WIPO Stats on Patent Application Filings Shows China Continuing to Lead the World

By Steve Brachmann
December 12, 2017

China and USOn Wednesday, December 6th, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) released statistics on worldwide filing activities for patent, trademark and industrial design applications for 2016. One clear takeaway from the data released by WIPO is the growing dominance of China as a forum for patent application filings, underscoring the growing dichotomy of current patent policy regimes between China and the U.S. and how well either country is incentivizing innovation.

Globally, a total of 3.1 million patent applications were filed with patent offices worldwide during 2016, an increase of 8.3 percent over 2015’s filing numbers and the seventh straight year in which saw a year-over-year increase in global patent application filings. About 1.3 million patent applications were filed with China’s State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO), a record number of patent applications received by any patent office in a single year. China’s 2016 patent application total is greater than the combined total of patent applications filed in 2016 in the United States (605,571), Japan (318,381), South Korea (208,830) and Europe (159,358). These five jurisdictions accounted for 84 percent of all patent applications filed during 2016.

Between 2006 and 2016, China’s patent application filing activities have driven the overall growth of Asia as a growing region for filing activity. In that 10-year span, the percentage of patent applications filed with patent offices in Asian countries has increased from 49.7 percent of all filings up to 64.6 percent of filing activity last year. All told, Asian patent offices took in 2 million patent applications during 2016.

In terms of foreign filing activities, U.S. residents filed a total of 215,918 patent applications in foreign patent offices during 2016, the most among residents of any single country that year. As the WIPO news release notes, that’s more than four times the amount of patent applications filed by Chinese residents in foreign offices (51,522). However, what WIPO doesn’t note in the release is that, while U.S. residents are filing many more patent applications abroad than Chinese residents currently, the gap between those two numbers has decreased slightly. U.S. inventors filed 237,961 patent applications worldwide in 2015, so foreign patent application filings have decreased by more than 20,000 year-over-year, a 9.26 percent decline during that time. During that same period of time, the number of foreign patent application filings from Chinese residents increased by almost 10,000, up from 42,154 foreign applications in 2015 and representing a year-over-year increase of 22.22 percent.

The fact that overall U.S. patent applications have gone up even as foreign filings have gone down makes little sense to Erick Robinson, Director of Patent Litigation for Beijing East IP. “Foreign patents are more valuable than U.S. patents these days,” Robinson said, noting the difficulties many patent owners face in enforcing a patent in the United States. “My theory would be that company budgets for patent filings are probably going down largely as a result that patents in the U.S. are worth very little these days, so companies cut budgets for patent prosecution. One of the first things they cut is foreign patent filings. From a strategic sense, I think that’s wrong, but that’s what I think happens.” Robinson noted that he’s been advising most of his U.S. clients to file patent applications in China first, even those U.S. inventors who have no relationship to the Chinese market, because China is a more valuable market right now. In certain sectors like software, inventors are more likely to get a patent issued in China than the United States or Europe. “My guess is that what we’re seeing is just a general malaise and when you have that, budgets get cut. What gets cut is, ironically, not the things causing the malaise but which may be one of the few bright spots.” Robinson opines that inventors who aren’t even considering selling their product in China should definitely patent in China because Chinese competitors will undoubtedly sprout up. “Anyone who’s not considering China is an idiot,” Robinson said.

The statistics released by WIPO do not speak to the quality of the patent applications being filed, and it’s known that many patent applications being filed in China are of poor quality. This is especially true of the patent applications which are only being filed with the domestic office, which are the vast majority of Chinese patent applications. In 2015, 96 percent of all Chinese patent applications were filed domestically with SIPO only and WIPO’s 2016 numbers on China’s total patent applications compared to Chinese patent applications filed abroad don’t change that percentage in any meaningful way.

However, WIPO’s 2016 patent application statistics do reflect how the Chinese federal government has been working to create incentives to innovate and get Chinese innovators to file more patent applications. It will likely be another year before WIPO releases global patent application statistics for 2017 but it can be assumed that actions taken this year by the Chinese government will continue to encourage more patent application filing activities in that country. Late in 2016, China announced revised patent examination guidelines which relaxed barriers to patents for software and business method technologies and those revised guidelines went into effect this April. This July, SIPO announced new regulations which created streamlined processes for the examination of patent applications in certain fields including Internet, big data and cloud computing.

Innovation-friendly policies have also been followed by similar rhetoric being issued from the highest levels of China’s national government. This July, Chinese President Xi Jinping issued remarks at an important national economic conference that “IP infringers will pay a heavy price.” This September, Chinese copyright regulators issued statements to domestic and foreign firms in the music industry that they should be complying with international licensing standards in order to reduce copyright piracy. Even major Chinese firms like the e-commerce entity Alibaba have called this year for tougher IP policies, such as criminal sanctions against those who contribute to counterfeiting operations.

Chinese policy and rhetoric has been followed by various activities in that country which have been very friendly to IP owners. Through last July, foreign plaintiffs bringing suits to China’s special IP courts in Beijing won 100 percent of their cases for a perfect 65-0 record. This August, American athletic apparel firm New Balance won $1.5 million in a trademark infringement case filed against Chinese nationals. Although that’s a small amount compared to trademark damages awarded in other jurisdictions, it’s multiples higher than the maximum statutory damages for trademark infringement, a total which had even been raised by the Chinese government in recent years. Stronger copyright enforcement in China seems to be aiding licensing deals, at least in the book industry, as this August’s 2017 Beijing International Book Fair saw a nearly 5 percent increase in licensing deals compared to last year.

By increasing the chances that Chinese domestic firms will be able to obtain patents in software, business method and related fields, those entities will become more familiarized with the patent system and should become better filers of high quality patent applications in a global context. Many of these same firms are looking at the fortunes of growing Chinese tech giants like Huawei, the smartphone company which filed the most Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) patent applications in 2015. A working paper on mobile phone royalty rates issued this year by the Hoover Institution Working Group on Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Productivity (Hoover IP2) indicates that Huawei’s massive patent portfolio, which includes thousands of applications, helps that entity earn about 30 percent of all patent revenues earned by Chinese companies.

The current patent regime playing out in the United States could not look more different when compared with the recent actions being taken by China. It’s no secret that, over the past decade, there has been a concerted effort playing out between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches of the U.S. federal government which has been deleterious to the rights of patent owners to the point that our nation now ranks 10th, tied with Hungary, in terms of patent rights according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s 2017 IP Index. Although the U.S. may still have a massive lead on China in terms of foreign patent application filings, that gap is tightening slightly at the same time that the total number of Chinese patent applications filed has greatly outpaced anything American innovators can achieve under the current regime. And so, although it may make efficient infringer ally and patent troll Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), chair of the House IP Subcommittee, chortle with zeal to have it suggested, but it continues to look like there are lessons that the American patent system should be learning from the Chinese government if our country’s leaders want to honestly protect the rights of patent owners in our own country.

The Author

Steve Brachmann

Steve Brachmann is a writer located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than a decade. He has become a regular contributor to IPWatchdog.com, writing about technology, innovation and is the primary author of the Companies We Follow series. His work has been published by The Buffalo News, The Hamburg Sun, USAToday.com, Chron.com, Motley Fool and OpenLettersMonthly.com. Steve also provides website copy and documents for various business clients.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 2 Comments comments.

  1. Lost In Norway December 13, 2017 6:17 am

    Thank you for this article.

    Is “argh!” an acceptable response to the way that we are losing out to China? Well one way or the other, the internal monologue is “ARGH”

  2. Llewellyn Benn December 13, 2017 10:36 pm

    Mr. Robinson as a US patent holder I look forward to reading your articles I also encourage my friends and family to read these articles