Today's Date: November 29, 2014 Search | Home | Contact | Services | Patent Attorney | Patent Search | Provisional Patent Application | Patent Application | Software Patent | Confidentiality Agreements

IPO Awards Ceremony - December 9, 2014

Each year the IPO hosts one of the best nights of the year, celebrating a new National Inventor of the Year, recognizing another Distinguished IP Professional for a lifetime of commitment to the industry, and awarding children and teens for creating videos that explain the importance of intellectual property. This year the event will take place at the Smithsonian American Art Museum & National Portrait Gallery, which is the location of the Old Patent Office Building in Washington, DC.. The event begins with cocktails at 7pm and is followed by a dinner and awards ceremony that will begin at 8pm. For more information please visit 2014 IPO Education Foundation Awards Dinner.

 

On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Dr. Hugh Herr will be named Inventor of the Year for 2014 by the IPO Education Foundation. The Inventor of the Year award is given to an inventor whose creations have made a significant impact the economy or quality of life. Dr. Herr is head of the Biomechatronics research group at the MIT Media Lab where his research focuses on creating bionic limbs that emulate the function of natural limbs by bringing together the fields physiology and electromechanics. Dr. Herr is being honored for his work on the BiOM® T2 System.

 

On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Judge Richard Linn of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will be named the 2014 Distinguished IP Professional by the IPO Education Foundation.  According to the IPO Award is given to an individual who has demonstrated extraordinary leadership in the IP community and a lifetime commitment to invention and innovation. Judge Linn has seen the industry from a variety of vantage points through his distinguished career, and in so many different ways he is one of us. To read our recent interview with Judge Linn please see Judge Richard Linn, First and Foremost a Patent Attorney.

 


Most Recent Articles on IPWatchdog.com


Faegre Baker Daniels Seeks Patent Agent for Denver Office

Posted: Sunday, Oct 12, 2014 @ 8:00 am | Written by JobOrtunities™ Help Wanted | 1 Comment »

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP seeks a patent agent with a degree in electrical engineering, computer science or physics to join our thriving Intellectual Property Group in our Denver office. Faegre Baker Daniels is an Am Law 100 firm with offices located throughout the U.S., Europe, and China. Our IP practice includes all areas of intellectual property law for a national and international client base.

QUALIFICATIONS

Successful candidates will have 2+ years patent drafting and prosecution experience and be a member of the patent bar. Excellent verbal and written communication skills are essential. This position offers competitive compensation and unlimited potential for professional growth. All candidates should have excellent academic credentials, strong writing skills and professional recommendations.

INTERESTED CANDIDATES





Why Inventors Should Not Rely On Their Own Search

Posted: Saturday, Oct 11, 2014 @ 8:00 am | Written by Mark Nowotarski | 6 comments

Perhaps you have an idea for a new product simmering in the back of your mind. You’ve done a few Google searches, but haven’t found anything similar. This makes you confident that you have stumbled upon the NEXT BIG THING.

Every day inventors tell me they “haven’t found anything like it,” and while that’s a good start, chances are that they haven’t been looking in the right places.

Before investing additional money and resources, it’s the right time to find out definitively if the invention is unique, determine if there is a market for it, and explore how to make it better.

Inventors should do a search online with a goal of finding two or three competitive products.  If they’re scared to do the search, that’s a good thing, because in my experience, it usually means they’re on the right track.





USPTO and the State Intellectual Property Office of China Launch Direct Electronic Priority Document Exchange

Posted: Friday, Oct 10, 2014 @ 11:28 am | Written by U.S.P.T.O. | 1 Comment »

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) today launched a new free service that will allow the two offices to electronically exchange patent application priority documents directly. This new service will help streamline the patent application process and reduce costs for businesses which are increasingly pursuing patent rights globally.

The new service will allow the USPTO and the SIPO, with appropriate permissions, to obtain electronic copies of priority documents filed with the other office from its electronic records management system at no cost to the applicant. With this new service, applicants will no longer need to obtain and file paper copies of the priority documents; however, they are still responsible for ensuring that priority documents are provided in a timely manner.





A Patent Eligibility in Crisis: A Conversation with Bob Stoll

Posted: Friday, Oct 10, 2014 @ 9:00 am | Written by Gene Quinn | 4 comments

Bob Stoll

On September 4, 2014, I had the opportunity to do a webinar conversation with Bob Stoll, former Commissioner for Patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office and current partner at Drinker Biddle in Washington, D.C. Our wide ranging discussion lasted for just over one hour. This conversation, the first of many, was made possible with support from Innography, which is one of our sponsors on IPWatchdog.com. You can access the entire recording, which is free, by visiting Patent Eligibility in a Time of Patent Turmoil.

What follows is a bit of our conversation to wet your appetite. We discuss the Supreme Court generally, the lack of technical expertise at the Supreme Court, the realities of creating software, amicus briefs, the ramifications for watering down patent rights, the need for bright line rules and whether Congress needs to get involved.

STOLL: As someone very interested in the patent arena and getting the standards correct, I’ve been really worrying about things. I think we are in a very confusing state at the moment. I think that the courts are actually undermining patent eligibility in many different areas. And the irony seems to be, Gene, that the Supreme Court and now this Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit seem to be not considering the fact that the United States is leading in many of these emerging technologies and specifically thinking about software and diagnostic methods and personalized medicine and gene sequences. I mean we are actually leading the world in this subject matter. We’ve developed these emerging technologies. We’re quite good at building upon a base of patents in these areas and I don’t think anybody’s taking into consideration the job creation and economic growth that these industries bring to the United States before mucking around in the standards.





Celebrating 15 Years of IPWatchdog.com

Posted: Friday, Oct 10, 2014 @ 8:00 am | Written by Gene Quinn | 12 comments

On October 10, 1999, I remember sitting at my desk in my apartment in Winter Park, Florida. I had just starting teaching as a full time law school professor several months earlier. So many things have changed since then. I’ve moved all over the country, I’ve traveled all over the country, I’ve gotten married, we navigated the near collapse of the U.S. economy and like so many, the near collapse of our personal economy. My mother passed in 2012, which was undoubtedly the lowest moment in my entire life. A year later my father-in-law also passed. While there have no doubt been trying times, we have shared many great moments personally, and with those in our community who have become our friends. But since October 10, 1999, the one constant for me has been IPWatchdog.com, which went live for the first time 15 years ago today.

It has been an honor and privilege to get to know so many wonderful people in our industry over the last 15 years, to talk to many industry leaders on the record, and to in some small way continue to push the debate forward with respect to how critically important patents are to businesses and the U.S. economy. Of course, without readers none of this would be possible. So thank you so very much for continuing to come back day after day, week after week, month after month!





Toshiba Patents: From Memory Devices to Smarter Retail Stores and Seawater Desalination

Posted: Thursday, Oct 9, 2014 @ 8:00 am | Written by Steve Brachmann | No Comments »

The Toshiba Corporation (TOSBF) of Tokyo, Japan, is an electronics and technology conglomerate that is responsible for a great deal of global innovation in semiconductors and computing solutions. Currently, the corporation is in a major restructuring phase for its personal computer division, which Toshiba recently accelerated by reducing its global PC workforce by 20 percent, or about 900 workers. Although Toshiba’s restructuring will create more focus on business-to-business services, the recent release of the Toshiba Encore Mini shows that the company is not abandoning consumer markets. Toshiba’s data analytics technologies will also be used as part of a partnership with Johns Hopkins University for using data analysis to adjust and improve cancer treatments.

Today’s Companies We Follow column focuses on Toshiba innovations which have been filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We found a wide assortment of novel technologies expressed in recent patent applications filed by the company. A couple of patent applications would protect technologies for identifying people captured within video feeds. We share a trio of patent applications discussing improvements to memory devices, especially flash memory devices. A number of intriguing technologies which we share below are also related to brick and mortar retail environments, including one patent application discussing a method of providing entertainment content to retail workers to keep them more productive.





IBM Computing Patents: Smarter E-mail to Blocking Commercials

Posted: Wednesday, Oct 8, 2014 @ 4:12 pm | Written by Steve Brachmann | No Comments »

Several days ago we profiled recent IBM patent applications. For this follow-up article we’ve gone through scores of patents issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to find you the latest and greatest in recently patented computing innovations.

The corporation has a proud history in intellectual property development, as is evidenced by the more than 60,000 patent plaques displayed at IBM’s headquarters in Armonk, NY. IBM (NASDAQ: IBM) is also proactive in the its scrutiny of intellectual property protection, as is evidenced by its recent decision to petition the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to declare invalid a series of patents in telecommunications fields held by Intellectual Ventures Management.

Today’s column focuses solely on the inventions recently added to IBM’s patent portfolio; everything you see below represents a technology for which IBM has been issued a U.S. patent grant from late August and into September 2014. Telecommunications innovations are included among this, specifically systems for e-mail organization and telephone call filtering. We share a trio of patents protecting computer languages and networking technologies. Social networking analysis technologies and a couple of inventions related to accessibility programs for computer users with impairments are also featured. Television viewers may be intrigued as well to learn about the novel technique for blocking unwanted commercial content protected by another IBM patent that we explored today.

For more about IBM patents and patent applications please see Companies We Follow: IBM.





When You Believe: A High Tech Entrepreneur’s Story

Posted: Wednesday, Oct 8, 2014 @ 8:00 am | Written by Michelle Fisher | 5 comments

Michelle Fisher, founder/CEO of Blaze Mobil.

A famous song entitled When You Believe by Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston is about believing in yourself and not losing hope. When you are working on a new idea and blazing a new trail, your self-belief and your passion drive you forward, and inspire you and others around you.

Passion is required, but passion alone is not enough. True passion will make you get up early in the morning, stay up late at night, or work for free. However, in addition to pursuing the ideas that you are passionate about, it’s equally important to take steps to protect your ideas. In a recent post, Doesn’t #NFC Stand for National Football Conference?, I wrote about our early entry into mobile payments. In that article I shared that, “In addition to taking action, risks and being customer focused, we also invested heavily in IP.”

Investing in IP is especially valuable when you are early in a market. It’s a mixed blessing though. On the one hand, it gives one an opportunity to file patents with broad claims, which is great for those who recognize the value in that strategy. For example, one of our early investors and board members was Chuck Russell who was one of the first CEO’s of Visa and reminded me of John Wayne. He was a great guy – very smart, charismatic, and honest. When I gave him a presentation on my company, which included one slide on the patents that we had filed, he asked, “Young lady have you ever heard of VHS and BETA?” I replied of course. He then went on to tell me that while VHS won the video tape war, because BETA had a patent on the technology, they were able to close their office and set up a PO box to collect monthly royalty checks. Chuck explained that I could do the same if I wanted. Based on the fact that I had filed patens in mobile payments, he made a significant investment in my company and joined our Board Of Directors.





A Post-Alice Playbook: Practical Strategies for Responding to Alice-Based Rejections

Posted: Tuesday, Oct 7, 2014 @ 10:00 am | Written by Robert Plotkin | 25 comments

Editorial Note: This article is a companion article to Software Patents are Only as Dead as Schrödinger’s Cat, which was published on Monday, October 6, 2014.

________________________

Although the Supreme Court in Alice declined to provide an express definition of “abstract idea,” the opinion is packed with evidence that the Court intended for the term “abstract idea” to apply not to any “abstract idea” in the colloquial sense, but only more specifically to abstract ideas that are fundamental practices long prevalent in their fields. Furthermore, although the Court did not provide any direct guidance regarding how “long” a practice must be in use to be “fundamental” and “long prevalent,” the examples that it used have been in use for hundreds of years, if not longer. To put it into everyday language, the Supreme Court seems to think that an idea is only a patent ineligible abstract idea if it is really, really old and well-established.





A Patent Drafting Checklist

Posted: Tuesday, Oct 7, 2014 @ 8:00 am | Written by Joseph Root | 2 comments

Here are the chapter summaries for Rules of Patent Drafting: Guidelines from Federal Circuit Case Law. The summaries include 19 pop culture references, and the first ten persons to identify them by email (jroot@qualipat.com) will receive fabulous prizes. You’re on the honor system to work from memory, not Google! To read other installments in the series please see Joseph Root on Patent Claim Drafting.

1. Drafting for Breadth

By employing the Drafting Rules set out above, the drafter expressly sets out the inventor’s intent for claim construction. Previously, a court could look at a single-embodiment specification and decide that the inventor really intended that embodiment to encompass the entire invention. If instead, that specification includes an additional paragraph, setting out several alternatives and variations, as well as expressly stating that the embodiment does not in fact encompass the entire invention, then courts are presented with exactly what they say they are seeking: the inventor’s intent. In Disclosure World, one gets what one discloses. To achieve a desired claim construction, disclose it. Complaining about Federal Circuit decisions accomplishes nothing, and whining does no good. Indeed, there is no crying in patent law.