<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; IP News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>USPTO Seeks Public Input on Proposed Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/uspto-seeks-public-input-on-proposed-fees/id=22194/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/uspto-seeks-public-input-on-proposed-fees/id=22194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>U.S.P.T.O.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america invents act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the America Invents Act (AIA), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), for the first time in its history, was given the authority to work with IP stakeholders to set fees through the regulatory process. The agency took a first step towards that end this week when it published proposed fees for all of the patent services it provides.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/uspto-seeks-public-input-on-proposed-fees/id=22194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patents for Humanity Announced at White House Event</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/patents-for-humanity-announced-at-white-house-event/id=22166/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/patents-for-humanity-announced-at-white-house-event/id=22166/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accelerated examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american bar association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker McKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of patent appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of patent appeals and interferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Access in Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Health Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanitarian technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institutes of Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents for Humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reexamination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the honor of being invited to the White House today for the Innovation for Global Development Event, which was held in support of the President’s commitment to using harness the power of innovation to solve long-standing global development challenges.  As a part of this event, David Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, launched a pilot program dubbed Patents for Humanity, which is a voluntary prize competition for patent owners and licensees.  The pilot program seeks to encourage businesses of all kinds to apply their patented technology to addressing the world's humanitarian challenges.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/patents-for-humanity-announced-at-white-house-event/id=22166/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Congress Break the Internet?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/will-congress-break-the-internet/id=22143/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/will-congress-break-the-internet/id=22143/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Zeidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Zeidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Lemley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROTECT IP Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We must find reasonable ways to stop infringement of intellectual property on the Internet. Such a solution must be fair to the victim of the infringement. It must uphold the principles of the Constitution of the United States. And it must not break the Internet. SOPA and PIPA may not be perfect implementations of such protection, but they meet all of these requirements. There may be better strategies that can be reached through measured and thoughtful debate, but not through excessive hyperbole and misrepresentation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/08/will-congress-break-the-internet/id=22143/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crowdsourcing Patent Research: $2 Million in Reward Money</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article one partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheryl milone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stacey anderson-redick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article One Partners (AOP), the world’s largest patent research community, earlier today announced that the company has achieved a significant milestone — more than $2 million dollars in financial incentives to its global research community. This milestone comes 11 months to the day from when Article One announced that they had reached the $1 million award milestone. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Mass Aggregators: The Giants Among Us</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/06/patent-mass-aggregators-the-giants-among-us/id=22137/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/06/patent-mass-aggregators-the-giants-among-us/id=22137/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Ewing &#38; Robin Feldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acacia research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-practicing entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent mass aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent troll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Feldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ewing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The types of returns promised to investors and the types of benefits offered to participants are also quite different from garden-variety non-practicing entities, as are some of the tactics used in organizing the entities and in asserting the patents. Finally, the scale itself is simply mind-boggling. Mass aggregators operate on a scale and at a level of sophistication and complexity that would have been unimaginable a decade ago. They have taken the prototype strategies pioneered by a prior generation of non-practicing entities and changed them into some of the cleverest strategies yet seen in the intellectual property rights field.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/06/patent-mass-aggregators-the-giants-among-us/id=22137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive Interview Part 3: USPTO Deputy Director Terry Rea</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/05/exclusive-interview-part-3-uspto-deputy-director-terry-rea/id=22120/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/05/exclusive-interview-part-3-uspto-deputy-director-terry-rea/id=22120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews & Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deputy director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deputy Director of the USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rea interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teresa (Terry) Stanek Rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teresa rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teresa Stanek Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teresa stanek rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terry rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terry stanek rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We begin by discussing first action allowances and whether they are frowned upon, then discuss the examination process and weave our way to Track 1 and whether you really must use Track 1 for patents likely to be litigated because you get a much more condensed, streamlined prosecution history.  Over the past 10 days I have also interviewed  Peggy Focarino (Commissioner for Patents), Deborah Cohn (Commissioner for Trademarks) and Peter Pappas (Chief of Staff).  These interviews are being transcribed and prepared for publication.  So stay tuned.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/05/exclusive-interview-part-3-uspto-deputy-director-terry-rea/id=22120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stopping Online Piracy in the Age of Entitlement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/03/stopping-online-piracy-in-the-age-of-entitlement/id=22111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/03/stopping-online-piracy-in-the-age-of-entitlement/id=22111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chamber of commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital millennium copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protesters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca MacKinnon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for the particulars of SOPA, perhaps there are some who are against the legislation for valid, thoughtful reasons and would like to see something better.  That, however, seems to be the substantial minority.  Those who are against SOPA seem to want to protect online piracy as if they are entitled to access the creative works of others for free.  In economic terms those who steal intellectual property are freeloaders. These freeloaders are just like the many non-productive members of society who only take and give nothing back, expecting those of us who are productive to pick up the tab for them.  There are certainly people in society who need and deserve help, and we should be there to help them, but by any fair estimate the entitlement mentality is running amok.  No one "needs and deserves" free access to the latest blockbuster movie the opened just yesterday in theaters.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/03/stopping-online-piracy-in-the-age-of-entitlement/id=22111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark Skullduggery: Lawsuit Challenges Publication Service</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/02/trademark-skullduggery/id=22102/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/02/trademark-skullduggery/id=22102/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false and misleading claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Business Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leason Ellis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Schwimmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servicemark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Trademark Enterprises]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leason Ellis LLP, an intellectual property law firm located in White Plains, New York, recently filed a complaint against USA Trademark Enterprises, Inc. of Sarasota, Florida.  The multi-count Complaint alleges that USA Trademark Enterprises has engaged in false advertising and unfair competition by marketing a catalog of trademark registrations, which offers no value because the published information is freely available in the online records of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.  David Leason, Managing Partner of Leason Ellis, said “by targeting our clients and us, USA Trademark Enterprises has interfered in our business and cast a shadow over the legitimacy of trademark-related communications. In filing suit, we are out to protect our clients, our business, and the integrity of the trademark process from predatory and deceptive marketing.”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/02/trademark-skullduggery/id=22102/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive Interview Part 2: USPTO Deputy Director Teresa Rea</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/02/exclusive-interview-part-2-uspto-deputy-director-teresa-rea/id=22072/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/02/exclusive-interview-part-2-uspto-deputy-director-teresa-rea/id=22072/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews & Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deputy director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deputy Director of the USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rea interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teresa (Terry) Stanek Rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teresa rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teresa Stanek Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terry stanek rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 2 of my interview with Deputy Under Secretary Rea picks up with discussion of the America Invents Act. We generally discussed the rulemaking process, the fact that the post-grant proposed rules are a bit late in coming, comments and what the USPTO will do with them, as well as the upcoming Road Show the USPTO is taking across America for the purpose of discussing implementation of the America Invents Act.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/02/exclusive-interview-part-2-uspto-deputy-director-teresa-rea/id=22072/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job Opening: Patent Agent/Attorney in Silicon Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/01/job-opening-patent-agentattorney-in-silicon-valley/id=22074/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/01/job-opening-patent-agentattorney-in-silicon-valley/id=22074/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JobOrtunities™ Help Wanted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JobOrtunities™ Help Wanted Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney & Patent Agent Positions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our client seeks Patent Agent or Patent Attorney having a thorough knowledge in the area of thin film processing (e.g. in semiconductor / solar cell / LED). Will consider any previous experience as counting towards minimum 3-5 year requirement, whether gained in a law firm, an in-house position or as an independent contractor.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/01/job-opening-patent-agentattorney-in-silicon-valley/id=22074/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

