Korean court upholds $912M Qualcomm fine as tech rivals continue to make antitrust claims

By Steve Brachmann
September 7, 2017

On Monday, September 4th, a South Korean court denied a request made by San Diego, CA-based semiconductor developer Qualcomm Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM) to rescind a fine levied last December by the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) over alleged unfair business activities in patent licensing and chip sales. According to reports, the South Korean court decision keeps in place a $912 million in the latest blow to Qualcomm’s corporate intellectual property strategy.

Last December, the KFTC originally fined Qualcomm a total of $853 million after a three-year study concluded and found that the chipmaker limited market access among competitors and employed unfair licensing agreements which could stop shipments to licensees who didn’t comply with certain agreement terms. Qualcomm’s initial statement on the Korean regulatory fine indicated a great deal of disagreement and the chipmaker filed a motion for stay in Seoul Central District Court this February, citing potential commercial interests that might be seeking to influence South Korea’s regulatory action.

South Korea is not the only country in which Qualcomm is charging that corporate interference with regulators has led to negative decisions for the San Diego chipmaker. This April, Qualcomm filed a suit in the Southern District of California alleging that Cupertino, CA-based consumer gadget developer Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) had engaged in tortious interference by misrepresenting Qualcomm’s business activities to regulatory agencies in multiple jurisdictions, including South Korea. In Korea, Qualcomm alleged that Apple presented false information on its chipset suppliers to the KFTC, leading that agency to levy the antitrust fine against Qualcomm.

Recently, Qualcomm began taking additional fire on its business activities from a rival chipmaker, Santa Clara, CA-based Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC). In mid-July, Intel filed a public interest statement with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) in a Section 337 patent infringement case filed at the ITC by Qualcomm against Apple. In its statement, Intel said that Qualcomm’s allegations of patent infringement “a transparent effort to stave off lawful competition from Qualcomm’s only remaining rival.”

The legal squabble between Qualcomm and Apple is one which has continued to ramp up through this summer, with Qualcomm filing its Section 337 patent infringement complaint against Apple this July. That complaint asserted a series of six non-standard essential patents (SEPs) to counter Apple’s argument that Qualcomm was violating its fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) obligations regarding licensing its SEPs to others. Days after Qualcomm filed the ITC complaint, Qualcomm CEO Steve Mollenkopf made comments at the Brainstorm Conference in Aspen which reflected his expectations that the battle between Apple and Qualcomm would most likely be settled out of court.

The Author

Steve Brachmann

Steve Brachmann is a writer located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than a decade. He has become a regular contributor to IPWatchdog.com, writing about technology, innovation and is the primary author of the Companies We Follow series. His work has been published by The Buffalo News, The Hamburg Sun, USAToday.com, Chron.com, Motley Fool and OpenLettersMonthly.com. Steve also provides website copy and documents for various business clients.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently No Comments comments. Join the discussion.

Post a Comment

Respectfully add to the discussion.

Name *
Email *
Website