric Guttag (9 contributions)!
Without further ado, here are the guest contributors in alphabetical order, along with their contributions for 2011.
Jeanne Albrecht, Verif IP
Joseph Allen, Allen & Associates
- Shooting Ourselves in the Foot
- After Stanford v. Roche: Bayh-Dole Still Stands
- Remembering Norman Latker: The Passing of a Friend
- Stanford v. Roche: An Academic/Industry Collaboration Gone Wrong
Andrew Beckerman-Rodau, Professor of Law, Suffolk University
Michael Bowman
John Boyd, Rimon Law Group
Howard Bremer, Patent Counsel Emeritus, Wisconsin Research Foundation
Michael Carrier, Professor of Law, Rutgers University (Camden)
Bernard Cassidy, Tessara Technologies, Inc.
Manus Cooney, American Continental Group
- Reshaping U.S. Patent Law. Who are the Winners & Losers?
- The America Invents Act — How it All Went Down
- Patent Reform: The Senate Makes Its Move
John Cronin, Chairman & Managing Director, ipCapital Group
Scott Daniels, Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian, Patent Reexamination Blog
- Reexam Creates Intervening Rights, Erases $29.4 Million Verdict
- Stay Ordered: Paul Allen Litigation Takes Abrupt Detour
- Microsoft Petitions PTO to Reverse Refusal to Grant Reexam in i4i
- Smucker Loses Reexam Battles, But May Win Litigation War
Eldora Ellison, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
Richard Epstein, Professor Emeritus, University of Chicago Law School
Robert Fletcher, President & Founder of IPISC
Jeremiah Frueauf, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
Charles Gorentstein, Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch
- The America Invents Act — Panacea of Just Pain for the PTO?
- America Invents Act Exercises “Con-Troll” Over Patent Litigation
Marla Grossman, American Continental Group
Eric Guttag, Guttag IP Law
- Heretical Thoughts on Strategies for Coping with First to File
- Throwing Down the Gauntlet: Rader Rules
- CAFC on Patent-Eligibility: A Firestorm of Opinions in Classen
- Federal Circuit Again Rules Equivalent Foreseeable in Duramed
- American Davids of Innovation, Start Your Engines
- Bayh-Dole Compliance Obligations Meet America Invents Act
- Best Mode Patent Raptor Claims Another Victim
- Did the CAFC Miss the Real Written Description Issue in Crown Packaging?
Dr. John Hershey, author of The Eureka! Method
Michelle Holobek, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
Dr. John Howells, Associate Professor, Aarhus School of Business
- Rebuttal Finale: A Response to Lemley’s Myth of the Sole Inventor
- A Critique of Mark Lemley’s “The Myth of the Sole Inventor”
David Hricik, Professor Law, Mercer University School of Law
Beth Hutchens, Hutchens Law Office
- 7 Common Misperceptions About Intellectual Property
- Internet Trademark Law 101: Don’t Metatag Me, Bro!
- I’ll get you, my pretty, and your little copyright too!
- Copyrights Last for a Limited Time, At Least in Theory
- Opportunistic Disney Seeks to Trademark “Seal Team 6″
- Prince and the Copyright Compulsory License Scheme
- The Google Book Settlement and Orphan Works
- Trademarking of Sarah Palin, You Can Trademark Your Name
- Trademarking a Domain Name? Sure, why not?
- Apple and Microsoft Fight Over “APP STORE” Trademark App
Ron Katznelson, Bi-Level Technologies
- Rebuttal Finale: A Response to Lemley’s Myth of the Sole Inventor
- A Critique of Mark Lemley’s “The Myth of the Sole Inventor”
- The America Invents Act’s Repeal of Secret Commercial Use Bar
F. Scott Kieff, Professor of Law, GW Law School
Jack Lander, The Inventor Mentor
- Beat the Odds: How to Get Your Invention Licensed
- A Limited Run: Testing the Market Without Going Broke
- Picking Strategic Partners: How and Why
Michael Lin, Marks & Clerk (Hong Kong)
Bryan Lord, New Venture Advisors
Mark Lemley, Professor of Law, Stanford University Law School
Mark Malek, Zies Widerman & Malek
Leo Mazur, President of the Inventors Society of South Florida
Chief Judge Paul Michel, CAFC (ret.)
Gary Michelson, Orthopedic Surgeon & Inventor
Cheryl Milone, Article One Partners
David Nay, Quinn Law Group
Henry Nohhaft, author of Great Again: Revitalizing America’s Entrepreneurial Leadership
- Dear Mr. President, Are You Listening?
- Eating Our Seed Corn for Job Creation
- Tax Policy Makes U.S. Uncompetitive, Not China’s Low Wages
- Start-Up Reality: No Patent = No Funding, No Business, No Jobs
Mark Nowotarski, Markets, Patents & Alliances
- First-to-File and the Speed of Technology Evolution
- Funding Your Invention: Get Started with Crowdfunding
- Increasing Patent Allowance Rates
- Don’t Steal My Avatar! Challenges of Social Networking Patents
Sue D. Nym, the anonymous contributors
- In re Lovin: The Examiner’s Answer is Too Late for Proper Rejection
- Having it Both Ways: the USPTO’s Inconsistent Positions
Marshal Phelps, Article One Partners
Michael Risch, Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law
Jeffrey Shieh, Inovia
Howard Skaist, Berkeley Law & Technology Group
Robert Snoep, Create IP
Daniel Spulber, Distinguished Professor, Kellogg School of Management
Mark Summerfield, Watermark – Intellectual Asset Management
- Intellectual Property from the Land Down Under, 2010 Part 1
- Intellectual Property for the Land Down Under, 2010 Part 2
Monica Talley, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
Mary Beth Tung, Davis Agnor Rapaport & Skalny
Maureen Veterano, Associate General Counsel, IPISC
Stewart Walsh, SP Attorney Services
John White, PLI Patent Bar Review
- Patent Reform and Patent Bar Review, What You Should Know
- Is it too late on Patent Reform?
- My Advice to Google — Keep Acquiring Patents
- An Interview with Sharon Barner, Former PTO Deputy Director
- The PTO Paradox: A Gatekeeper Mired in the Past
James Yang, OC Patent Lawyer
Arlene Zank, President, Coronado Group, Ltd.
Alex Zhang, King & Wood
Bob Zeidman, Zeidman Consulting
About the Author
 |
Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc. US Patent Attorney (Reg. No. 44,294) Zies, Widerman & Malek B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Rutgers University J.D., Franklin Pierce Law Center L.L.M. in Intellectual Property, Franklin Pierce Law Center Send me an e-mail  |
Gene Quinn is a US Patent Attorney, law professor and the founder of IPWatchdog.com. He is also a principal lecturer in the top patent bar review course in the nation, which helps aspiring patent attorneys and patent agents prepare themselves to pass the patent bar exam. Known by many as “The IPWatchdog,” Gene started the widely popular intellectual property website IPWatchdog.com in 1999, and since that time the site has had millions of unique visitors. Gene has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the LA Times, CNN Money, NPR and various other newspapers and magazines worldwide. He represents individuals, small businesses and start-up corporations. As an electrical engineer with a computer engineering focus his specialty is electronic and computer devices, Internet applications, software and business methods.
Related posts (automatically generated):
- IPWatchdog 2010: ABA Blawg Tops + Over 2 Million Visits
I am pleased to announce that IPWatchdog.com was selected by the readers of the ABA Journal as their favorite IP Law blog for 2010 ABA. I am also pleased to announce that for 2010 we had over 2,000,000 visits, delivered nearly 11.8 million pages, our homepage was viewed 3.06 million... - IPWatchdog.com Chosen as one of the ABA Journal’s Top 100
I am pleased to announce that the Editors of the ABA Journal yesterday announced they have selected IPWatchdog.com as one of the top 100 best law blogs by lawyers, for lawyers. Now readers are being asked to vote on their favorites in each of the 4th Annual Blawg 100’s 12... - Industry Insiders Make Patent Wishes for 2012
It is that time of the year where we all start to look ahead to the new year, perhaps making some New Year resolutions that are sure to last for at least a few days. Resurrecting something done two years ago, I once again contacted some of my friends to... - Patent Reform and Patent Bar Review, What You Should Know
Don't forget that as of the end of the 2011 fiscal year on September 30, 2011, the PTO has a “backfile” of nearly 679,000 patent applications that have not yet been given even a first Office Action. It will take at least 3 to 4 years, likely longer, to resolve... - Teenage Inventor Rebecca Hyndman Discusses Patents, Inventing, High School and President Obama
On September 17, 2011, I attended the Signing of the America Invents Act at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology. A young lady named Rebecca Hyndman, who is a senior at the high school, introduced President Obama, which took place immediately prior to his signing the Act into... - Some More Heretical Thoughts on Strategies for Coping with First to File Under the America Invents Act*
So what does this AIA “mumbo jumbo” mean in plain English? Well, to me and especially to others who have previously opined on this provision of the AIA, it means you not only don’t blow “novelty” in the U.S. by “publishing” the subject matter of your claimed invention (although you’ll... - BIO Expresses Some Concern with House Patent Reform
BIO also is concerned about the inclusion of broader prior user rights in the House bill, and believes that this issue, coupled with the harmful inter partes review changes, could set back efforts to pass meaningful patent reform this year by undermining the broad coalition of American innovators currently supporting...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Gene: This is a great blog and with the guest bloggers it is top rate. You deserve the awards and recogntion. If you ever need a tax angle covered do not hesitate to reach out.
Steven-
Thanks for the comment.
For quite while I have been trying to find someone who could write tax articles that would be relevant to our readership. Tax issues are way over my head, for the most part. I can write about what policy/law changes would mean for small business, but all high level stuff.
I will reach out to you via e-mail.
Thanks.
-Gene
Gene,
Tax issues are way over my head, too. Marvin Petry who I’ve known for many years (now with Stites & Harbison) is only one I know who writes about tax consequences in the patent sector. In fact, I’m pretty sure Marv has written a book on the subject.