Copyright Office Seeks Mechanical Licensing Collective Members

By Steve Brachmann
January 14, 2019

On December 21st, the Copyright Office published a Notice in the Federal Register relating to Title I of the Orrin G. Hatch – Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act (MMA). This section of the law created a new blanket licensing system that governs the licensed uses of musical works by digital music providers. In the recent notice, the Copyright Office is seeking input to identify entities which are appropriate for inclusion in the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) that will manage the new blanket licensing system.

Under the MMA, which was signed into law last October, the blanket licensing system replaces the prior licensing system for digital music providers, who had to obtain voluntary or compulsory licenses for musical works on a song-by-song basis. The MLC is responsible for collecting and distributing royalties from blanket licenses, establishing a musical works database relevant to blanket licenses and administering a process by which copyright owners can claim ownership of works. The law requires that the MLC be a single nonprofit entity created by and enjoying substantial support from copyright owners, capable of performing its administrative and technological functions and governed by a board of directors including a mix of voting and non-voting members.

The MLC board will be composed of 14 voting members and three non-voting members. 10 of the voting members will represent music publishers while the other four voting members will include professional songwriters who have retained their exclusive rights to their musical works. Of the non-voting members, one will be a representative of a nonprofit trade association of music publishers, one will be the digital licensing coordinator required under the MMA and the last will be a representative of a nonprofit trade association of professional songwriters. Under the MMA, the digital licensing coordinator (DLC) represents digital music providers in the administration of the new licensing scheme.

In requesting proposals for identifying members appropriate for inclusion in the MLC, the Copyright Office requests that designations include information appropriate for identifying entities which are best situated to perform the duties outlined in 17 U.S.C. § 115 as altered by the MMA. Such information includes a business plan for the establishment and operation of the MLC for its first five years; best practices for identifying copyrighted sound recordings and their associated copyright owners; proposals for processing large data sets necessary for the creation and maintenance of the musical works database; expectations on the competency of MLC entities to collect and distribute royalties in a fair manner; estimates on vendor contracts which the MLC will require to perform its administrative and technological duties; itemized proposals on budget funding for five years of MLC operations; and ways in which MLC entities can engage in educational outreach to diverse audiences for publicizing the collective and its ability to claim unclaimed accrued royalties for unmatched musical works. Proposals for the DLC include much of the same criteria along with documentation of support of that entity from digital music providers.

Proposals should also identify entities that can best adhere to the governance criteria outlined in MMA-altered Section 115 including the name and affiliation of every member of the MLC’s board of directors, operations advisory committee, unclaimed royalties oversight committee and dispute resolution committee; how the proposed members reflect their respective songwriter or music publisher communities; and bylaw drafts along with other information on how board members will approach confidential information or conflicts of interest. The Copyright Office is also seeking indicia of support for MLC entities from the greatest percentage of the licensor market for making and distributing musical works in the U.S. The statute requires that such support come from musical work copyright owners and not parties who administer works without any copyright interest. Proposed MLC entities should provide documentation of the endorsement criteria including an explanation of how the endorsement support has been calculated.

The Federal Register notice also discusses the potential for other public participation opportunities outside of the solicitation for information on proposed MLC entities. This may include public meetings or hearings as well as ex parte written communications presented to the Copyright Office that will supplement the written record. Initial written proposals for this notice of inquiry must be received by March 21st and the written comment deadline is April 22nd.

 

Image Source: Deposit Photos
Image ID: 9189604
Copyright Claimed By: ActiActi

 

The Author

Steve Brachmann

Steve Brachmann is a freelance journalist located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than a decade. He writes about technology and innovation. His work has been published by The Buffalo News, The Hamburg Sun, USAToday.com, Chron.com, Motley Fool and OpenLettersMonthly.com. Steve also provides website copy and documents for various business clients and is available for research projects and freelance work.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 1 Comment comments. Join the discussion.

  1. Elizabeth Russell January 14, 2019 2:44 pm

    Indie songwriters need to pay very close attention; organize; and take action to make their voices truly heard. The MMA is a power grab by big publishing that, in my view, borders on the unconscionable. My blog post: https://tinyurl.com/y79uafpy

Post a Comment

Respectfully add to the discussion.

Name *
Email *
Website