Today's Date: April 21, 2014 Search | Home | Contact | Services | Patent Attorney | Patent Search | Provisional Patent Application | Patent Application | Software Patent | Confidentiality Agreements

Most Recent Articles on IPWatchdog.com


Antitrust Issues in College Athletics: Should Needle Apply

Posted: Tuesday, Jun 28, 2011 @ 1:04 pm | Written by Beth Hutchens | 4 comments
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Antitrust, Beth Hutchens, Guest Contributors, IP News, IPWatchdog.com Articles, Trademark

Earlier this month Dechert LLP, representing an undisclosed number of companies (“stakeholders”),  sent a letter to IMG College (“IMG”) and its licensing division, the Collegiate Licensing Company (“CLC”), and demanded that IMG and CLC cease and desist any efforts to restrict the number of licensees permitted to supply merchandise bearing the brands of various NCAA colleges and universities.  It looks likes trademark and antitrust issues are back on the menu in sports, which makes intellectual property nerds like me very happy.  We all knew American Needle Inc. v. National Football League (“Needle”) would embolden private antitrust suits; it was just a question of when.   But a pivotal question is should Needle be extended to permit private antitrust suits in collegiate athletics?  If the answer to those questions is yes, what would be the purpose at this point?





Facebook Facial Recognition Tool Poses New Security Threats

Posted: Monday, Jun 27, 2011 @ 8:11 pm | Written by Renee C. Quinn | 2 comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Facebook, IPWatchdog.com Articles, Renee Quinn, Social Media

Although Facebook originally discussed the use of facial recognition technology in a small blog post on the site back in December, it was listed as unavailable until earlier this month.  The social media giant released its new Autotag facial-recognition tool that will allow users to autotag photos of their friends based on what they look like. But what was most odd about this release is that they did so quietly and under the radar with little thought to the risks that could be associated with the tool.  Rather than having the ability to opt-in to this new tool, you have to go into your settings and opt-out.  With more than 500 million active users, even if you choose not to be tagged in photos, it is inevitable that you and perhaps even your small children are being tagged by others without your knowledge.





The Top 10 Things New Patent Practitioners Should Know

Posted: Sunday, Jun 26, 2011 @ 3:45 pm | Written by Gene Quinn | 6 comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Attorneys, Gene Quinn, IP News, IPWatchdog.com Articles, Patents

I am currently in San Francisco, California, teaching the PLI patent bar review course.  Our next live stop will be Boston from July 11-15, and then on to Chicago from August 2-6.

Wherever we go we always get large numbers of individuals who are currently in law school, have recently graduated law school or are engineers or scientists looking to change careers. During one of the breaks between sessions on day 1 here in San Francisco one of the students taking the course asked me a question that we receive quite a lot, which is: Once I pass the exam how do I learn to actually do this?  Like so many things in life experience is the best teacher, but finding a job without some experience can be extremely difficult.

As I started discussing some ways to learn the craft I noticed a growing number of students eavesdropping . Soon there were a handful of students in the conversation and still more in their seats listening in.  After hours on day 2 of the course I stuck around and gave some advice and answered questions from those who are new to the industry and looking to learn the craft.  As a result of that discussion, and many other similar conversations over the years, I thought I would put together a top 10 list of things that new patent practitioners should know.





With Social Media, YOU Are Your Brand

Posted: Friday, Jun 24, 2011 @ 4:20 pm | Written by Renee C. Quinn | 2 comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Brand Building, Business, Internet, IP News, IPWatchdog.com Articles, LinkedIn, Marketing, Renee Quinn, Social Media, Social Networking, Trademark Basics, Twitter

With social media, You Are Your Brand. But what exactly does that mean? If you are part of a larger firm or business, you may be using social media to promote the products and services your company/firm offers, but you are doing so as an individual. Social media is about sharing content and building relationships. The general voice of your company/firm would not work in social media, nor in face to face networking for that matter, without each individual representative of the company displaying their own personalities and adding unique insight which ultimately is what attracts new, potential clients.





Stay Ordered: Paul Allen Patent Litigation Takes Abrupt Detour

Posted: Friday, Jun 24, 2011 @ 1:33 pm | Written by Scott M. Daniels | 3 comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Guest Contributors, IP News, IPWatchdog.com Articles, Patent Litigation, Patents, Reissue & Reexamination, Scott Daniels

Paul Allen

Paul Allen’s road to monetize his huge patent portfolio took an abrupt detour when Judge Marsha Peckham of the Western District of Washington stayed Allen’s eleven infringement cases, pending completion of reexamination proceedings for the patents-in-suit.

Allen, a co-founder or Microsoft, established Interval Research Corporation and then set about acquiring an enormous number of patents, assigning them to Interval Research.  For years, his patents sat quietly as idle assets.  The subject of constant speculation in the high-tech community, Allen’s patents remained untested.  But on August 27, 2010, Allen, through corporate subsidiary Interval Licensing, sued a who’s-who of computer and Internet companies in the District Court in Seattle, notably AOL, Apple, eBay, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, Yahoo!, and YouTube.  Apart from a minor hic-up in December, when Judge Peckham ordered Interval Licensing to state the basis for its infringement allegations with greater specificity, see Complaint Dismissed, the case proceeded smoothly.





Patent Reform: House Passes America Invents Act 304-117

Posted: Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 @ 6:33 pm | Written by Gene Quinn | 20 comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Congress, Gene Quinn, IP News, IPWatchdog.com Articles, Patent Reform, Patents, USPTO

Congressman Lamar Smith (R-TX)

At approximately 5:50pm the United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 1249, which is known as the America Invents Act, by a vote of 304-117.  This bill differs from the Senate version of patent reform, S. 23, so there will be no bill going to the desk of President Obama just yet.  There are important differences between the two bills, chief among them is funding for the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  The bill passed by the Senate put an end to the practice of fee diversion, which occurs when the Congress appropriates the USPTO less than they collect in fees.  The excess in the fees collected from users of the USPTO then go to the federal government as general revenues and are used for purposes other than the operation of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.





Handwriting on the Wall: House Passes Managers Amendment to America Invents Act

Posted: Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 @ 3:19 pm | Written by Gene Quinn | 1 Comment »
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Congress, Gene Quinn, IP News, IPWatchdog.com Articles, Patent Reform, Patents

Shortly after 2pm Eastern Time the United States House of Representatives voted on the Managers Amendment to the America Invents Act, H.R. 1249.  The Managers Amendment passed by a vote of 283 – 140.  The House then proceeded to address several amendments to H.R. 1249.  It seems that there will be a vote on H.R. 1249 later today, and the way the amendments are going it seems as if the House will pass patent reform.





Lack of Commitment on PTO Funding is Killing Patent Reform

Posted: Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 @ 11:57 pm | Written by Gene Quinn | 20 comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: Congress, Gene Quinn, IP News, IPWatchdog.com Articles, Patent Reform, Patents, USPTO

Congressman Hal Rogers (R-KY)

The one thing in the Senate version of patent reform that everyone agreed on was the end to fee diversion.  The House of Representatives, however, has decided that an end to fee diversion should not be included in patent reform, which is causing a great unease within the industry.

The Senate had struggled with patent reform for years, and in February 2011 they broke through with a carefully crafted balance.  The Senate version of patent reform is light on “reform” in any real sense, except for one.  The Senate voted to end the practice of diverting fees collected by the Patent and Trademark Office to other, completely unrelated purposes.  The House of Representatives, lead by Congressman Hal Rogers (R-KY) who is Chair of the Appropriations Committee, demanded that the USPTO do with the amount of funds appropriators want to give the Office, not the amount of funds collected from users who pay for the Office.  This is causing many industry groups to openly withdraw support and fight against patent reform; a remarkable turn of events.