Quantcast

9 New Administrative Patent Judges Sworn in at the USPTO

By Gene Quinn on March 2, 2012

Chief Judge Michel addresses the audience. New APJ Kumar (left) and Perry (right) look on.

On Thursday, March 1, 2012, at 2:00pm ET, the United States Patent and Trademark Office held a ceremony in the North Auditorium of the Madison Building on the campus of the USPTO.  The ceremony was for the purpose of swearing in 9 new Administrative Patent Judges, with the oath of office being administered by Chief Judge Paul Michel (ret.) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  The ceremony was nicely done, as always is the case at the USPTO.  It was punctuated on several occasions by crying babies — twins to be exact.  New APJ Trevor Jefferson is the proud new father of twins, both of whom were in attendance on this very special day.

The last such swearing in ceremony occurred on January 25, 2012, when 10 APJs were sworn in.  Thus over the last 5 weeks the Patent Office has added 19 new Administrative Patent Judges, but the Office is not done.  The USPTO is currently in the process of doubling the size of the Board by the end of fiscal year 2012, so expect more new appointments soon!  In fact, the USPTO is advertising for APJs for the Mechanical Group, APJs for the Communication/Computer/Electrical Groups.  I also understand that APJs will be hired for the Detroit satellite office, which will open during the summer of 2012.

In remarks to start the ceremony, Deputy Director of the USPTO Teresa Rea said, in part:

Since the implementation of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act the United States Patent and Trademark Office has been working diligently toward rebuilding the nation’s intellectual property system from the ground up… By inaugurating a new class of Administrative Jurists the Office is empowered to continue making significant strides in aggressively tackling the backlog of cases that often tie up innovation, innovators, technologies and breakthroughs that may lead to job growth.  But the America Invents Act is not just strengthening the Board in numbers.  The AIA is also working to establish in-house review processes that will drive down cost prohibitive court costs for inventors.  The Judges that we swear in today will be instrumental in shaping that future.

Teresa Rea, Deputy Director of the USPTO

This nicely captures why it is that so many highly talented individuals are interested in joining the USPTO to become Administrative Patent Judges.  The America Invents Act changes the title of the Board to Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and after September 16, 2012, the Board will be responsible for the newly created post-grant review, inter partes review, transitional business method challenges and ultimately for derivation proceedings.  This is an historic time for the patent system and many individuals are interested in participating from the front lines inside the Patent Office.  As Judge Glenn Perry explained in his brief remarks on behalf of the newly minted APJs, having never worked at the USPTO he felt he had missed something in his career, and he was feeling like a kid on the first day of school now that he has joined the Office.

The new APJs. From left to right: Justin Arbes, Jennifer Bisk, Trevor Jefferson, Johnny Kumar, Bryan Moore, Glenn Perry, Donna Praiss, Stanley Weinberg, Benjamin Wood

 

Left: Judge Justin Arbes - Right: Judge Jennifer Bisk

 

Left: Judge Trevor Jefferson - Right: Judge Johnny Kumar

 

Left: Judge Bryan Moore - Right: Judge Glenn Perry

 

Left: Judge Donna Praiss - Right: Judge Stanley Weinberg

 

Left: Judge Benjamin Wood - Right: Deputy Secretary of Commerce, Rebecaa Blank

 

 

 

 

 

The Author

Gene Quinn

Gene Quinn is a patent attorney and the founder of IPWatchdog.com. He is also a principal lecturer in the PLI Patent Bar Review Course, which helps aspiring patent attorneys and patent agents prepare themselves to pass the patent bar exam.

Gene’s particular specialty as a patent attorney is in the area of strategic patent consulting, patent application drafting and patent prosecution. He has worked with independent inventors and start-up businesses in a variety of different technology fields.

is admitted to practice law in New Hampshire, is a Registered Patent Attorney licensed to practice before the United States Patent Office and is also admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. As a patent attorney he is able to represent inventors and businesses seeking patents across the United States.

You can contact Gene via e-mail.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 1 Comment comments.