Amazon’s Counterfeit Problem is a Big One—for Shareholders, Brand Owners and Consumers Alike

By Steve Brachmann
February 27, 2019

“Although Amazon’s counterfeit woes have grown to the point that the company has finally disclosed the potential of liability to its shareholders, it’s still much more damaging to a brand owner than to Amazon when a consumer receives a counterfeit product.”

https://depositphotos.com/11106692/stock-photo-counterfeit-goods-concept.htmlOn February 1, Amazon.com, Inc. filed a Form 10-K annual report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Along with reporting its year-end earnings for the 2018 fiscal year, this particular SEC filing was notable because Amazon officially acknowledged to shareholders that the company’s online sales platforms face the risk of being found liable for fraudulent or unlawful activities of sellers on those platforms. This includes the company’s first-ever concession that Amazon may be unable to prevent sellers trafficking counterfeit and pirated goods.

“The law relating to the liability of online service providers is currently unsettled,” Amazon’s Form 10-K filing reads. Along with the specter of counterfeit sales, Amazon noted that its seller programs may render the company unable to stop sellers from collecting payments when buyers never receive products they ordered or when products received by buyers are materially different than the sellers’ description of those products at the point of purchase. While information regarding a corporation’s potential risk of liability is a regular feature of SEC filings, news reports indicate that this is the first time that Amazon used the word “counterfeit” in an annual report.

While this may be Amazon’s first acknowledgment of the counterfeiting activities that have been affecting the company’s online retail channels, it is unfortunately old news for large and small brand owners alike. In recent years, Elevation Lab, Daimler AG and Williams-Sonoma are just a few companies that have publicly called out Amazon for its unwillingness to deal with counterfeit products—the latter two companies having filed trademark infringement suits based on those allegations. Even Apple has claimed that 90% of Apple-branded products sold on Amazon are counterfeits. In June 2018, counterfeit watchdog group The Counterfeit Report detailed official communications with an Amazon representative responding on behalf of CEO Jeff Bezos, which indicated that Bezos himself is complicit in the sale of counterfeit items on Amazon’s e-commerce platform. The law surrounding online service provider liability may be unsettled, but Amazon’s role in enabling the sale of counterfeit goods seems to be very clear.

Amazon’s E-Commerce Structure Helps Counterfeits Thrive

According to Eric Perrott, trademark and copyright attorney with Gerben Law Firm, Amazon’s susceptibility to the counterfeit problem has a lot to do with how the company has structured its e-commerce services. Many consumers visit Amazon.com through their web browsers and expect that they’re visiting a single cohesive e-commerce platform but, as Perrott notes, Amazon is actually structured into three different e-commerce tiers. There’s the Amazon Retail tier, where Amazon employs buyers to negotiate wholesale rates for items, which are then sold by Amazon.com LLC. “In this tier, Amazon is the merchant in a more traditional grocery store or big-box store sense,” Perrott said. Then there’s Fulfilled by Amazon, where the sellers are third parties but the goods are stored in Amazon warehouses and shipped by Amazon employees. For this service, Amazon might charge sellers up to 50% of the retail price of the items being sold. Finally, there’s Amazon Marketplace, which functions more like eBay or other e-commerce sites where Amazon is merely the platform and the storage and shipping is handled exclusively by the seller.

“A lot of people don’t realize the difference,” Perrott said. “They think that each tier is Amazon.” Perrott said that Fulfilled by Amazon is the particular e-commerce tier for which Amazon has earned the most flak regarding its counterfeit issues. “Consumer trust is developed from the idea that when you buy from Amazon, you’re getting what you believe is a genuine product from Amazon,” he said. Although Amazon’s counterfeit woes have grown to the point that the company has finally disclosed the potential of liability to its shareholders, the recent suits from Daimler and Williams-Sonoma demonstrate that it’s much more damaging to a brand owner than to Amazon when a consumer receives a counterfeit product. “Sometimes people don’t even know that they’re getting counterfeits,” Perrott said. “They have a bad experience and blame it on the brand owner.”

Perrott said that he had recently represented a pair of clients dealing with counterfeit issues on Amazon’s website, one of which was a brand owner who sold bed protectors, including those meant to prevent bed bug infestations. One counterfeit seller had photocopied labels used on the authentic product, but Perrott’s client was able to identify certain packaging techniques that differed from the authentic branded article. “For certain brands that sell these types of sensitive consumable products, Amazon does offer some brand gating that only allows resellers if they prove that they acquired the product legally,” Perrott said. In the case of the bed protector client, he said that the counterfeit seller was able to continue operating after forging multiple invoices on the bed protector products. “Amazon doesn’t have the infrastructure to flag a seller after it has received a second fake invoice,” Perrott said.

The Main Counterfeit Culprit? China

“Addressing online counterfeits is a neverending battle for many brand owners,” said Amy Ziegler, Shareholder at Greer Burns & Crain. She said that counterfeit problems extend across all major online retail platforms including Amazon. In particular, she said that there’s a high probability that a product is a counterfeit if it’s coming from a third-party seller based in China. Nearly 90% of all global counterfeit products seized by U.S. customs agents in 2017 came from China and Hong Kong. “Not only is [the focus on China] justified, it is a matter of fact,” Ziegler said.

While online retail platforms could always be doing more, Ziegler said that they have made substantial improvements in recent years both from increased actions by brand owners and more cooperation from online retailers. “The counterfeit problem is too large for any one stakeholder to address alone,” she said. Online retailers could put effective safeguards in place that help to better identify sellers on their platforms; such safeguards could be especially helpful in dealing with counterfeits coming from China. “If online retailers are going to continue to make their platforms available to China-based sellers, then there should be some burden on those sellers to show that the products they’re selling are legitimate,” Ziegler said. She added that trademark owners dealing with counterfeits should be aggressive in their enforcement efforts, the most effective deterrent being filing lawsuits and forcing Internet stores to pay damages for counterfeits.

Unauthorized Distribution: Another Problem for Trademark Owners

Amazon’s counterfeit woes may be receiving much more mainstream attention in recent months, but it’s hardly the only problem the e-commerce giant has been having with unauthorized sales. Susan Frohling, Counsel at Brinks Gilson & Lione, has represented brand owners who sell luxury goods and who have had to deal with unauthorized sales of their genuine products on Amazon. Generally, these products are only supposed to be made available through a network of authorized dealers, but brand owners have difficulty controlling downstream access due to the first sale doctrine, which generally allows for resale of genuine products in an unchanged state. “Somehow the products get out of their normal distribution channel and they end up on Amazon,” Frohling said. “That can be very problematic in a luxury goods context, where a brand owner will want to protect pricing and provide consumers with a specialized sales force and warranties, which they miss out on when they buy the products online.”

Such unauthorized sales on Amazon could not only hurt a brand owner’s reputation with consumers if the Amazon retail price is much lower than the retail price through authorized dealers, it can hurt relationships with those dealers who feel the price difference is unfair. “Frankly, it’s a little easier to combat unauthorized sales on Amazon when it’s not a manufacturer selling the products on Amazon,” Frohling said. This is because Amazon collects material from the seller, including photographs and advertising copy, which may have been provided by the original brand owner. Once the manufacturer provides those materials, Amazon receives a sublicense to them and it makes it more difficult for brand owners to address the situation from a copyright standpoint through takedown notices.

Frohling offered some tips for brand owners to help prevent against these situations. Brand owners concerned about either counterfeits or unauthorized sales could use covert marking or watermarking techniques that are difficult for counterfeiters to replicate and can help to indicate the proper distribution channel if online sales aren’t preferred. It is also important to keep careful records of copyrightable materials, such as product images or advertising materials that can be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. “A copyright action is much more straightforward when a second or third party has appropriated copyrighted material, but it’s not easy to enforce if you don’t keep good records,” Frohling said. Brand owners wouldn’t have to file for copyright registration right away but could do so in the event that a manufacturer or someone else in the supply chain decides to embark on unauthorized sales on Amazon.

What Is Amazon Doing to Help?

Amazon is doing what it can to reassure the public that it has the infrastructure necessary to deal with its counterfeit issue. An Amazon spokesperson offered the following statement in response to a request for comment from IPWatchdog:

“Our customers expect that when they make a purchase through Amazon’s store—either directly from Amazon or from one of its millions of third-party sellers—they will receive authentic products, and we take any claims that endanger that seriously. We strictly prohibit the sale of counterfeit products and invest heavily—both funds and company energy—to ensure our policy against the sale of such products is followed. Our global team is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to respond to and take action on reported violations and notices of potential infringement.

In order to detect bad actors and potentially counterfeit products, we make significant investments in machine learning and automated systems. We employ dedicated teams of software engineers, research scientists, program managers, and investigators to operate and continually refine our anti-counterfeiting program. When a business registers to sell products through Amazon’s Marketplace, Amazon’s systems scan information for signals that the business might be a bad actor, and Amazon blocks identified bad actors before they can offer any products for sale. Amazon’s systems also automatically and continuously scan numerous data points related to sellers, products, brands, and offers to detect activity that indicates products offered might be counterfeit. Over 99% of all Amazon page views by our customers landed on pages that did not receive a notice of potential infringement.

Customers are always protected by our A-to-Z Guarantee, whether they make a purchase from Amazon or a third-party seller. If the product doesn’t arrive or isn’t as advertised, customers can contact our customer support for a full refund of their order.”

While this certainly pays effective lip service to the problem, Perrott felt that there was still reason to question Amazon’s ability to effectively weed out counterfeits. He noted that Amazon’s service reps who handle requests on taking down counterfeit items typically aren’t legal professionals and follow a strict script in how they’re able to respond to and pass along claims about counterfeit. “There have been identical takedown notices sent to Amazon and one gets denied but the other one gets accepted because they’ve been viewed by different service reps,” Perrott said. “If they can’t even get that right, the idea that an automated process would help seems unlikely.”

Although Amazon’s statistic on the 99% of customer page views seemed like a “beautifully cherry-picked” factoid, Perrott did acknowledge that it was likely true. “Even if it’s only 1 percent of page views, that’s still a major problem considering how big Amazon is,” Perrott said. “That has to be billions of page views on an annual basis.” That 99% also could include a large number of pages where infringing items are being sold but a notice of infringement hasn’t yet been sent to Amazon.

Finally, it appears that Amazon’s public statement may not exactly line up with what the company is telling shareholders. The statement from Amazon’s spokesperson indicates that customers can get a full refund on counterfeit purchases through the company’s A-to-Z Guarantee program. However, in the section of Amazon’s 10-K filing where it discusses the counterfeit problem, the company says that it “reimburse[s] buyers for payments up to certain limits.” The use of the phrase “certain limits” doesn’t seem to contemplate a full refund in all circumstances.

Image Source: Deposit Photos
Photography ID: 40325209
Copyright: wolterke 

The Author

Steve Brachmann

Steve Brachmann is a freelance journalist located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than a decade. He writes about technology and innovation. His work has been published by The Buffalo News, The Hamburg Sun, USAToday.com, Chron.com, Motley Fool and OpenLettersMonthly.com. Steve also provides website copy and documents for various business clients and is available for research projects and freelance work.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 8 Comments comments. Join the discussion.

  1. Benny February 28, 2019 5:30 am

    I would have thought that the major counterfeit product market is via direct import from China on platforms such as ebay, Alibaba, dx, etc. Doesn’t Amazon represent just a small fraction of the counterfeit product market?

  2. Anon February 28, 2019 8:50 am

    Benny,

    For argument’s sake, let’s take your provisio as a given state.

    Does that in any way change the culpability of Amazon?

    Does that in any way change the point of the article?

    As usual, your view merely aligned with the Efficient Infringer mantra, and the translation is “everybody’s doing it so there is no real harm, and it is merely “market-efficient.”

    Sorry, but (again) you miss at step one.

  3. Benny February 28, 2019 9:29 am

    Anon,
    You appear not to have read or understood my comment.
    Assuming that Amazon removes 100% of counterfeit products from its’ website, does that solve your problem? Or just 10% or 15% of the problem? You are going after the low hanging fruit, but making a small dent in the counterfeit market. What would be your next course of action, with the market still flooded with fakes offered on other platforms?

  4. Anon February 28, 2019 11:05 am

    I have read your comment and pointed out that you offer a smokescreen and a “redefining” of the issue presented of what Amazon specifically is doing.

    As I noted, your path is simply not the correct path.

    Further, to answer your question, once one takes out the (one of the) big perps, then the other perps could likewise be taken out.

    Just because a lot of people are doing wrong does not – cannot – make that doing wrong into something any less wrong.

  5. Anon February 28, 2019 11:07 am

    Also Benny, even as you mouth the typical mantra of Efficient Infringers, you seem to want to make it appear that you do not understand how “efficient Infringement” operates as a legal-political maneuver to drive “allowance” of infringement in order to BE “efficient.”

    I suggest that you may want to read up on the underlying mechanisms that your views so consistently mouth.

  6. Benny February 28, 2019 2:36 pm

    Anon,
    I give up. You didn’t understand my comment, and seen to have no idea of the distribution channels of counterfeit products, nor do you appreciate that counterfeit consumer goods are just a small part of the story, actually it extends way up the supply chain. Why you see my position as an excuse to waffle on about efficient infringement is beyond me, I would of thought that by now you would have cottoned on to the fact that I work for a legitimate manufacturer, and we can fall victim to counterfeit products both upstream (our suppliers) and downstream. And let me tell you, Amazon is the least of our worries

  7. Anon February 28, 2019 5:50 pm

    Benny,

    You should not give up – but you should realize the point that I am making here.

    I understand FULLY your comment. It appears though, that you just do not understand how your comment comes across. There is no doubt that your comment comes through a filter of your past positions – positions so entrenched in the Efficient Infringer mantra, that you may not even see that you spout that mantra.

    Whether or not you work for a “legitimate manufacturer,” the spouting that you do here – and its ties to the Efficient Infringer mantra – are simply stronger than the underlying counterfeit concern that you may legitimately be faced with.

    Thus, your choice of phrase “excuse to waffle” absolutely misses the point that you SHOULD be grasping.

    IF you want to talk about a DIFFERENT aspect of counterfeit danger, then you really should preface your post as being off-topic. As it is, your shift provides a context that matches with your past positions in a simply unflattering manner.

  8. Goats March 8, 2019 5:14 pm

    Benny,

    I think Amazon is increasingly becoming a bigger and bigger part of the problem with this stuff online. Hence them pushing to make some changes. I think they’re a good place to start because they clearly don’t like negative exposure and when pressure is applied they are likely to cave and at least half-ass something. Alibaba is a huge one for this problem, but it’s run by the Chinese, so good luck getting them to do anything. My GF tried to submit a claim because there is a Chinese vendor on Alibaba selling knockoffs of her art pieces. She couldn’t even proceed because she wasn’t in China.

Post a Comment

Respectfully add to the discussion.

Name *
Email *
Website