<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Seeks Patent on Gaze Detection Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/07/apple-seeks-patent-on-gaze-detection-capabilities/id=41217/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/07/apple-seeks-patent-on-gaze-detection-capabilities/id=41217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Brachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones and tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=41217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, we’re featuring a number of interesting new patents and published applications from the U.S. Patent &#038; Trademark Office that have been assigned to Apple. A few of the applications we’ve chosen to profile include more efficient systems of detecting user inputs. One application describes a system allowing devices to enter a low-power mode based on user gaze detection, conserving battery power. Another application would protect a system for better facial recognition during photo processing of image files.

Other documents assigned to Apple showcase the corporation’s focus on aiding user communication and providing a more user-intuitive device experience. One application featured here was filed to protect a system of analyzing a user’s media preferences for gaming environments, while another improves a user’s ability to share a pinned location on a map with others.

An patent awarded to Apple this week protects a richer system for accessibility software, allowing users to enhance their reading experience rather than rely on continuous audio playback.
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/05/apple-seeks-patent-on-ad-hoc-cash-dispensing-network/id=34688/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Seeks Patent on Ad-Hoc Cash Dispensing Network'>Apple Seeks Patent on Ad-Hoc Cash Dispensing Network</a><small>Some very intriguing upgrades to digital media collaboration systems and cash transaction networks are among the many pieces of intellectual property that Apple is hoping the USPTO will protect. Also included is an easy accessory port to improve iPad usage and a system for associating images with geographical locations for easier map indexing. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/08/design-patent-awarded-to-apple-for-a-flat-screen-monitor-display/id=36832/' rel='bookmark' title='Design Patent Awarded to Apple For a Flat-screen Monitor Display'>Design Patent Awarded to Apple For a Flat-screen Monitor Display</a><small>This week’s patents include a design patent awarded for a flat-screen monitor display, improvements to voicemail retrieval systems and digital image processing improvements that help retain image detail. Apple also has a very intriguing collaborative media playback patent that would allow multiple people to affect the music choices in a room directly from their electronic device....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;'>Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;</a><small>This past week was another very prolific one for Apple, as the California-based electronic device developer received 35 patents and had another 36 applications published by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Many patent applications were concerned with the ways computer users interact with their systems, and we see a number of upgrades to graphical user interfaces coming for device address books and online stores. Of the patents issued to Apple, one protects a webpage retrieval method that can help browsers save a lot of time while searching for information on the Internet....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/07/apple-seeks-patent-on-gaze-detection-capabilities/id=41217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will President Obama Come to Apple&#8217;s Rescue?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/05/will-president-obama-come-to-apples-rescue/id=41309/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/05/will-president-obama-come-to-apples-rescue/id=41309/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple v. Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cease and desist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusion orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international trade commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 337]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone patent wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones and tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=41309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the President disapproves of the ruling for policy reasons he has the authority to nullify the determination. The statute specifically explains that upon disapproval of the President an ITC determination "shall have no force or effect." The problem that President Obama faces is very real and offers no easy way out. He will no doubt be pushed to used his authority under Section 1337(j) to disapprove of the ITC determination in order to assist Apple and AT&#038;T, both important US companies. The trouble is that Apple is a non-practicing entity and could (and probably should) be properly characterized as a patent troll. So will President Obama use his authority under Section 1337 to help a patent troll?<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/04/obama-on-patent-trolls-much-ado-about-nothing/id=41268/' rel='bookmark' title='Obama on Patent Trolls &#8211; Much Ado About Nothing'>Obama on Patent Trolls &#8211; Much Ado About Nothing</a><small>There is no doubt that the Obama position will be loved by Google and other Silicon Valley technology giants that despise the patent system. Given the revolving door between the Obama Administration and Google, the long-term close relationship between President Obama and Google (see here, here and here), and the fact that patent issues don't resonate with John Q. Public, it seems likely that the President stepping in now to allow him to tout that he is engaged with issues of importance in the minds of tech giants who will be asked for large checks later this week....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/04/white-house-task-force-on-high-tech-patent-issues/id=41251/' rel='bookmark' title='White House Task Force on High-Tech Patent Issues'>White House Task Force on High-Tech Patent Issues</a><small>Today the White House announced major steps to improve incentives for future innovation in high tech patents, a key driver of economic growth and good paying American jobs. The White House issued five executive actions and seven legislative recommendations designed to protect innovators from frivolous litigation and ensure the highest-quality patents in our system. Additionally, the National Economic Council and the Council of Economic Advisers released a report, Patent Assertion and U.S. Innovation, detailing the challenges posed and necessity for bold legislative action....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/07/apple-vs-samsung-the-smartphone-patent-war-continues/id=31072/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War Continues'>Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War Continues</a><small>Why is this fight so important? It could be a crucial decision for both companies, with the winner gaining leverage in the fast-paced and ever-growing billion dollar market. Each side wants to protect their stake, since they risk losing their high position on the mobile leaderboard as so many companies before them have done. Prime examples of companies that were once at the top of the game but are nowhere to be seen are BlackBerry and Nokia. Both of these were once the biggest names in mobile phones and handheld devices, but lost their edge once new technology started coming...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/05/will-president-obama-come-to-apples-rescue/id=41309/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Seeks Patents for E-Learning App Optimized for iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/03/apple-seeks-patents-for-e-learning-app-optimized-for-ipad/id=39862/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/03/apple-seeks-patents-for-e-learning-app-optimized-for-ipad/id=39862/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Brachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Issued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Brachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=39862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month, the USPTO has published many Apple patent applications that are specifically for improvements to the technology developer’s mobile devices. These include a more secure system of connecting an iPhone to a computer and two new applications, one for easily creating social groups among acquaintances and another for students who wish to enroll in online courses. Apple also wants to protect a system of pre-processing images to create and store thumbnails that are accessed by image applications.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;'>Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;</a><small>This past week was another very prolific one for Apple, as the California-based electronic device developer received 35 patents and had another 36 applications published by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Many patent applications were concerned with the ways computer users interact with their systems, and we see a number of upgrades to graphical user interfaces coming for device address books and online stores. Of the patents issued to Apple, one protects a webpage retrieval method that can help browsers save a lot of time while searching for information on the Internet....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/02/apple-awarded-a-patent-to-removing-blemishes-while-maintaining-image-quality/id=36217/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Awarded a Patent to Removing Blemishes While Maintaining Image Quality'>Apple Awarded a Patent to Removing Blemishes While Maintaining Image Quality</a><small>This week Apple had a total of 34 patents issued, including four design patents and a number of patents focusing on improvements to user interfaces on various Apple devices, such as a design patent on an icon (see bottom). Other patents obtained by Apple protect a new method of removing blemishes while still maintaining image quality and an illuminable laptop latch....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/16/apple-patent-application-improves-mandarin-chinese-translation/id=35556/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Patent Application Improves Mandarin Chinese Translation'>Apple Patent Application Improves Mandarin Chinese Translation</a><small>The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office only released 16 published patent applications from Apple this week, which is a fair amount less than usual. Many of the applications listed here focus on improvements to media processing and storage, an area of computer systems which has long been a focus for Apple. Other patent applications include improvements to Mandarin Chinese language translations and methods of grading display screens for light leakage....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/03/apple-seeks-patents-for-e-learning-app-optimized-for-ipad/id=39862/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Patent Litigation Really a Problem for Big Tech?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/01/is-patent-litigation-really-a-problem-for-big-tech/id=39325/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/01/is-patent-litigation-really-a-problem-for-big-tech/id=39325/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent troll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=39325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If big tech companies are selling unwanted patents to patent trolls who then turn around and monetize them there are a lot of questions to ask. First, why are they selling to those who then turn around and sue them? There is an obvious solution to this problem, if it is indeed a real problem and not one made up for sake of publicity and swaying public opinion (and political opinion on Capitol Hill). Second, what are they doing selling patents that can be monetized? If they are giving these patents away how is that appropriate at all when the company needs to answer to shareholders? Isn't the goal of any company to maximize returns for shareholders? Finally, if operating companies are selling to patent trolls then how is it possible that patent litigation is as big a problem as it is claimed to be? Something just doesn't smell right here, but a room full of symposium attendees were told that big tech companies sells out to patent trolls. Curious.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/02/google-we-dont-sell-to-patent-trolls/id=39927/' rel='bookmark' title='Google: We Don’t Sell to Patent Trolls'>Google: We Don’t Sell to Patent Trolls</a><small>Late yesterday I was contacted via telephone by a representative of Google about my article titled Is Patent Litigation Really a Problem for Big Tech? I was told during that telephone conversation that I misunderstood what Suzanne Michel said during the symposium at American University. I was also told that Google does not sell patents to patent trolls, although other big tech companies do, which concerns Google. Google has asked for a retraction. I am not entirely comfortable with a retraction because I think my interpretation of what Michel said was fair, although I’m willing to accept Google at face...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/08/29/paul-allen-sues-aol-google-facebook/id=12326/' rel='bookmark' title='Microsoft Co-Founder Paul Allen Sues Apple, Google, Facebook, Yahoo and Others for Patent Infringement'>Microsoft Co-Founder Paul Allen Sues Apple, Google, Facebook, Yahoo and Others for Patent Infringement</a><small>On Friday, August 27, 2010, Interval Research Corporation brought a patent infringement lawsuit against a who&#8217;s who of tech companies in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle, specifically suing AOL, Inc., Apple, Inc., eBay, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google Inc., Netflix, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc., Staples, Inc., [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/18/definition-patent-troll/id=11700/' rel='bookmark' title='In Search Of a Definition for the term &#8220;Patent Troll&#8221;'>In Search Of a Definition for the term &#8220;Patent Troll&#8221;</a><small>The reality is that the term patent troll seems to be more in the eye of the beholder than anything else. So a patent troll is whoever is suing you because you must be correct and some evil wrong-doer is holding you hostage. Never mind that you are actually infringing and you are the real wrong-doer (i.e., tortfeasor). What is needed is a working definition for the term patent troll so that this nonsense can stop once and for all, and so the uninformed in the media can be spared the embarrassment of their own cluelessness. So lets take a...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/01/is-patent-litigation-really-a-problem-for-big-tech/id=39325/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s Great Leap Forward in Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/04/chinas-great-leap-forward-in-patents/id=38625/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/04/chinas-great-leap-forward-in-patents/id=38625/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Neumeyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Neumeyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sipo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=38625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 28, Apple Inc. appeared in court in Shanghai to defend charges that Siri, its voice-recognition, personal-assistant software, allegedly infringes a Chinese patent. The plaintiff and owner of the patent, Zhizhen Internet Technology Co., claims its version of the software has over 100 million users in China and is requesting the court to ban all manufacturing or sales of Apple’s product in China. This was not the first time Apple faced patent infringement claims in China.  Last summer a Taiwanese man sued the company in China for alleged infringement relating to its Facetime technology.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/11/06/key-considerations-for-patent-strategies-in-china/id=20241/' rel='bookmark' title='Key Considerations for Patent Strategies in China'>Key Considerations for Patent Strategies in China</a><small>As the second largest economy in the world, China is emerging to the center of the world's economic stage. This emergence has been accompanied by constant changes in its legal and economic sectors. The intellectual property sector also has witnessed numerous recent changes. There have been significant new advances in China's national innovation policies. New trends in Chinese patent filings have emerged. A growing number of Chinese companies are creating their own IP and increasingly filing infringement suits against foreign companies and their local competitors in China. China's third patent law amendment has materially changed patent practice and procedures in...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/15/intellectual-property-protection-in-china-is-not-an-oxymoron/id=15769/' rel='bookmark' title='Intellectual Property Protection in China is NOT an Oxymoron'>Intellectual Property Protection in China is NOT an Oxymoron</a><small>Believe it or not, Patents are enforceable in China. Trademarks are enforceable in China. Copyrights are enforceable in China. The devil is in the details. Certainly if you are trying to enforce your patent against a company in the boondocks far west of Chengdu, and that company happens to be the largest employer in the district, then you are going to have problems. No one can / should tell you differently. However, can you tell me with a straight face that these same problems would not occur in the US if the situation was reversed - where a foreigner is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/02/world-intellectual-property-indicators-2012-design-patent-highlights/id=36290/' rel='bookmark' title='World Intellectual Property Indicators 2012: Design Patent Highlights'>World Intellectual Property Indicators 2012: Design Patent Highlights</a><small>The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) publishes a yearly report of the worldwide intellectual property filings. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2012 estimates draw from approximately 133 Patent offices, and include direct national and regional applications and those received through the Hague system of international registration. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/04/chinas-great-leap-forward-in-patents/id=38625/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Patents Promote Innovation? The Market is the Final Arbiter</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/04/do-patents-promote-innovation-the-market-is-the-final-arbiter/id=38642/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/04/do-patents-promote-innovation-the-market-is-the-final-arbiter/id=38642/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Ehrlich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-patent Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foster innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Ehrlich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone patent wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=38642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my opinion the best way to judge the success or failure of the patent system is by looking broadly at the type of competition it enables or disables in the marketplace.  And that doesn't mean focusing solely on patent litigation statistics - of course there are going to be fights when such a high stakes prize as mobile computing is up for grabs and of course firms competing with such different business models are going to come into conflict.  But look at what that competition has done for innovation and product advances and for consumer choice and pricing.  You need the option of patent protection to provide the necessary freedom of choice in market approach, (whether it is open, proprietary or a blend of both), to enable competition between firms employing different market approaches  and the innovation engendered by that competition..  The correct focus for this issue is not the intrinsic merit of the concept of patent protection, but rather what the existence of patents does to promote business model diversity and what that in turn does to promote innovation.  This is the important point and at least in my view it seems clear that having patents enables more business model diversity and consequently more innovation than not having them.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/apple-seeks-patent-for-parental-controls-on-pre-paid-debit-cards/id=33529/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Seeks Patent for Parental Controls on Pre-Paid Debit Cards'>Apple Seeks Patent for Parental Controls on Pre-Paid Debit Cards</a><small>Apple Inc. is always applying for protections on different device designs and computer systems. As happens every once in a while, three of these 18 published patents are part of a single series; these patents pertain to linking user accounts for mobile app software to obtain upgrades. Other patent applications seek protections on applications that provide parental oversight of a child’s pre-paid debit account or aid zoom functions on picture viewing applications. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/07/apple-vs-samsung-the-smartphone-patent-war-continues/id=31072/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War Continues'>Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War Continues</a><small>Why is this fight so important? It could be a crucial decision for both companies, with the winner gaining leverage in the fast-paced and ever-growing billion dollar market. Each side wants to protect their stake, since they risk losing their high position on the mobile leaderboard as so many companies before them have done. Prime examples of companies that were once at the top of the game but are nowhere to be seen are BlackBerry and Nokia. Both of these were once the biggest names in mobile phones and handheld devices, but lost their edge once new technology started coming...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/27/the-smart-phone-patent-wars-what-the-frand-is-going-on/id=23635/' rel='bookmark' title='The Smart Phone Patent Wars: What the FRAND is Going On?'>The Smart Phone Patent Wars: What the FRAND is Going On?</a><small>This all came to a head when, on February 22, 2012, Microsoft Corporation filed a formal competition law complaint against Google with European Union antitrust regulators. Microsoft’s complaint was brought about because Google (i.e., Motorola Mobility) “has refused to make its patents available at anything remotely close to a reasonable price” and “attempting to block sales of Windows PCs, our Xbox game console and other products.” Well isn’t Google’s “maximum per-unit royalty of 2.25% of the net selling price for the relevant end product” in compliance with FRAND!? If you consider that often dozens (and sometimes, hundreds) of patents cover...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/04/do-patents-promote-innovation-the-market-is-the-final-arbiter/id=38642/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Brachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntellectualProperty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=38453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past week was another very prolific one for Apple, as the California-based electronic device developer received 35 patents and had another 36 applications published by the U.S. Patent &#038; Trademark Office. Many patent applications were concerned with the ways computer users interact with their systems, and we see a number of upgrades to graphical user interfaces coming for device address books and online stores. Of the patents issued to Apple, one protects a webpage retrieval method that can help browsers save a lot of time while searching for information on the Internet.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/03/apple-seeks-patents-for-e-learning-app-optimized-for-ipad/id=39862/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Seeks Patents for E-Learning App Optimized for iPad'>Apple Seeks Patents for E-Learning App Optimized for iPad</a><small>This month, the USPTO has published many Apple patent applications that are specifically for improvements to the technology developer’s mobile devices. These include a more secure system of connecting an iPhone to a computer and two new applications, one for easily creating social groups among acquaintances and another for students who wish to enroll in online courses. Apple also wants to protect a system of pre-processing images to create and store thumbnails that are accessed by image applications....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/08/design-patent-awarded-to-apple-for-a-flat-screen-monitor-display/id=36832/' rel='bookmark' title='Design Patent Awarded to Apple For a Flat-screen Monitor Display'>Design Patent Awarded to Apple For a Flat-screen Monitor Display</a><small>This week’s patents include a design patent awarded for a flat-screen monitor display, improvements to voicemail retrieval systems and digital image processing improvements that help retain image detail. Apple also has a very intriguing collaborative media playback patent that would allow multiple people to affect the music choices in a room directly from their electronic device....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/08/apple-receives-patent-on-ipod-shuffle-ipad-scroll-bars/id=34986/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Receives Patent on iPod Shuffle, iPad Scroll bars'>Apple Receives Patent on iPod Shuffle, iPad Scroll bars</a><small>This patent protects Apple’s 4th-generation iPod Shuffle, originally introduced by the electronics device manufacturer back in September 2010. The application for this patent was originally filed as of late August 2010. The patent’s background section describes many of the difficulties faced by Apple in the development of their line of iPod Shuffles. The Shuffle is designed to be an electronic device contained within a very small housing while fitting in the proper media player components. Even without a display screen, these components can become fairly cumbersome within a small device. The Shuffle has a click wheel that users may use...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Awarded Processing Simulcast Data Patent</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/25/apple-awarded-processing-simulcast-data-patent/id=37909/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/25/apple-awarded-processing-simulcast-data-patent/id=37909/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Brachmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=37909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet again, it was another busy week for Apple Inc. at the U.S. Patent &#038; Trademark Office, as the California-based electronics developer received 48 patents and another 20 published applications for prospective patents.
A number of these applications describe upgrades to supporting components on Apple devices, including a new configuration for a device vibrator and a better system of illuminating keyboard keys. One of the more intriguing Apple patents awarded this week protects a system of displaying metadata to users extracted from radio broadcasts.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/21/apple-awarded-motion-detection-sensing-systems-patent/id=35815/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Awarded Motion Detection Sensing Systems Patent'>Apple Awarded Motion Detection Sensing Systems Patent</a><small>Apple received 37 patents in the third week of February from the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. These awarded patents include three design patents and a few motion detection sensing systems that allow individuals to interact with devices without having to touch the device. Other patents protect improvements to shock sensors within electronic devices and electronic contacts within jacks....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/05/apple-seeks-patent-on-ad-hoc-cash-dispensing-network/id=34688/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Seeks Patent on Ad-Hoc Cash Dispensing Network'>Apple Seeks Patent on Ad-Hoc Cash Dispensing Network</a><small>Some very intriguing upgrades to digital media collaboration systems and cash transaction networks are among the many pieces of intellectual property that Apple is hoping the USPTO will protect. Also included is an easy accessory port to improve iPad usage and a system for associating images with geographical locations for easier map indexing. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;'>Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;</a><small>This past week was another very prolific one for Apple, as the California-based electronic device developer received 35 patents and had another 36 applications published by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Many patent applications were concerned with the ways computer users interact with their systems, and we see a number of upgrades to graphical user interfaces coming for device address books and online stores. Of the patents issued to Apple, one protects a webpage retrieval method that can help browsers save a lot of time while searching for information on the Internet....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/25/apple-awarded-processing-simulcast-data-patent/id=37909/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Protects Fiber Optic Cable Connection that Self-Cleans</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/18/apple-protects-fiber-optic-cable-connection-that-self-cleans/id=37573/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/18/apple-protects-fiber-optic-cable-connection-that-self-cleans/id=37573/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Issued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Brachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=37573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Electronic device developer and manufacturer Apple Inc. has recorded another big week with the U.S. Patent &#038; Trademark Office. On Tuesday, the California corporation was issued 36 patents, and the USPTO published another 32 patent applications on Thursday. Many of these prospective patents focus on better responses to user interactions, including new methods of music library visualizations and smarter microphone response to ambient sound. One of the patents issued to Apple protects a fiber optic cable connection that is self-cleaning.
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/apple-seeks-patent-for-parental-controls-on-pre-paid-debit-cards/id=33529/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Seeks Patent for Parental Controls on Pre-Paid Debit Cards'>Apple Seeks Patent for Parental Controls on Pre-Paid Debit Cards</a><small>Apple Inc. is always applying for protections on different device designs and computer systems. As happens every once in a while, three of these 18 published patents are part of a single series; these patents pertain to linking user accounts for mobile app software to obtain upgrades. Other patent applications seek protections on applications that provide parental oversight of a child’s pre-paid debit account or aid zoom functions on picture viewing applications. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/16/apple-patent-application-improves-mandarin-chinese-translation/id=35556/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Patent Application Improves Mandarin Chinese Translation'>Apple Patent Application Improves Mandarin Chinese Translation</a><small>The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office only released 16 published patent applications from Apple this week, which is a fair amount less than usual. Many of the applications listed here focus on improvements to media processing and storage, an area of computer systems which has long been a focus for Apple. Other patent applications include improvements to Mandarin Chinese language translations and methods of grading display screens for light leakage....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/08/apple-receives-patent-on-ipod-shuffle-ipad-scroll-bars/id=34986/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Receives Patent on iPod Shuffle, iPad Scroll bars'>Apple Receives Patent on iPod Shuffle, iPad Scroll bars</a><small>This patent protects Apple’s 4th-generation iPod Shuffle, originally introduced by the electronics device manufacturer back in September 2010. The application for this patent was originally filed as of late August 2010. The patent’s background section describes many of the difficulties faced by Apple in the development of their line of iPod Shuffles. The Shuffle is designed to be an electronic device contained within a very small housing while fitting in the proper media player components. Even without a display screen, these components can become fairly cumbersome within a small device. The Shuffle has a click wheel that users may use...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/18/apple-protects-fiber-optic-cable-connection-that-self-cleans/id=37573/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple vs. Samsung: Decision Costs Apple $450 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/15/apple-vs-samsung/id=37043/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/15/apple-vs-samsung/id=37043/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[additur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-judgment interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=37043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday March 1, 2013 Judge Lucy Koh handed down her decision regarding various motions that were filed on behalf of Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Samsung Electronics Co. (“Samsung”) over the past few months post-trial. Specifically, Apple requested additur, supplemental damages, and prejudgment interest, while Samsung moved for a new trial on damages or remittitur.  Judge Koh determined that the “Court has identified an impermissible legal theory on which the jury based its award, and cannot reasonably calculate the amount of excess while effectuating the intent of the jury.” The total amount stricken from the jury’s award was $450,514,650 –pending a new trial on damages. The jury awards stands for the remaining 14 products for a total of $598,908,892 in favor of Apple.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/09/10/apple-v-samsung-jury-verdict-lacks-sufficient-detail-to-support-enhanced-damages/id=27921/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple v. Samsung: Jury Verdict Lacks Sufficient Detail To Support Enhanced Damages'>Apple v. Samsung: Jury Verdict Lacks Sufficient Detail To Support Enhanced Damages</a><small>The relative paucity of design patent jurisprudence regarding the legal remedy of damages and the equitable remedy of an accounting for the infringer’s profits, makes clear that while an award of damages for patent infringement may be enhanced under 35 U.S.C. § 284 for willful infringement, and award of profits under 35 U.S.C. § 289, may not be enhanced under Section 284. While this distinction may appear important to one who wishes to obtain an enhancement of the damages award for willful infringement, the jury verdict form in Apple v. Samsung leaves one clueless as to whether the monetary award...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/07/apple-vs-samsung-the-smartphone-patent-war-continues/id=31072/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War Continues'>Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War Continues</a><small>Why is this fight so important? It could be a crucial decision for both companies, with the winner gaining leverage in the fast-paced and ever-growing billion dollar market. Each side wants to protect their stake, since they risk losing their high position on the mobile leaderboard as so many companies before them have done. Prime examples of companies that were once at the top of the game but are nowhere to be seen are BlackBerry and Nokia. Both of these were once the biggest names in mobile phones and handheld devices, but lost their edge once new technology started coming...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/28/the-beginning-of-the-end-for-the-smart-phone-patent-wars/id=30479/' rel='bookmark' title='The Beginning of the End for the Smart Phone Patent Wars?'>The Beginning of the End for the Smart Phone Patent Wars?</a><small>First, remember that Steve Jobs once referred to the smartphone patent wars as the patent equivalent of global thermonuclear war. But will this be more like the Cold War or the Apocalypse? The only patent war that I can recall that actually approximated a patent version of the Apocalypse was the battle between Polaroid and Kodak. That saw a $909 million verdict in 1990, and ultimately settled for $925 million about a year later, but required total aggregate attorneys fees in the neighborhood of $550 million. The war lasted 15 years and didn't achieve the $2.5 to $5 billion that...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/15/apple-vs-samsung/id=37043/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austin-Based MONKEYmedia Gets New User Interface Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/15/austin-based-monkeymedia-gets-new-user-interface-patents/id=37182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/15/austin-based-monkeymedia-gets-new-user-interface-patents/id=37182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne Kendrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrienne Kendrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MonkeyMedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Issued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=37182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Patent and Trademark Office recently awarded over 200 new claims to user interface designer Eric Gould Bear, co-founder of MONKEYmedia.  The two most recently issued patents that have 72 claims between them fall under MONKEYmedia's "Relativity Controller" family of patents, and the Patent Office has stated that an additional 153 claims spread across three pending patent applications in the same family will issue soon. MONKEYmedia is currently suing both Apple and various Hollywood Studios for patent infringement.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/03/apple-seeks-patents-for-e-learning-app-optimized-for-ipad/id=39862/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Seeks Patents for E-Learning App Optimized for iPad'>Apple Seeks Patents for E-Learning App Optimized for iPad</a><small>This month, the USPTO has published many Apple patent applications that are specifically for improvements to the technology developer’s mobile devices. These include a more secure system of connecting an iPhone to a computer and two new applications, one for easily creating social groups among acquaintances and another for students who wish to enroll in online courses. Apple also wants to protect a system of pre-processing images to create and store thumbnails that are accessed by image applications....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;'>Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;</a><small>This past week was another very prolific one for Apple, as the California-based electronic device developer received 35 patents and had another 36 applications published by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Many patent applications were concerned with the ways computer users interact with their systems, and we see a number of upgrades to graphical user interfaces coming for device address books and online stores. Of the patents issued to Apple, one protects a webpage retrieval method that can help browsers save a lot of time while searching for information on the Internet....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/06/11/microsoft-to-patent-a-new-kind-of-dvr/id=41438/' rel='bookmark' title='Microsoft to Patent a New Kind of DVR'>Microsoft to Patent a New Kind of DVR</a><small>As a constant developer of new technologies, Microsoft is seen often as an assignee on a great many U.S. Patent & Trademark Office patents and applications every week. This week on Companies We Follow, IPWatchdog is taking a look at this corporation’s more intriguing patents as of late, including many of those that will affect consumer media use. A few of the patent applications profiled here detail specific improvements to consumer entertainment, especially where movies are concerned. One application would protect a system of rendering video elements as separate from browser elements for easier user customization. Another application describes a...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/15/austin-based-monkeymedia-gets-new-user-interface-patents/id=37182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Patent Apps Include 3 For Digital Rights Management</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/11/apple-patent-apps-digital-rights-management/id=37058/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/11/apple-patent-apps-digital-rights-management/id=37058/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies We Follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Brachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital rights management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=37058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The system laid out in these three interrelated patent applications would create an entire secondhand market for digital content like eBooks, music files and other software by managing access rights for a single file across multiple users. For example, a user could choose to sell the digital access rights to a music file to another user. When the transaction takes place, the server hosting the file receives a notice that access has shifted from one user to another. The patent’s methods also mention facilitating a money transaction with the access transfer. This system would also help users who want to access their DRM content on a different device; often, an individual cannot access their content between different computers, even if they have access rights.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/16/samsung-awarded-system-of-location-tracking-designed-for-parents/id=39109/' rel='bookmark' title='Samsung Awarded System of Location Tracking Designed for Parents'>Samsung Awarded System of Location Tracking Designed for Parents</a><small>Patent applications published recently by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office show Samsung’s goals of developing stronger systems of software protection and user interfaces for gesture-based gaming systems. Another patent application assigned to Samsung Electronics could protect an important advance in cancer treatments. One of the recent patents awarded to Samsung from the USPTO protects a more efficient system of location tracking designed for parents....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/02/apple-patent-replace-back-with-page-snapback/id=38453/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;'>Apple Patent to Replace the &#8220;Back&#8221; Button with &#8220;Page Snapback&#8221;</a><small>This past week was another very prolific one for Apple, as the California-based electronic device developer received 35 patents and had another 36 applications published by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Many patent applications were concerned with the ways computer users interact with their systems, and we see a number of upgrades to graphical user interfaces coming for device address books and online stores. Of the patents issued to Apple, one protects a webpage retrieval method that can help browsers save a lot of time while searching for information on the Internet....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/25/apple-plans-improvement-to-video-playback-quality/id=35931/' rel='bookmark' title='Apple Plans Improvement to Video Playback Quality'>Apple Plans Improvement to Video Playback Quality</a><small>USPTO published 23 patent applications filed by California electronics development and manufacturing leader Apple Inc. Efficiency seems to be a buzz word this week, as many of the patent applications seek protections for methods of either more efficient component manufacturing or different computer-based methods of using system resources effectively, including IP address allocation. Also, one notable digital media patent application shows how Apple plans to improve video playback quality by reducing the bumps and jostles of handheld recording....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/11/apple-patent-apps-digital-rights-management/id=37058/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
