<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seth Waxman Discusses Advocacy in the Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/25/seth-waxman-discusses-advocacy-in-the-supreme-court/id=30520/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/25/seth-waxman-discusses-advocacy-in-the-supreme-court/id=30520/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Law Practice Center - PLI &#8211; Inside the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Patent Fascination</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/25/seth-waxman-discusses-advocacy-in-the-supreme-court/id=30520/#comment-287236</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Law Practice Center - PLI &#8211; Inside the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Patent Fascination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30520#comment-287236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Seth Waxman Discusses Advocacy in the Supreme Court [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Seth Waxman Discusses Advocacy in the Supreme Court [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rolando</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/25/seth-waxman-discusses-advocacy-in-the-supreme-court/id=30520/#comment-275324</link>
		<dc:creator>rolando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30520#comment-275324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gene;
Thank you for this article.  Very insightful, I am looking forward to the upcoming parts.

Rolando]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene;<br />
Thank you for this article.  Very insightful, I am looking forward to the upcoming parts.</p>
<p>Rolando</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/25/seth-waxman-discusses-advocacy-in-the-supreme-court/id=30520/#comment-272390</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30520#comment-272390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anon-

I have 2 more segments upcoming. They are short, but there was a logical topical split. The complete interview was fascinating.  I&#039;m glad you enjoyed it so far.

Cheers.

-Gene]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon-</p>
<p>I have 2 more segments upcoming. They are short, but there was a logical topical split. The complete interview was fascinating.  I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed it so far.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/25/seth-waxman-discusses-advocacy-in-the-supreme-court/id=30520/#comment-271938</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30520#comment-271938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article Gene - thanks!

(and thank you Mr. Waxman for sharing)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Gene &#8211; thanks!</p>
<p>(and thank you Mr. Waxman for sharing)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
