Judge allows copyright case on ‘We Shall Overcome’ to move forward, song may be in public domain

By Steve Brachmann
December 12, 2016

Dr. Martin Luther King included "We Shall Overcome" in his final sermon in Memphis on Sunday, March 31, 1968.

Dr. Martin Luther King recited from “We Shall Overcome” in his final sermon in Memphis on Sunday, March 31, 1968.

On Monday, November 21st, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) issued a decision allowing a copyright case involving the well-known spiritual song and 20th century civil rights anthem We Shall Overcome to go forward. At the center of this case is the question of whether or not We Shall Overcome is part of the public domain in the United States, and the recent decision by S.D.N.Y. Judge Denise Cote indicates that the song could in fact be public domain material. “Resolution of the issues of originality and ownership will require discovery and a more developed record,” Cote’s decision reads.

This action comes after the lawsuit was first filed this April by the We Shall Overcome Foundation against the Richmond Organization, who licenses the use of We Shall Overcome in films and claims to own a federal copyright to the material. The suit was brought after the We Shall Overcome Foundation, which was looking to use a copy of We Shall Overcome during a scene of a documentary it had been producing, was repeatedly rebuffed by the Richmond Organization who refused to license the song for use in the documentary. Without a synchronization license, the documentary producers could face statutory damages of up to $150,000 and so hasn’t been able to complete production of the documentary.

To challenge the exclusive copyright held by the Richmond Organization, the plaintiff argues that the song lacks originality, having had a performance history going back decades before any copyright was registered on the material. Although the defendants own a copyright dating back to 1960, the song itself is based on an African-American spiritual with the same melody and similar lyrics, which first came into popular usage in the late 19th century or early 20th century. Not much later than that, the song became an important symbol in the early 20th century labor movement.

Indeed, according to WikipediaWe Shall Overcome is lyrically descended from a hymn titled I’ll Overcome Someday by Charles Albert Tindley, was first published in 1900.

Although the Richmond Organization scored a victory in the recent S.D.N.Y. decision, which dismissed all state law claims against the company, plaintiff’s Copyright Act claims will continue to go forward in the case. Judge Cote found that the We Shall Overcome Foundation had plausibly argued that the first verse of the copyrighted version of the song lacked originality, as it only differed by three words from a non-copyrighted version authored in 1948 by the FTA-CIO Workers Highlander Students. The defendants also brought forth written records from Pete Seeger, who was listed as an author in a copyright registration for the song, where he allegedly admits that he is unaware of who is responsible for changes in word choice leading up to copyright registration. S.D.N.Y. was not swayed by defendants’ arguments to dismiss the claims on the song’s originality. “Whether the Plaintiffs will prevail awaits a decision through summary judgment or at trial,” the recent S.D.N.Y. decision reads.

The Author

Steve Brachmann

Steve Brachmann is a writer located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than a decade. He has become a regular contributor to IPWatchdog.com, writing about technology, innovation and is the primary author of the Companies We Follow series. His work has been published by The Buffalo News, The Hamburg Sun, USAToday.com, Chron.com, Motley Fool and OpenLettersMonthly.com. Steve also provides website copy and documents for various business clients.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently No Comments comments.