<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; Patent Fools&trade;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/category/patent-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Patent Applications, Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Much Ado About Nothing Over First to File</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/07/much-ado-about-nothing-over-first-to-file/id=7191/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/07/much-ado-about-nothing-over-first-to-file/id=7191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first to file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first to invent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprovisional patent application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provisional patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much Ado About Nothing Over First to File
Just about 24 hours ago I posted an article relating to my changing position with respect to first to file, and already there is something of a firestorm.  I understand there are those who feel I have abandoned them and adopted a naive view of the world. But [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/08/challenging-patent-reform-first-to-file-provision/id=2475/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Challenging Patent Reform First-to-File Provision'>Challenging Patent Reform First-to-File Provision</a><small>I recently received an e-mail from Ron Katznelson, who is the Founder and President of Bi-Level Technologies in Encinitas, CA.  Dr. Katznelson is a named inventor in more than 25 U.S. patents and his research and development interests include optimal signal design, digital RF signal processing, digital television, signal representation &amp; sampling theory, intellectual property [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/secretary-locke-promises-strongest-ip-protection-in-the-world/id=7182/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Secretary Locke Promises Strongest IP Protection in the World'>Secretary Locke Promises Strongest IP Protection in the World</a><small>I am just getting back from two days at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, having attended the 14th Annual Inventors Conference.  There is much to report, and much to write about, and I will continue to digest, analyze and write about what I saw and my impressions in the days to come.  It [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/kappos-talks-patent-reform-at-uspto-inventors-conference/id=7172/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Kappos Talks Patent Reform at USPTO Inventors Conference'>Kappos Talks Patent Reform at USPTO Inventors Conference</a><small>The 14th Annual Inventors Conference is presently ongoing at the United States Patent and Trademark Office in Alexandria, Virginia.  The conference started yesterday and continues today.  I am here at the USPTO presently, and I was here yesterday as well and had an opportunity to hear Patent Office Director David Kappos address the attendees during [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/07/much-ado-about-nothing-over-first-to-file/id=7191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secretary Locke Promises Strongest IP Protection in the World</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/secretary-locke-promises-strongest-ip-protection-in-the-world/id=7182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/secretary-locke-promises-strongest-ip-protection-in-the-world/id=7182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob stoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary locke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventors conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent backlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent pendency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peggy focarino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharon barner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Secretary Locke Promises Strongest IP Protection in the WorldI am just getting back from two days at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, having attended the 14th Annual Inventors Conference.  There is much to report, and much to write about, and I will continue to digest, analyze and write about what I saw and [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/09/17/rob-clarke-named-new-uspto-chief-of-staff/id=6213/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Rob Clarke Named New USPTO Chief of Staff'>Rob Clarke Named New USPTO Chief of Staff</a><small>Yet another high profile senior level management position has been filed at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and the trend of qualified &#8220;get it&#8221; people continues.  Rob Clarke, who is currently the Director of the Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA), has been asked by Director David Kappos to become the new USPTO [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/08/david-kappos-confirmed-as-uspto-director/id=4813/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: David Kappos Confirmed as USPTO Director'>David Kappos Confirmed as USPTO Director</a><small>With no notice to the public, and after the Senate was reported to have adjourned for their August recess, on Friday, August 7, 2009, David Kappos was confirmed as Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. While I applaud the quick action by the Senate to [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/06/obama-friend-appointed-to-be-deputy-at-uspto/id=6459/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Obama Friend Appointed to be Deputy at USPTO'>Obama Friend Appointed to be Deputy at USPTO</a><small>On Friday, October 2, 2009. U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke appointed Sharon Barner to the post of deputy director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reporter John Schmid reported yesterday that in a telephone interview with Barner she explained that she is a long time associate of President Barack [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/secretary-locke-promises-strongest-ip-protection-in-the-world/id=7182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kappos Talks Patent Reform at USPTO Inventors Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/kappos-talks-patent-reform-at-uspto-inventors-conference/id=7172/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/kappos-talks-patent-reform-at-uspto-inventors-conference/id=7172/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first to file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first to invent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventors conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kappos Talks Patent Reform at USPTO Inventors ConferenceThe 14th Annual Inventors Conference is presently ongoing at the United States Patent and Trademark Office in Alexandria, Virginia.  The conference started yesterday and continues today.  I am here at the USPTO presently, and I was here yesterday as well and had an opportunity to hear Patent Office [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/06/27/independent-inventors-conference-pto/id=179/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Independent Inventors Conference @ PTO'>Independent Inventors Conference @ PTO</a><small>The 13th annual Independent Inventors Conference will be held on the campus of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in Alexandria, Virginia August 8-9. A pre-conference workshop, for anyone interested in learning about the basics of patents and the importance of intellectual property protection, will be held on August 7 from 5 to [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/09/22/kappos-lays-out-ambitious-agenda-for-uspto-in-speech-at-ipo/id=6318/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Kappos Lays Out Ambitious Agenda for USPTO in Speech at IPO'>Kappos Lays Out Ambitious Agenda for USPTO in Speech at IPO</a><small>Last week David Kappos addressed the IPO annual meeting in Chicago, Illinois.  Kappos&#8217; remarks were varied and really set a new tone for the future of the USPTO under his watch.  Kappos continued the theme he has already established in differentiating how the USPTO will run under his regime, as compared to how it ran [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/08/david-kappos-confirmed-as-uspto-director/id=4813/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: David Kappos Confirmed as USPTO Director'>David Kappos Confirmed as USPTO Director</a><small>With no notice to the public, and after the Senate was reported to have adjourned for their August recess, on Friday, August 7, 2009, David Kappos was confirmed as Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. While I applaud the quick action by the Senate to [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/kappos-talks-patent-reform-at-uspto-inventors-conference/id=7172/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gene Quinn Declared Patent Twit of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/gene-quinn-declared-patent-twit-of-the-week/id=7161/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/gene-quinn-declared-patent-twit-of-the-week/id=7161/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-patent Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albert einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david koepsell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephan kinsella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swiss patent office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gene Quinn Declared Patent Twit of the WeekI just so happened to stumble across an interesting article declaring me Patent Twit of the Week.  Normally one would not be proud of being declared a &#8220;twit,&#8221; but I have to say that I am enormously proud of this recognition.  It seems that The Center for a [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/quinn-and-koepsell-discuss-gene-patents-on-grittv/id=7087/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Quinn and Koepsell Discuss Gene Patents on GritTV'>Quinn and Koepsell Discuss Gene Patents on GritTV</a><small>Last Monday, October 26, 2009, I had the opportunity to discuss gene patents on GritTV with host Laura Flanders. I appeared on the show via Skype video along with David Koepsell, the author of Who Owns You? , who was in the studio. I was supposed to be in New York City with [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/05/beware-the-anti-patent-misdirection-and-lies/id=6455/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Beware the Anti-Patent Misdirection and Lies'>Beware the Anti-Patent Misdirection and Lies</a><small>Anyone who has been reading IPWatchdog.com over the last several days knows that anti-patent advocates have been lambasting me for taking the position that patents are not evil and that more than a 0 year patent term is appropriate.  This debate was progressing about as well as you could expect I suppose.  I was making [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/09/29/reality-check-anti-patent-patent-musings/id=6410/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Reality Check: Anti-Patent Patent Musings Simply Bizarre'>Reality Check: Anti-Patent Patent Musings Simply Bizarre</a><small>I stumbled across an interesting article today from The Post and Courier regarding how interest in US patents is picking up in Cuba.  First, it was interesting enough to learn that it is possible for companies and individuals in Cuba to obtain a US patent given how Cuba and the US have been on rather [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/gene-quinn-declared-patent-twit-of-the-week/id=7161/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilski: Eyewitness Report and Expert Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/bilski-eyewitness-report-and-expert-analysis/id=7150/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/bilski-eyewitness-report-and-expert-analysis/id=7150/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business method patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer related inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douglas nemec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot topic briefing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott alter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bilski: Eyewitness Report and Expert Analysisn Monday, November 9, 2009, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the much anticipated Bilski case, which could well decide once and for all whether business methods and software remain patentable in the United States.  I will be in attendance at the oral argument, which [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/01/history-of-software-patents-iii-in-re-alappat/id=7059/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: History of Software Patents III: In re Alappat'>History of Software Patents III: In re Alappat</a><small>On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a landmark decision in In re Bilski. The United States Supreme Court has accepted the Bilski case and will hold oral arguments on Monday, November 9, 2009. My plan is to be present for the oral arguments, and I [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/01/us-supreme-court-grants-cert-in-bilski/id=3865/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in Bilski'>US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in Bilski</a><small>On Monday, June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Bilski v. Doll.  This means that the last chapter on business methods and software has not yet been written, which could be good news or bad news depending upon your particular take.  I have wondered out loud about allowing software patents as [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/29/how-to-patent-software-in-a-post-bilski-era/id=4311/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to Patent Software in a Post Bilski Era'>How to Patent Software in a Post Bilski Era</a><small>Those familiar with the ongoing debate regarding the patentability of software and business methods know, the United States Supreme Court has decided to take up In re Bilski during its next term, which will start in October 2009.  In the meantime, what exactly do you do if you want to patent software or computer related [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/bilski-eyewitness-report-and-expert-analysis/id=7150/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fired Up: Challenging the Constitutionality of the Patent Act</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/03/fired-up-challenging-the-constitutionality-of-the-patent-act/id=7144/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/03/fired-up-challenging-the-constitutionality-of-the-patent-act/id=7144/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-patent Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamond v. chakrabarty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge robert sweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myriad genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fired Up: Challenging the Constitutionality of the Patent ActThe Plaintiffs allege that because human genes should not be patented.  Hardly something that anyone can argue.  The only trouble is that this is not what the US Patent Office allows, and it is not what Myriad Genetics has been granted a patent on.  Nevertheless, the frivolous [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/district-court-rules-aclu-gene-patent-challenge-may-proceed/id=7115/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: District Court Rules ACLU Gene Patent Challenge May Proceed'>District Court Rules ACLU Gene Patent Challenge May Proceed</a><small>In one of the worst opinions I have ever read from any federal court, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled earlier today that the ACLU challenge against the Myriad Genetics patents and the United States Patent and Trademark Office for issuing patents can proceed. Procedurally the posture [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/06/secretary-locke-promises-strongest-ip-protection-in-the-world/id=7182/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Secretary Locke Promises Strongest IP Protection in the World'>Secretary Locke Promises Strongest IP Protection in the World</a><small>I am just getting back from two days at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, having attended the 14th Annual Inventors Conference.  There is much to report, and much to write about, and I will continue to digest, analyze and write about what I saw and my impressions in the days to come.  It [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/quinn-and-koepsell-discuss-gene-patents-on-grittv/id=7087/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Quinn and Koepsell Discuss Gene Patents on GritTV'>Quinn and Koepsell Discuss Gene Patents on GritTV</a><small>Last Monday, October 26, 2009, I had the opportunity to discuss gene patents on GritTV with host Laura Flanders. I appeared on the show via Skype video along with David Koepsell, the author of Who Owns You? , who was in the studio. I was supposed to be in New York City with [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/03/fired-up-challenging-the-constitutionality-of-the-patent-act/id=7144/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>District Court Rules ACLU Gene Patent Challenge May Proceed</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/district-court-rules-aclu-gene-patent-challenge-may-proceed/id=7115/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/district-court-rules-aclu-gene-patent-challenge-may-proceed/id=7115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge robert sweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myriad genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prudential standing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[District Court Rules ACLU Gene Patent Challenge May ProceedIn one of the worst opinions I have ever read from any federal court, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled earlier today that the ACLU challenge against the Myriad Genetics patents and the United States Patent and Trademark Office for [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/08/uspto-agrees-to-withdraw-claims-continuations-rules/id=6485/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: USPTO Agrees to Withdraw Claims &#038; Continuations Rules'>USPTO Agrees to Withdraw Claims &#038; Continuations Rules</a><small> PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO&#8217;s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. David J. Kappos and the [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/03/fired-up-challenging-the-constitutionality-of-the-patent-act/id=7144/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Fired Up: Challenging the Constitutionality of the Patent Act'>Fired Up: Challenging the Constitutionality of the Patent Act</a><small>The Plaintiffs allege that because human genes should not be patented.  Hardly something that anyone can argue.  The only trouble is that this is not what the US Patent Office allows, and it is not what Myriad Genetics has been granted a patent on.  Nevertheless, the frivolous ACLU lawsuit that seeks to use the US [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/06/federal-circuit-to-rehear-tafas-and-gsk-v-doll/id=4508/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Federal Circuit to Rehear Tafas and GSK v. Doll'>Federal Circuit to Rehear Tafas and GSK v. Doll</a><small>On Monday, July 6, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (minus Judge Lourie who did not participate in the poll of judges) decided to rehear the claims and continuations rule challenge of Tafas and GlaxoSmithKline en banc.  Additionally, the CAFC has vacated the panel decision that awarded a victory to [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/district-court-rules-aclu-gene-patent-challenge-may-proceed/id=7115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rest in Peace Friend: Robert H. Rines, 1922 &#8211; 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/rest-in-peace-friend-robert-h-rines-1922-2009/id=7097/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/rest-in-peace-friend-robert-h-rines-1922-2009/id=7097/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Famous Inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob rines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fplc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[franklin pierce law center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventors hall of fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national inventors hall of fame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rest in Peace Friend: Robert H. Rines, 1922 &#8211; 2009It is with great sadness that I am writing to inform that Robert H. Rines passed away on Sunday, November 1, 2009.  Bob was a patent lawyer, an inventor and the founder of Franklin Pierce Law Center, where I received both my JD and LL.M. degrees.  [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/03/18/inventors-hall-of-fame-moves-to-uspto/id=2197/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Inventors Hall of Fame Moves to USPTO'>Inventors Hall of Fame Moves to USPTO</a><small>The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced the opening of the National Inventors Hall of Fame in the museum of its Alexandria, Va., campus. The Hall of Fame honors and encourages the men and women responsible for the great technological advances that make human, social and economic progress possible. The Hall of [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/rest-in-peace-friend-robert-h-rines-1922-2009/id=7097/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quinn and Koepsell Discuss Gene Patents on GritTV</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/quinn-and-koepsell-discuss-gene-patents-on-grittv/id=7087/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/quinn-and-koepsell-discuss-gene-patents-on-grittv/id=7087/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-patent Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david koepsell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grittv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laura flanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myriad genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who owns you]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quinn and Koepsell Discuss Gene Patents on GritTVLast Monday, October 26, 2009, I had the opportunity to discuss gene patents on GritTV with host Laura Flanders.  I appeared on the show via Skype video along with David Koepsell, the author of Who Owns You? , who was in the studio.  I was supposed [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/gene-quinn-declared-patent-twit-of-the-week/id=7161/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gene Quinn Declared Patent Twit of the Week'>Gene Quinn Declared Patent Twit of the Week</a><small>I just so happened to stumble across an interesting article declaring me Patent Twit of the Week.  Normally one would not be proud of being declared a &#8220;twit,&#8221; but I have to say that I am enormously proud of this recognition.  It seems that The Center for a Stateless Society has declared me a patent [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/22/setting-the-record-straight-on-gene-patents/id=4202/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Setting the Record Straight on Gene Patents'>Setting the Record Straight on Gene Patents</a><small>On Wednesday, June 17, 2009, while I was on the road in Boston teaching the PLI Patent Bar Review Course I was invited to chat with David Gleason, the host of State of the Nation, which is a radio talk show that airs in South Africa.  It seems that Mr. Gleason and his staff were [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/17/the-history-of-gene-patents-part-i/id=4161/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The History of Gene Patents Part I'>The History of Gene Patents Part I</a><small>First, let me say that it is really a complete misnomer to refer to &#8220;gene patents&#8221; because despite what the popular press may write, and perhaps believe, genes are not patented.  Nevertheless, I will cave into the masses and concede (at least for now) the linguistic high ground and refer to gene-related innovations that are [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/02/quinn-and-koepsell-discuss-gene-patents-on-grittv/id=7087/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History of Software Patents III: In re Alappat</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/01/history-of-software-patents-iii-in-re-alappat/id=7059/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/01/history-of-software-patents-iii-in-re-alappat/id=7059/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alappat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer related inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of software patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History of Software Patents III: In re AlappatOn October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a landmark decision in In re Bilski. The United States Supreme Court has accepted the Bilski case and will hold oral arguments on Monday, November 9, 2009.  My plan is to be [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/04/bilski-eyewitness-report-and-expert-analysis/id=7150/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bilski: Eyewitness Report and Expert Analysis'>Bilski: Eyewitness Report and Expert Analysis</a><small>n Monday, November 9, 2009, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the much anticipated Bilski case, which could well decide once and for all whether business methods and software remain patentable in the United States. I will be in attendance at the oral argument, which will take place after a [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/01/24/the-history-of-software-patents/id=1772/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The History of Software Patents'>The History of Software Patents</a><small>Since the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. Benson the law surrounding the patentability of software has changed considerably, leaving many to wonder whether software is patentable at all. Originally in Benson, the Supreme Court decided that software was not patentable, but then later retracted the blanket [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/01/history-of-software-patents-arrhythmia-research/id=2399/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: History of Software Patents II: Arrhythmia Research'>History of Software Patents II: Arrhythmia Research</a><small>On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a landmark decision in In re Bilski.  As those who read IPWatchdog.com regularly know, it is my belief that software should be patentable subject matter, and patenting software is not the same as patenting math.  Notwithstanding, that there are a good [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/11/01/history-of-software-patents-iii-in-re-alappat/id=7059/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sued for Patent Infringement Over Chrome Courgette</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/31/google-sued-for-patent-infringement-over-chrome-courgette/id=7021/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/31/google-sued-for-patent-infringement-over-chrome-courgette/id=7021/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baker botts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courgette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david vs goliath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwyer collora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent ambush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent troll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red bend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=7021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Sued for Patent Infringement Over Chrome CourgetteOn Monday, October 26, 2009, Google, Inc. was sued for patent infringement relating to its new Chrome browser by Red Bend, Ltd., an Israeli corporation and Red Bend Software, a Delaware corporation located in Waltham, Massachusetts.  Red Bend, Ltd. is the owner of US Patent No. 6,546,552, and [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/12/26/patent-troll-sues-google-apple-microsoft/id=1148/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Patent Troll Sues Google, Apple &#038; Microsoft'>Patent Troll Sues Google, Apple &#038; Microsoft</a><small>Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Google, Microsoft and Apple! On Monday, December 23, 2008, Cygnus Systems, Inc., sometimes referred to on the web as Troll Systems, sued three of the largest patent troll targets there are; namely the aforementioned Google, Apple and Microsoft.  The patent in question, US Patent No. 7,346,850, which relates [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/30/amazon-software-patent-shakespeare-copyright-infringement/id=6999/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: New Amazon Software Patent, Shakespeare &#038; © Infringement'>New Amazon Software Patent, Shakespeare &#038; © Infringement</a><small>Earlier this week, on October 27, 2009, Amazon Technologies, Inc., received US Patent No. 7,610,382, which relates to a computer implemented method of marking copies of content distributed on a network. More specifically, the patent discloses and claims a variety of embodiments of a method and associated apparatus for programmatically substituting synonyms into text [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/04/why-all-small-businesses-need-software-patents/id=6447/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why All Small Businesses Need Software Patents'>Why All Small Businesses Need Software Patents</a><small>Over the last week a heated debate has been raging here on IPWatchdog.com regarding whether patents should exist at all. See Reality Check: Anti-Patent Patent Musings Simply Bizarre and Responding to Critics: My View on Patents &amp; Innovation. I have offered a point by point debate where everyone answers the same question in [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/31/google-sued-for-patent-infringement-over-chrome-courgette/id=7021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Amazon Software Patent, Shakespeare &amp; © Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/30/amazon-software-patent-shakespeare-copyright-infringement/id=6999/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/30/amazon-software-patent-shakespeare-copyright-infringement/id=6999/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ksr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ksr v. teleflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pontiac grand am]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Amazon Software Patent, Shakespeare &#038; © InfringementEarlier this week, on October 27, 2009, Amazon Technologies, Inc., received US Patent No. 7,610,382, which relates to a computer implemented method of marking copies of content distributed on a network.  More specifically, the patent discloses and claims a variety of embodiments of a method and associated [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/15/is-software-patentable/id=4130/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is Software Patentable?'>Is Software Patentable?</a><small>I am a software engineer who writes about that topic and related areas of computer science. Recently, I published an article titled Software Engineering != Computer Science, which discusses the differences between programming and formal (mathematical) computer science. In response to that article, IPWatchdog.com kindly invited me to comment about some of the controversy surrounding [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/02/software-new-engine-must-be-patentable/id=4371/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Software is the New Engine and Must be Patentable'>Software is the New Engine and Must be Patentable</a><small>I have long since lost hope that those who are truly anti-patent and anti-software zealots will ever come to accept that software should be patentable. For reasons that are beyond me they will not even admit that software can be patented. Talking to such a lunatic fringe is hardly worth the time it [...]...</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/04/why-all-small-businesses-need-software-patents/id=6447/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why All Small Businesses Need Software Patents'>Why All Small Businesses Need Software Patents</a><small>Over the last week a heated debate has been raging here on IPWatchdog.com regarding whether patents should exist at all. See Reality Check: Anti-Patent Patent Musings Simply Bizarre and Responding to Critics: My View on Patents &amp; Innovation. I have offered a point by point debate where everyone answers the same question in [...]...</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/30/amazon-software-patent-shakespeare-copyright-infringement/id=6999/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
