Showtime files copyright suit against Mayweather-McGregor livestreaming sites

By Steve Brachmann
August 25, 2017

Floyd Mayweather Jr. at the 2015 Spike TV’s Guys Choice Awards held at the Sony Pictures Studios in Culver City, USA on June 6, 2015.

A great deal of hype and publicity has been building in the days leading up to the boxing match taking place on Saturday, August 26th between professional boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. and UFC champion Conor McGregor. In the United States, an estimated 50 million people are expected to tune into the pay-per-view event. Across the world, more than one billion homes in 200 countries will receive the live broadcast of the fight.

The McGregor-Mayweather fight has also been drawing a lot of money as well as attention from consumers. Each pay-per-view stream of the fight costs about $90 in the United States and there are expectations that the revenues from spectators could surpass the $500 million in revenues earned by the May 2015 boxing match between Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao.

Given all the attention this upcoming match has garnered, there are major concerns that websites enabling consumers to access streaming video illegally without paying, in violation of copyright, could hamper the fortunes of those broadcasting the event. In 2015, nearly three-quarters of all pirated film and television content was accessed through illegal streaming websites while piracy from torrent-based sites dipped to below 20 percent. A 2007 study on the costs of copyright piracy released by the Institute for Policy Innovation estimated that U.S. production, distribution and retail companies lose $58 billion every year due to piracy which also accounts for the loss of nearly 375,000 jobs in related industries.

On August 15th, New York City-based television channel operator Showtime Networks Inc., the exclusive producer of the live transmission of the Mayweather-McGregor fight, filed a copyright infringement suit in the Central District of California. The suit is a preemptive strike against a series of John Doe defendants operating a few dozen websites offering illicit livestreaming of the Mayweather-McGregor fight. Showtime’s suit notes that the firm has had “extensive experience” taking action against defendants such as LiveStreamHDQ, to which Showtime served a cease-and-desist letter in advance of the 2015 Mayweather-Pacquiao fight. Showtime alleges that LiveStreamHDQ is providing illicit livestreams through three of its own websites and 41 affiliate sites, each of which utilize the names of McGregor and Mayweather to target consumers of the fight and have the links appear in the top results for relevant search queries. Showtime seeks relief including a temporary restraining order as well as preliminary and permanent injunctions against the defendants to prevent them from making the fight available or inducing infringement of Showtime’s coverage of the event.

Illicit livestreaming operations are also abetted by the current generation of consumer tech, especially set-top boxes with Internet services or other over-the-top (OTT) devices. Recently, Los Gatos, CA-based streaming device maker Roku Inc. announced that it would be taking measures against customers operating private channels on their Roku devices which the company believes are being used to stream content illegally. Hardware and software developed by open-source media entity Kodi have also been the subject of law enforcement crackdowns in the UK and their use or sale is prohibited by major tech entities like Amazon.com and eBay.

The Author

Steve Brachmann

Steve Brachmann is a writer located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than a decade. He has become a regular contributor to IPWatchdog.com, writing about technology, innovation and is the primary author of the Companies We Follow series. His work has been published by The Buffalo News, The Hamburg Sun, USAToday.com, Chron.com, Motley Fool and OpenLettersMonthly.com. Steve also provides website copy and documents for various business clients.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently No Comments comments. Join the discussion.

Post a Comment

Respectfully add to the discussion.

Name *
Email *
Website