Call for Information: Study on Patent Assertion Entities

By Gene Quinn
October 9, 2013

I recently received an e-mail from a colleague who is embarking on an interesting research project. This colleague, who would like to remain publicly anonymous for the time being so as to be able to conduct the underlying research privately and without influence.  The researcher is seeking to interview a number of different industry participants for a research study on patent assertion entities.

Specifically, the researcher is looking to talk to the following types of people:

  1. Solo inventors or small firms that have sold their invention rights to a patent assertion entity.
  2. Solo inventors or small firms that attempted to sell their invention rights to a manufacturing entity but failed.
  3. Entities that previously were engaged in manufacturing but now primarily license their intellectual property portfolios.
  4. Entities that have licensed technology from a patent assertion entity that previously was a manufacturing entity.

Interview data will remain confidential.  If you fit within any of these categories and would be willing to answer a few questions, please e-mail your contact information to:

The Author

Gene Quinn

Gene Quinn is a Patent Attorney and Editor and founder of Gene is also a principal lecturer in the PLI Patent Bar Review Course and an attorney with Widerman Malek. Gene’s specialty is in the area of strategic patent consulting, patent application drafting and patent prosecution. He consults with attorneys facing peculiar procedural issues at the Patent Office, advises investors and executives on patent law changes and pending litigation matters, and works with start-up businesses throughout the United States and around the world, primarily dealing with software and computer related innovations. is admitted to practice law in New Hampshire, is a Registered Patent Attorney and is also admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. CLICK HERE to send Gene a message.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 2 Comments comments.

  1. Solo Inventor October 9, 2013 5:52 pm

    Gene — would the interview data still remain confidential in the unfortunate event your colleague were subpoenaed or otherwise ordered by a court to testify concerning the information someone (solo inventor/small company) supplied for the research project?

  2. Gene Quinn October 11, 2013 11:30 am

    Solo Inventor-

    I am not sure about the answer to your question. The best I can suggest is to send a e-mail to the address above and ask that question and whether they view this as “reporting” and would agree to keep sources confidential.