Kroger files suit against Lidl alleging trademark infringement of private grocery food label

By Steve Brachmann
July 15, 2017

“Brewer’s Yard Kroger” by Hopeliz. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Cincinnati, OH-based grocery retailer Kroger Company (NYSE:KR) recently filed a trademark infringement suit against German-based discount supermarket chain Lidl over a private food label. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (E.D. Va.), alleges both trademark and service mark infringement and is seeking to have a related U.S. trademark application filed by Lidl cancelled. The suit comes just weeks after Lidl opened its first locations in the United States.

Kroger’s suit notes that the company holds a series of trademarks covering the use of its “Private Selection” food label in retail commerce, some of which were filed as far back as 2003. These include a series of standard character marks and one illustration with words mark which are claimed for the use on goods such as bruschetta, Hollandaise sauce, fresh fruits and vegetables, meat, fish, poultry, cheese, frozen desserts and other packaged foods. Having first used the Private Selection mark as early as 20 years ago, Kroger notes that it has invested in widely advertising the food brand and that it has sold billions of units under the brand name.

Kroger alleges that Lidl, with knowledge of the Kroger trademarks-in-suit, pursued registration of a similar stylized word mark covering similar goods and services. Lidl filed U.S. Trademark Serial No. 87175637 last September which would protect the use of a stylized mark including the words “Preferred Selection” on goods including fresh and frozen meat, fish, dairy products and a variety of other grocery items. On March 21st, Kroger filed a notice of opposition with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) seeking cancellation of the ‘637 trademark application on the grounds of priority and likelihood of confusion, dilution by blurring, and dilution by tarnishment.

Although Lidl only just entered the U.S. market in mid-June, Kroger’s complaint notes that Lidl has publicly announced plans to open 20 locations across the southeast United States this summer with additional plans to expand to 100 locations by the end of Summer 2018. By contrast, Kroger’s is reportedly the largest grocery chain in the U.S. with a total of nearly 3,000 locations in this country.

Kroger’s complaint filed in E.D. Va. lists five claims for relief including federal trademark and service mark infringement, federal unfair competition in violation of the Lanham Act, federal dilution, violation of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act, and common law trademark and service mark infringement. Kroger is seeking an injunction preventing Lidl from using the Preferred Selection mark, monetary relief including Lidl’s profits from the alleged infringing acts, compensation for corrective advertising and Lidl’s abandonment of the ‘637 trademark application.

The Author

Steve Brachmann

Steve Brachmann is a writer located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than a decade. He has become a regular contributor to IPWatchdog.com, writing about technology, innovation and is the primary author of the Companies We Follow series. His work has been published by The Buffalo News, The Hamburg Sun, USAToday.com, Chron.com, Motley Fool and OpenLettersMonthly.com. Steve also provides website copy and documents for various business clients.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 1 Comment comments.

  1. Andrei Mincov | Trademark Factory® July 18, 2017 12:47 am

    “Preferred Selection” is indeed similar to “Private Selection.” The logos are somewhat similar, too. The real question is, how strong is the “Private Selection” brand in terms of enforceability, given a potential argument that “private selection” merely describes a feature or characteristic of Kroeger’s products and services. Lidl is not a whipping boy who’s going to quietly take it. It would be interesting to see how far this dispute will go.

    Andrei Mincov
    Founder and CEO of Trademark Factory® / https://trademarkfactory.com, the only firm in the world that offers trademarking services with a predictable, guaranteed result, for a predictable, guaranteed budget. We can help you register your trademarks with a free comprehensive trademark search, for a single all-inclusive flat fee, with a 100% money-back guarantee.