A few months ago, I posted a three-part series entitled The Real McCoy: Should Intellectual Property Rights be the New Civil Rights in America? In that article, I explained that, in the last thirty years or so, there has been a shift from a labor economy to a knowledge economy. Consequently, intangible assets (with intellectual property rights (IPR) being chief among them) have emerged as the most powerful asset class, overtaking more traditional capital assets such as real estate, plant and equipment. I then went on to define and point out that there is an “Innovation Gap” – disparities between classes of people, caused by societal hindrances, which prevent them from securing the IP rights necessary to economically exploit the fruits of their creativity. I then argued that given the existence of an innovation gap, and the fact that we are in an information age with another industrial revolution on the way, IPR should be the focus of a renewed civil rights movement. After all, the world’s natural resources may be shrinking, but the opportunities for there to be new candidates for IPR ownership are ever expanding!
I ended my three-part article by recommending that members of the IP Bar should strive to volunteer more pro bono hours in order to help bridge the innovation gap. Encouragingly, I received some emails from IPWatchdog.com readers asking, “how can I help?” Well, after some research, here is a list of some organizations around the country seeking patent, trademark and copyright pro bono attorney volunteers.
Alabama State Bar Volunteer Lawyers Program |
Montgomery, AL |
Arts & Business Council of Miami |
Miami, FL |
Association of Corporate Counsel: Austin Chapter |
Austin, TX |
Birmingham Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Program |
Birmingham, AL |
City Bar Justice Center’s: Neighborhood Entrepreneur Law Project (NELP) |
New York, NY |
California Lawyers for the Arts |
San Francisco, CA |
Cannonball (formerly LegalArt) |
Miami, FL |
Colorado Lawyers for the Arts(COLA) |
Denver, CO |
Dallas Volunteer Attorney Program |
Dallas, TX |
Economic Development Pro Bono Project District of Columbia Bar |
Washington, D.C. |
Fed Circuit Bar Association, PTO Pro Bono Program |
Washington, D.C. |
Intellectual Property Law Section West Virginia State Bar |
Charleston, WV |
International Trademark Association |
New York, NY |
Lawyers Alliance for New York |
New York, NY |
Lawyers for the Creative Arts |
Chicago, IL |
Louisiana Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts |
New Orleans, LA |
Mobile County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Program |
Mobile, AL |
North Carolina Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts |
Durham, NC |
Ocean State Lawyers for the Arts |
Saunderstown, RI |
Philadelphia LawWorks |
Philadelphia, PA |
Philadelphia Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts |
Philadelphia, PA |
PILnet ProBono Clearing Houses |
New York, NY |
Pro Bono Clearinghouse Greater Richmond Bar |
Richmond, VA |
Pro Bono Project: Lawyers in the Library |
San Jose, CA |
ProBono Partnership |
White Plains, NY |
ProBoPat (Upcoming) |
Denver, CO |
Public Interest Intellectual Property Advisors (PIIPA) |
Arlington, VA |
Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) |
New York, NY |
Springboard for the Arts |
St. Paul, MN |
St. Louis Volunteer Lawyers and Accountants for the Arts |
St. Louis, MO |
State Bar of Georgia A Business Commitment Project |
Atlanta, GA |
Technology Assistance Small Business Development Center North Texas Small Business Development Center (NTSBDC) |
Dallas, TX |
Texas Accountants & Lawyers for the Arts (TALA) |
Houston, TX |
Texas Community Building with Attorney Resources / Texas C-BAR |
Austin, Texas |
The South Carolina Bar Pro Bono Program |
Columbia, SC |
The Veterans Consortium Pro Bono Program |
Washington, DC |
Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts |
New York, NY |
Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts of Massachusetts |
Boston, MA |
Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts (WALA) |
Washington, D.C. |
Happy bridging!
Raymond Millien
Raymond Millien is the General Counsel & Corporate Secretary at Exro Technologies. Prior to joining Exro Technologies, Ray was the Chief Executive Officer of Harness IP, where he oversaw the
[...see more]
Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.
Join the Discussion
One comment so far.
Inventor0875
March 4, 2013 12:04 amTo Raymond,
To occurs to me that, the design of the patent laws themselves may be the biggest factor in either empowering or hindering those with limited starting resources.
As one example, consider European “absolute novelty” (no public disclosure) versus U.S. grace period (harmonization).
Absolute novelty” unnecessarily creates a Catch-22 taking/preventing. The very things those with limited starting knowledge/resources use to advance their invention, are used against the inventors, to prevent they from patenting and benefiting from their invention.
There are many others, including those that unnecessarily increase the inventors costs.
There is a need for a series of articles about this, here and/or elsewhere.