<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Examination of Software Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan E. Delo</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/#comment-284106</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan E. Delo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30747#comment-284106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remarkable presentation, which David is so very good at. He made the software patent issues much clearer for me in several senses, looking at them from a very broad perspective that perhaps only he could have. I wish he could stay a bit longer, but then again Time is just God&#039;s way of keeping everything from happening all at once I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarkable presentation, which David is so very good at. He made the software patent issues much clearer for me in several senses, looking at them from a very broad perspective that perhaps only he could have. I wish he could stay a bit longer, but then again Time is just God&#8217;s way of keeping everything from happening all at once I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/#comment-283615</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 22:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30747#comment-283615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks Gene for bringing David Kappos&#039;s unabridged remarks to our attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Gene for bringing David Kappos&#8217;s unabridged remarks to our attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/#comment-283000</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30747#comment-283000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice coverage - thanks Gene.

Impressed with the &quot;reprinted with permission&quot; byline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice coverage &#8211; thanks Gene.</p>
<p>Impressed with the &#8220;reprinted with permission&#8221; byline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
