<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; counterfeiting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/counterfeiting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Seventh Global Congress on Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Opens in Istanbul</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/24/global-congress-counterfeiting-piracy/id=39622/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/24/global-congress-counterfeiting-piracy/id=39622/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WIPO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international trademark system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world intellectual property organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=39622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 850 delegates from more than 100 countries are attending the three-day meeting from 24 to 26 April that is being chaired by the World Customs Organization (WCO) and hosted by Turkish Customs with the support of the Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey. United around a common goal to stop the trade in counterfeit and pirated products, the organizers and participants aim to share experiences and devise strategies to counteract this global phenomenon and the harm these goods can have on consumer health and safety, as well as intellectual property rights (IPR).<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/28/protecting-your-intellectual-property-in-china/id=16030/' rel='bookmark' title='Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China'>Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China</a><small>The China Road Show is a series of two-day China IP events that the USPTO is hosting across the country to help educate businesses about the realities of piracy and counterfeiting—which cost the American economy approximately $250 billion annually. Day 1 is largely devoted to understanding the patent, trademark and copyright laws in China, as well as enforcement of those rights. Day 2 of the seminar will address § 337 Infringement Investigations by the International Trade Commission (ITC), the challenges presented by counterfeiting and piracy on the Internet and the development of global IP strategies even for small businesses....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/22/combating-copyright-infringement-dmca-take-down-notices/id=14470/' rel='bookmark' title='Combating Copyright Infringement: DMCA Take Down Notices'>Combating Copyright Infringement: DMCA Take Down Notices</a><small>We shouldn't fool ourselves and try and pretend that the lack of respect for intellectual property rights is limited to those who seek to share movies, music or make a buck selling knock-off products. Everyone who produces original content on the Internet is at risk of having that content stolen; simply cut and pasted onto some other website or blog. Even if it is not passed off as original content and you do get "credit" the copyist is using your work for their own benefit. They are stealing eyeballs, diverting traffic and likely costing you money. At the very least,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/08/one-grave-problem-counterfeiting-piracy-ip-theft/id=16838/' rel='bookmark' title='One Grave Problem: Counterfeiting, Piracy and IP Theft'>One Grave Problem: Counterfeiting, Piracy and IP Theft</a><small>Criminals are finding that the penalties for intellectual property crimes pale in comparison to the penalties they would receive for trafficking drugs and engaging in other illicit activities. At the same time, the profit margin for counterfeit software is extremely high. So the combination of great riches, relatively low penalties and a low likelihood of being caught and you can see why criminal enterprises, including terrorist networks, are becoming major players in the counterfeit software black-market. In fact, one of the most vicious drug cartels in the world makes an estimated $2.4 million per day selling counterfeit software. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/24/global-congress-counterfeiting-piracy/id=39622/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Costco Attempts to Defend Sale of Counterfeit TIFFANY Diamonds</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/01/costco-attempts-to-defend-sale-of-counterfeit-tiffany-diamonds/id=38395/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/01/costco-attempts-to-defend-sale-of-counterfeit-tiffany-diamonds/id=38395/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco wholesale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incontestable status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiffany Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=38395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This should have been an open and shut case. But then Costco decided to aggressively defend what seems indefensible. Costco is basing its defense on the belief that the "[t]he word Tiffany is a generic term for ring settings comprising multiple slender prongs extending upward from a base to hold a single gemstone." See opening paragraph of the Costco Answer and Counterclaim. In support of this position Costco submitted dictionary definitions, pages from Wedding Planning for Dummies discussing rings, online articles (such as from About.com), online sales pages (such as from Amazon.com) and other materials.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/15/tiffany-sues-costco-over-counterfeit-diamond-rings/id=35576/' rel='bookmark' title='Tiffany Sues Costco Over Counterfeit Diamond Rings'>Tiffany Sues Costco Over Counterfeit Diamond Rings</a><small>The dispute between Tiffany and Costco first came to light in November 2012 when a customer alerted Tiffany to the sale of what was promoted on in-store signs as “Tiffany” diamond engagement rings at a Costco store in Huntington Beach, California. Tiffany immediately launched an investigation, and later learned that for many years, and without Tiffany’s knowledge, Costco had apparently been selling different styles of rings that it has falsely identified on in-store signage as “Tiffany.” The rings are not in fact Tiffany rings, nor are they manufactured by, approved by, licensed by, or otherwise in any way properly associated...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/02/04/trademarking-a-domain-name-sure-why-not/id=14983/' rel='bookmark' title='Trademarking a Domain Name?  Sure, why not?'>Trademarking a Domain Name?  Sure, why not?</a><small>A common misconception is that a website that just advertises your goods or services can be a trademark. It can’t. The domain has to be a unique source indicator all on its own, meaning it has to tell people what your goods or services are on its own. Basically, if your domain name is just an Internet address where your customers can find you, it can’t be registered. It just tells people where to find you. It is merely incidental to your primary business purpose....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/16/trademark-cases-of-the-united-states-supreme-court/id=28896/' rel='bookmark' title='Trademark Cases of the United States Supreme Court'>Trademark Cases of the United States Supreme Court</a><small>In 1879 the United States Supreme Court first had the opportunity (and necessity) to address whether Congress had been granted in the Constitution the power to enact legislation to protect trademarks. Since 1879 there have been many cases involved trademark issues that have wound up the top Court in the United States. But a summary start to finish of all Supreme Court trademark cases is even a bit ambitious for us in a single article. Thus, what follows is a summary of those trademarks issues that have reached the Supreme Court over the last generation. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/01/costco-attempts-to-defend-sale-of-counterfeit-tiffany-diamonds/id=38395/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiffany Sues Costco Over Counterfeit Diamond Rings</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/15/tiffany-sues-costco-over-counterfeit-diamond-rings/id=35576/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/15/tiffany-sues-costco-over-counterfeit-diamond-rings/id=35576/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco wholesale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickstein Shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=35576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dispute between Tiffany and Costco first came to light in November 2012 when a customer alerted Tiffany to the sale of what was promoted on in-store signs as “Tiffany” diamond engagement rings at a Costco store in Huntington Beach, California. Tiffany immediately launched an investigation, and later learned that for many years, and without Tiffany’s knowledge, Costco had apparently been selling different styles of rings that it has falsely identified on in-store signage as “Tiffany.” The rings are not in fact Tiffany rings, nor are they manufactured by, approved by, licensed by, or otherwise in any way properly associated with Tiffany.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/01/costco-attempts-to-defend-sale-of-counterfeit-tiffany-diamonds/id=38395/' rel='bookmark' title='Costco Attempts to Defend Sale of Counterfeit TIFFANY Diamonds'>Costco Attempts to Defend Sale of Counterfeit TIFFANY Diamonds</a><small>This should have been an open and shut case. But then Costco decided to aggressively defend what seems indefensible. Costco is basing its defense on the belief that the "[t]he word Tiffany is a generic term for ring settings comprising multiple slender prongs extending upward from a base to hold a single gemstone." See opening paragraph of the Costco Answer and Counterclaim. In support of this position Costco submitted dictionary definitions, pages from Wedding Planning for Dummies discussing rings, online articles (such as from About.com), online sales pages (such as from Amazon.com) and other materials....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/17/under-armour-sues-body-armor-for-trademark-infringement/id=26509/' rel='bookmark' title='Under Armour Sues Body Armor for Trademark Infringement'>Under Armour Sues Body Armor for Trademark Infringement</a><small>Still, it seems a little reckless to me to select a trademark that incorporates "ARMOR" or "ARMOUR" when entering an industry that has a heavyweight such as Under Armour with a large trademark portfolio and the means to enforce that portfolio. Is the name BODYARMOR so critical to the success of the company and selling their drinks? I doubt it. So then why run the risk of incurring the wrath of a well funded and well known trademark owner? It just doesn't make business sense if you ask me. That is why I always advise companies to consider doing a...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/28/fat-freezing-body-sculpting-at-center-or-trademark-dispute/id=29343/' rel='bookmark' title='Fat Freezing Body Sculpting at Center of Trademark Dispute'>Fat Freezing Body Sculpting at Center of Trademark Dispute</a><small>The technology that involves cooling fact cells to reduce the amount of body fat is the center of a new trademark complaint. Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc has filed a claim against Dr. Marco Hallerbach, MD, and Dr. Hallerbach & Associates, Inc. claiming that they are not only unlawfully using a procedure they own, but that in so doing they are infringing various trademarks owned by the company. The complaint was filed in the United States Federal District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division on October 9, 2012. Zeltiq also filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction simultaneous with the...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/15/tiffany-sues-costco-over-counterfeit-diamond-rings/id=35576/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crocs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doing business in china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doing business with china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organized crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=31121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX) announced earlier today that Chinese courts have sentenced 18 individuals to a total of more than 46 years in prison for producing and selling counterfeit Crocs goods. Seventeen individuals were convicted of counterfeiting, and two of the 17 also were convicted of offering bribes. Another individual also was convicted on bribery charges in connection with production of counterfeit Crocs™ shoes. In addition to prison sentences, the above men together face fines totaling RMB 2,832,500 (approximately $450,896).<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/29/wine-spirits-industry-fight-chinese-counterfeiting/id=14760/' rel='bookmark' title='Wine &amp; Spirits Industry Fight Chinese Counterfeiting'>Wine &#038; Spirits Industry Fight Chinese Counterfeiting</a><small>It is unfortunate for businesses, but China is becoming practically synonymous with intellectual property theft, piracy and counterfeiting. On top of that, many technology companies are learning that doing licensing deals with the Chinese means they turn over the technologies and as soon as the Chinese corporation is capable of employing the technology the sever the relationship and then compete against American companies with American technology, they just don't have to recoup the research and development costs and they have a cheap labor force....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/11/combating-counterfeiting-and-unauthorized-product-sales/id=25361/' rel='bookmark' title='Combating Counterfeiting and Unauthorized Product Sales'>Combating Counterfeiting and Unauthorized Product Sales</a><small>Criminals on all levels — from opportunistic, small-time thieves to major drug cartels — are finding that the penalties for intellectual property crimes pale in comparison to the penalties they would receive for trafficking drugs and engaging in other illicit activities. At the same time, the profit margin for counterfeit software, as well as for other counterfeit goods, is extremely high. So the combination of great riches, relatively low penalties and a low likelihood of being caught and you can see why criminal enterprises, including terrorist networks, are becoming major players in the counterfeit software black-market....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/14/counterfeiting-a-growing-worldwide-problem/id=18428/' rel='bookmark' title='Counterfeiting, A Growing Worldwide Problem'>Counterfeiting, A Growing Worldwide Problem</a><small>Counterfeiting is a far bigger story than loses to big companies and the associated loss of downstream economic activity. Those that support counterfeiters by buying knock-off goods are also increasingly supporting organized crime, including drug cartels, who are increasingly looking to the generous profits that can be earned and exceptionally low jail terms even if they do get caught. In fact, the largest Italian organized crime group is estimated to receive 10% of its annual $25 billion from counterfeited and pirated goods....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case of the Counterfeit Cell Phone Case</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/03/the-case-of-the-counterfeit-cell-phone-case/id=30798/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/03/the-case-of-the-counterfeit-cell-phone-case/id=30798/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Corinne Kerston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corinne Kerston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speck Products has obtained a judgment from a California Federal Court against Tsai &#038; Shaw, a company that has been selling counterfeit Speck iPhone cases. The judgment includes a permanent injunction against Tsai &#038; Shaw, as well as an award for the damages. The case against Tsai &#038; Shaw is just one of the several judgments in the last year that equals over $1.2 million in damages against Tsai &#038; Shaw and other counterfeiters. <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/health-safety-risks-from-counterfeits-in-the-supply-chain/id=30096/' rel='bookmark' title='Health &amp; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain'>Health &#038; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain</a><small>The white paper outlines just how these counterfeit parts are entering the global supply chains. Even though there are government regulations and precautionary measures taken by the industry, there seems to be a growing problem with counterfeit parts that can cause damage and even fatalities. The introduction of the whitepaper claims: “The complex and distributed nature of supply chains has created vulnerabilities for companies and organizations. Governments and regulations can only go so far. As such, industry can benefit from taking a more proactive approach to protecting the supply chain from counterfeit products and pirated materials.”...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/' rel='bookmark' title='Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time'>Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time</a><small>Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX) announced earlier today that Chinese courts have sentenced 18 individuals to a total of more than 46 years in prison for producing and selling counterfeit Crocs goods. Seventeen individuals were convicted of counterfeiting, and two of the 17 also were convicted of offering bribes. Another individual also was convicted on bribery charges in connection with production of counterfeit Crocs™ shoes. In addition to prison sentences, the above men together face fines totaling RMB 2,832,500 (approximately $450,896)....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/13/counterfeit-coupons-a-costly-scam/id=26326/' rel='bookmark' title='Counterfeit Coupons &#8211; A Costly Scam'>Counterfeit Coupons &#8211; A Costly Scam</a><small>According to the FTC, coupons are a big business.  There are more than 3,000 manufacturers that annually distribute nearly 330 billion coupons that are worth an estimated $280 billion. With this type of marketplace it is easy to understand why opportunistic criminals would be interested in the industry, particularly given the economic plight of the moment caused by the Great Recession, which we cannot seem to escape.  Tough times cause people to be more cost conscious, but this also provides the perfect cover for con artists and scammers.  ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/03/the-case-of-the-counterfeit-cell-phone-case/id=30798/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health &amp; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/health-safety-risks-from-counterfeits-in-the-supply-chain/id=30096/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/health-safety-risks-from-counterfeits-in-the-supply-chain/id=30096/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Corinne Kerston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corinne Kerston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREATE.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The white paper outlines just how these counterfeit parts are entering the global supply chains. Even though there are government regulations and precautionary measures taken by the industry, there seems to be a growing problem with counterfeit parts that can cause damage and even fatalities. The introduction of the whitepaper claims: “The complex and distributed nature of supply chains has created vulnerabilities for companies and organizations. Governments and regulations can only go so far. As such, industry can benefit from taking a more proactive approach to protecting the supply chain from counterfeit products and pirated materials.”<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/03/the-case-of-the-counterfeit-cell-phone-case/id=30798/' rel='bookmark' title='The Case of the Counterfeit Cell Phone Case'>The Case of the Counterfeit Cell Phone Case</a><small>Speck Products has obtained a judgment from a California Federal Court against Tsai & Shaw, a company that has been selling counterfeit Speck iPhone cases. The judgment includes a permanent injunction against Tsai & Shaw, as well as an award for the damages. The case against Tsai & Shaw is just one of the several judgments in the last year that equals over $1.2 million in damages against Tsai & Shaw and other counterfeiters. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/31/fake-products-pose-real-dangers/id=26979/' rel='bookmark' title='“Fake” Products Pose Real Dangers'>“Fake” Products Pose Real Dangers</a><small>Counterfeiting is now one of the fastest growing and profitable industries in the world. With an average of 5 - 7% of the world trade market, it is a $600 billion per year industry. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reports the total number of counterfeit goods increased dramatically in FY 2011 by 24% compared to the prior year, and has increased 325% over the past decade. The impact and cost across industries is quite staggering. The Federal Trade Commission reported that counterfeit automotive parts total approximately $12 billion and also result in 200,000 fewer manufacturing jobs. Additionally, electronics...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/' rel='bookmark' title='Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time'>Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time</a><small>Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX) announced earlier today that Chinese courts have sentenced 18 individuals to a total of more than 46 years in prison for producing and selling counterfeit Crocs goods. Seventeen individuals were convicted of counterfeiting, and two of the 17 also were convicted of offering bribes. Another individual also was convicted on bribery charges in connection with production of counterfeit Crocs™ shoes. In addition to prison sentences, the above men together face fines totaling RMB 2,832,500 (approximately $450,896)....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/health-safety-risks-from-counterfeits-in-the-supply-chain/id=30096/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Fake” Products Pose Real Dangers</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/31/fake-products-pose-real-dangers/id=26979/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/31/fake-products-pose-real-dangers/id=26979/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=26979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Counterfeiting is now one of the fastest growing and profitable industries in the world. With an average of 5 - 7% of the world trade market, it is a $600 billion per year industry. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reports the total number of counterfeit goods increased dramatically in FY 2011 by 24% compared to the prior year, and has increased 325% over the past decade. The impact and cost across industries is quite staggering. The Federal Trade Commission reported that counterfeit automotive parts total approximately $12 billion and also result in 200,000 fewer manufacturing jobs. Additionally, electronics industry experts stated a loss of between $100 billion and $200 billion annually. Of particular concern is the pharmaceutical industry, which counterfeit drugs account for $75 billion dollars globally.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/health-safety-risks-from-counterfeits-in-the-supply-chain/id=30096/' rel='bookmark' title='Health &amp; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain'>Health &#038; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain</a><small>The white paper outlines just how these counterfeit parts are entering the global supply chains. Even though there are government regulations and precautionary measures taken by the industry, there seems to be a growing problem with counterfeit parts that can cause damage and even fatalities. The introduction of the whitepaper claims: “The complex and distributed nature of supply chains has created vulnerabilities for companies and organizations. Governments and regulations can only go so far. As such, industry can benefit from taking a more proactive approach to protecting the supply chain from counterfeit products and pirated materials.”...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/03/the-case-of-the-counterfeit-cell-phone-case/id=30798/' rel='bookmark' title='The Case of the Counterfeit Cell Phone Case'>The Case of the Counterfeit Cell Phone Case</a><small>Speck Products has obtained a judgment from a California Federal Court against Tsai & Shaw, a company that has been selling counterfeit Speck iPhone cases. The judgment includes a permanent injunction against Tsai & Shaw, as well as an award for the damages. The case against Tsai & Shaw is just one of the several judgments in the last year that equals over $1.2 million in damages against Tsai & Shaw and other counterfeiters. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/' rel='bookmark' title='Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time'>Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time</a><small>Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX) announced earlier today that Chinese courts have sentenced 18 individuals to a total of more than 46 years in prison for producing and selling counterfeit Crocs goods. Seventeen individuals were convicted of counterfeiting, and two of the 17 also were convicted of offering bribes. Another individual also was convicted on bribery charges in connection with production of counterfeit Crocs™ shoes. In addition to prison sentences, the above men together face fines totaling RMB 2,832,500 (approximately $450,896)....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/31/fake-products-pose-real-dangers/id=26979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counterfeit Coupons &#8211; A Costly Scam</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/13/counterfeit-coupons-a-costly-scam/id=26326/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/13/counterfeit-coupons-a-costly-scam/id=26326/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupon Information Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=26326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the FTC, coupons are a big business.  There are more than 3,000 manufacturers that annually distribute nearly 330 billion coupons that are worth an estimated $280 billion. With this type of marketplace it is easy to understand why opportunistic criminals would be interested in the industry, particularly given the economic plight of the moment caused by the Great Recession, which we cannot seem to escape.  Tough times cause people to be more cost conscious, but this also provides the perfect cover for con artists and scammers.  <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/health-safety-risks-from-counterfeits-in-the-supply-chain/id=30096/' rel='bookmark' title='Health &amp; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain'>Health &#038; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain</a><small>The white paper outlines just how these counterfeit parts are entering the global supply chains. Even though there are government regulations and precautionary measures taken by the industry, there seems to be a growing problem with counterfeit parts that can cause damage and even fatalities. The introduction of the whitepaper claims: “The complex and distributed nature of supply chains has created vulnerabilities for companies and organizations. Governments and regulations can only go so far. As such, industry can benefit from taking a more proactive approach to protecting the supply chain from counterfeit products and pirated materials.”...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/' rel='bookmark' title='Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time'>Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time</a><small>Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX) announced earlier today that Chinese courts have sentenced 18 individuals to a total of more than 46 years in prison for producing and selling counterfeit Crocs goods. Seventeen individuals were convicted of counterfeiting, and two of the 17 also were convicted of offering bribes. Another individual also was convicted on bribery charges in connection with production of counterfeit Crocs™ shoes. In addition to prison sentences, the above men together face fines totaling RMB 2,832,500 (approximately $450,896)....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/29/wine-spirits-industry-fight-chinese-counterfeiting/id=14760/' rel='bookmark' title='Wine &amp; Spirits Industry Fight Chinese Counterfeiting'>Wine &#038; Spirits Industry Fight Chinese Counterfeiting</a><small>It is unfortunate for businesses, but China is becoming practically synonymous with intellectual property theft, piracy and counterfeiting. On top of that, many technology companies are learning that doing licensing deals with the Chinese means they turn over the technologies and as soon as the Chinese corporation is capable of employing the technology the sever the relationship and then compete against American companies with American technology, they just don't have to recoup the research and development costs and they have a cheap labor force....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/13/counterfeit-coupons-a-costly-scam/id=26326/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Combating Counterfeiting and Unauthorized Product Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/11/combating-counterfeiting-and-unauthorized-product-sales/id=25361/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/11/combating-counterfeiting-and-unauthorized-product-sales/id=25361/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organized crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=25361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criminals on all levels — from opportunistic, small-time thieves to major drug cartels — are finding that the penalties for intellectual property crimes pale in comparison to the penalties they would receive for trafficking drugs and engaging in other illicit activities.  At the same time, the profit margin for counterfeit software, as well as for other counterfeit goods, is extremely high.  So the combination of great riches, relatively low penalties and a low likelihood of being caught and you can see why criminal enterprises, including terrorist networks, are becoming major players in the counterfeit software black-market.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/' rel='bookmark' title='Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time'>Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time</a><small>Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX) announced earlier today that Chinese courts have sentenced 18 individuals to a total of more than 46 years in prison for producing and selling counterfeit Crocs goods. Seventeen individuals were convicted of counterfeiting, and two of the 17 also were convicted of offering bribes. Another individual also was convicted on bribery charges in connection with production of counterfeit Crocs™ shoes. In addition to prison sentences, the above men together face fines totaling RMB 2,832,500 (approximately $450,896)....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/health-safety-risks-from-counterfeits-in-the-supply-chain/id=30096/' rel='bookmark' title='Health &amp; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain'>Health &#038; Safety Risks from Counterfeits in the Supply Chain</a><small>The white paper outlines just how these counterfeit parts are entering the global supply chains. Even though there are government regulations and precautionary measures taken by the industry, there seems to be a growing problem with counterfeit parts that can cause damage and even fatalities. The introduction of the whitepaper claims: “The complex and distributed nature of supply chains has created vulnerabilities for companies and organizations. Governments and regulations can only go so far. As such, industry can benefit from taking a more proactive approach to protecting the supply chain from counterfeit products and pirated materials.”...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/31/fake-products-pose-real-dangers/id=26979/' rel='bookmark' title='“Fake” Products Pose Real Dangers'>“Fake” Products Pose Real Dangers</a><small>Counterfeiting is now one of the fastest growing and profitable industries in the world. With an average of 5 - 7% of the world trade market, it is a $600 billion per year industry. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reports the total number of counterfeit goods increased dramatically in FY 2011 by 24% compared to the prior year, and has increased 325% over the past decade. The impact and cost across industries is quite staggering. The Federal Trade Commission reported that counterfeit automotive parts total approximately $12 billion and also result in 200,000 fewer manufacturing jobs. Additionally, electronics...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/11/combating-counterfeiting-and-unauthorized-product-sales/id=25361/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buyer Beware! Counterfeit Patent Bar Review Courses on eBay</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/08/buyer-beware-counterfeit-patent-bar-review-courses-on-ebay/id=24719/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/08/buyer-beware-counterfeit-patent-bar-review-courses-on-ebay/id=24719/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Bar Exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Bar Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practising Law Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent bar examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent registration exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=24719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The posting says that the purchaser will acquire a version of the course that was first purchased in March 2012 and includes 36 audio CDs, 8 video DVDs and Patware 9.0.  That is simply not possible because by March 2012 the courses being sold did not include any of this.  John White and I updated the course at the beginning of 2011 to take into account the then newly tested material, which included KSR rationales and guidelines, Bilski guidelines and the 112 guidelines.  At this time in the beginning of 2011 audio CDs and DVDs ceased to be provided, and Patware was no longer available in disk form. The last version of Patware on disk was indeed Patware 9.0, but that did not include any questions on KSR, Bilski or the 112 guidelines.  Simply stated, a course that included audio CDs, DVDs and Patware on disk had to have been purchased at the very beginning of 2011 or earlier.  The claims in this ad are simply false.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/the-latest-intelligence-on-the-updated-patent-bar-exam/id=29335/' rel='bookmark' title='The Latest Intelligence on the Updated Patent Bar Exam'>The Latest Intelligence on the Updated Patent Bar Exam</a><small>Generally, the Patent Exam remains as predictable as ever in terms of what the USPTO wants you to know. The USPTO concentrates on those issues that lead to loss of rights and prejudice to your client's situation. They want to be sure you know how to get a filing date, assert priority, respond to Office Actions, start and advance an appeal, etc. As to the post-grant procedures added by AIA Phase 2, the focus is on how they are started, timing, and thresholds of proof....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/01/patent-bar-exam-refresh-pto-now-testing-new-materials/id=28274/' rel='bookmark' title='Patent Bar Exam Refresh: PTO Now Testing New Materials'>Patent Bar Exam Refresh: PTO Now Testing New Materials</a><small>We also know from past history that when the Patent Office first starts to test new material they disproportionately weight it in the database of questions so you are likely to be heavily tested. We anticipate that the newly testable material will generate between 15 to 20 questions on the Patent Bar Exam starting immediately, or nearly immediately. This newly testable information comes on the heels of AIA phase 1 and KSR, Bilski and 112 Guidelines that all started to become tested in April 2011. We anticipate that the newly testable material that has come online since April 2011 will...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/12/06/pto-updates-patent-bar-exam/id=20829/' rel='bookmark' title='PTO Updates Patent Bar Exam to Test AIA &amp; Appeal Rules'>PTO Updates Patent Bar Exam to Test AIA &#038; Appeal Rules</a><small>Beginning January 31, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will update the content of the patent registration examination to cover two new rules issued September 26, 2011 that relate to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. These new rules permit prioritized examination of patent applications (Track I) and revise the standard for granting inter partes reexamination requests. Additionally, the patent registration examination will also include questions concerning the November 22, 2011 rules governing practice in ex parte appeals before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/08/buyer-beware-counterfeit-patent-bar-review-courses-on-ebay/id=24719/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPTO 2011 Trademark Expo, Fun for the Whole Family</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/23/uspto-2011-trademark-expo-fun-for-the-whole-family/id=19374/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/23/uspto-2011-trademark-expo-fun-for-the-whole-family/id=19374/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barbie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[characters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clifford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crayola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curious george]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruit of the Loom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEICO’s Gecko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamburger Helper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hershey's Milk Chocolate Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nascar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national trademark expo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olive Oyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent and trademark office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pillsbury’s Doughboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pink Panther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinocchio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popeye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark expo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states patent and trademark office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=19374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will host the 2011 National Trademark Expo on Friday, October 14th, and Saturday, October 15th, at the USPTO’s headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. The free two-day event is designed to educate the public about the value of trademarks in the global marketplace. If you have young children and are looking for something exceptionally fun, and free, I highly recommend the Trademark Expo. While there are seminars aimed at adults, which are quite good, children will have a blast because costumed characters will be walking about and mugging for photos with children, families and adults too!<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/10/17/kappos-welcomes-expo-to-us-trademark-and-patent-office/id=12808/' rel='bookmark' title='Kappos Welcomes Expo to US Trademark and Patent Office'>Kappos Welcomes Expo to US Trademark and Patent Office</a><small>On Friday, October 15, 2010 and again on Saturday, October 16, 2010, the United States Trademark and Patent Office (USTPO) played host to the National Trademark Expo. That is no typo or clerical error. Director Kappos, who was introduced by Lynne Beresford, the Commissioner for Trademarks, started the day with an address and began by [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/23/uspto-announces-2012-national-trademark-expo/id=22918/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO Announces 2012 National Trademark Expo'>USPTO Announces 2012 National Trademark Expo</a><small>The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will host the 2012 National Trademark Expo on Friday, Oct. 19, and Saturday, Oct. 20, at the USPTO’s headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. The free two-day event is designed to educate the public about trademarks and their importance in the global marketplace. Last year’s Trademark Expo attracted more than 15,000 visitors of all ages....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/28/protecting-your-intellectual-property-in-china/id=16030/' rel='bookmark' title='Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China'>Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China</a><small>The China Road Show is a series of two-day China IP events that the USPTO is hosting across the country to help educate businesses about the realities of piracy and counterfeiting—which cost the American economy approximately $250 billion annually. Day 1 is largely devoted to understanding the patent, trademark and copyright laws in China, as well as enforcement of those rights. Day 2 of the seminar will address § 337 Infringement Investigations by the International Trade Commission (ITC), the challenges presented by counterfeiting and piracy on the Internet and the development of global IP strategies even for small businesses....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/23/uspto-2011-trademark-expo-fun-for-the-whole-family/id=19374/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Copyright Theft: Content Creators Must Stay Vigilant</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/03/internet-copyright-theft-content-creators-must-stay-vigilant/id=18966/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/03/internet-copyright-theft-content-creators-must-stay-vigilant/id=18966/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fantasy football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=18966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changes were made in the copyright laws of the United States in order to ensure that what David LaMacchia did would be criminal in the future. Nevertheless, those changes to the copyright laws did not put an end to piracy on the Internet, nor could they have been realistically expected to do so. Corporations, entrepreneurs, artists and creators have lobbied the United States Congress for changes in the law to help them protect their copyrighted works, but they have also increasingly relied upon technological measures to protect their copyrighted works. While there is no legal requirement that a copyright holder take steps to secure or sequester material in order to avail themselves of the protection offered by U.S. copyright laws, there is no prohibition against copyright owners seeking to use technological means to preserve their rights. Prudence dictates content creators continually monitor to see if there is ongoing infringement, take steps to make such infringement more difficut and do whatever can be done to address infringement when (not if) it is discovered.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/22/combating-copyright-infringement-dmca-take-down-notices/id=14470/' rel='bookmark' title='Combating Copyright Infringement: DMCA Take Down Notices'>Combating Copyright Infringement: DMCA Take Down Notices</a><small>We shouldn't fool ourselves and try and pretend that the lack of respect for intellectual property rights is limited to those who seek to share movies, music or make a buck selling knock-off products. Everyone who produces original content on the Internet is at risk of having that content stolen; simply cut and pasted onto some other website or blog. Even if it is not passed off as original content and you do get "credit" the copyist is using your work for their own benefit. They are stealing eyeballs, diverting traffic and likely costing you money. At the very least,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/28/zoominfos-blatant-copyright-infringement/id=5374/' rel='bookmark' title='Zoominfo&#8217;s Blatant Copyright Infringement'>Zoominfo&#8217;s Blatant Copyright Infringement</a><small>Every once in a while we do an Internet search to find out what is out there quoting to IPWatchdog.com or me personally.  We also try and make sure that others are not infringing upon our works by republishing our content without permission.  It is flattering in one sense to have people want to steal [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/09/using-copyright-law-to-get-removed-from-jerk-com/id=22697/' rel='bookmark' title='Using U.S. Copyright Law to Get Removed from Jerk.com'>Using U.S. Copyright Law to Get Removed from Jerk.com</a><small>Jerk.com is one of those sites on the Internet that is the poster-child for everything wrong with the Internet and the anonymous communications that are so commonplace. The Internet is the refuge for cowards that wouldn't have the guts to approach someone and say what they really feel to their face. Shrouded in secrecy provided by the Internet anonymous cowards become emboldened to say vile things and stoop to ridiculous lows — even publishing pictures of young children and asking the Internet community to vote on whether the minor is a jerk....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/03/internet-copyright-theft-content-creators-must-stay-vigilant/id=18966/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counterfeiting, A Growing Worldwide Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/14/counterfeiting-a-growing-worldwide-problem/id=18428/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/14/counterfeiting-a-growing-worldwide-problem/id=18428/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camorra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Haddad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Zetas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organized crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosetta stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Espinel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=18428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Counterfeiting is a far bigger story than loses to big companies and the associated loss of downstream economic activity.  Those that support counterfeiters by buying knock-off goods are also increasingly supporting organized crime, including drug cartels, who are increasingly looking to the generous profits that can be earned and exceptionally low jail terms even if they do get caught. In fact, the largest Italian organized crime group is estimated to receive 10% of its annual $25 billion from counterfeited and pirated goods.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/08/one-grave-problem-counterfeiting-piracy-ip-theft/id=16838/' rel='bookmark' title='One Grave Problem: Counterfeiting, Piracy and IP Theft'>One Grave Problem: Counterfeiting, Piracy and IP Theft</a><small>Criminals are finding that the penalties for intellectual property crimes pale in comparison to the penalties they would receive for trafficking drugs and engaging in other illicit activities. At the same time, the profit margin for counterfeit software is extremely high. So the combination of great riches, relatively low penalties and a low likelihood of being caught and you can see why criminal enterprises, including terrorist networks, are becoming major players in the counterfeit software black-market. In fact, one of the most vicious drug cartels in the world makes an estimated $2.4 million per day selling counterfeit software. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/08/croc-counterfeiters-in-china-get-jail-time/id=31121/' rel='bookmark' title='Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time'>Croc Counterfeiters in China get Jail Time</a><small>Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX) announced earlier today that Chinese courts have sentenced 18 individuals to a total of more than 46 years in prison for producing and selling counterfeit Crocs goods. Seventeen individuals were convicted of counterfeiting, and two of the 17 also were convicted of offering bribes. Another individual also was convicted on bribery charges in connection with production of counterfeit Crocs™ shoes. In addition to prison sentences, the above men together face fines totaling RMB 2,832,500 (approximately $450,896)....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/11/combating-counterfeiting-and-unauthorized-product-sales/id=25361/' rel='bookmark' title='Combating Counterfeiting and Unauthorized Product Sales'>Combating Counterfeiting and Unauthorized Product Sales</a><small>Criminals on all levels — from opportunistic, small-time thieves to major drug cartels — are finding that the penalties for intellectual property crimes pale in comparison to the penalties they would receive for trafficking drugs and engaging in other illicit activities. At the same time, the profit margin for counterfeit software, as well as for other counterfeit goods, is extremely high. So the combination of great riches, relatively low penalties and a low likelihood of being caught and you can see why criminal enterprises, including terrorist networks, are becoming major players in the counterfeit software black-market....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/14/counterfeiting-a-growing-worldwide-problem/id=18428/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Grave Problem: Counterfeiting, Piracy and IP Theft</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/08/one-grave-problem-counterfeiting-piracy-ip-theft/id=16838/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/08/one-grave-problem-counterfeiting-piracy-ip-theft/id=16838/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 15:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary locke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael wu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosetta stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world intellectual property day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=16838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criminals are finding that the penalties for intellectual property crimes pale in comparison to the penalties they would receive for trafficking drugs and engaging in other illicit activities.  At the same time, the profit margin for counterfeit software is extremely high.  So the combination of great riches, relatively low penalties and a low likelihood of being caught and you can see why criminal enterprises, including terrorist networks, are becoming major players in the counterfeit software black-market.  In fact, one of the most vicious drug cartels in the world makes an estimated $2.4 million per day selling counterfeit software. <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/06/indifference-fuels-software-piracy/id=11520/' rel='bookmark' title='Culture of Indifference Fuels Software Piracy Market'>Culture of Indifference Fuels Software Piracy Market</a><small>The reality is that individuals and companies fuel the piracy market. Simply stated, if there were no demand there would be no supply, so it is quite disingenuous for us to only point the finger at the supplier, but rather we ought to acknowledge that there is plenty of blame to go around, which may be a hard pill to swallow. And while there may an intellectual distinction between sharing software or music with a friend or family member, there exists a cultural indifference that borders on contempt for the rights of creators....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/14/counterfeiting-a-growing-worldwide-problem/id=18428/' rel='bookmark' title='Counterfeiting, A Growing Worldwide Problem'>Counterfeiting, A Growing Worldwide Problem</a><small>Counterfeiting is a far bigger story than loses to big companies and the associated loss of downstream economic activity. Those that support counterfeiters by buying knock-off goods are also increasingly supporting organized crime, including drug cartels, who are increasingly looking to the generous profits that can be earned and exceptionally low jail terms even if they do get caught. In fact, the largest Italian organized crime group is estimated to receive 10% of its annual $25 billion from counterfeited and pirated goods....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/30/us-trade-representative-issues-annual-report-on-global-ip-rights/id=10356/' rel='bookmark' title='US Trade Representative Issues Annual Report on Global IP Rights'>US Trade Representative Issues Annual Report on Global IP Rights</a><small>For 2010 the US Trade Representative reviewed 77 trading partners for this year’s Special 301 Report, and placed 41 countries on either the Priority Watch List, Watch List, or the Section 306 monitoring list. The Priority Watch List for 2010 names the following countries:China, Russia, Algeria, Argentina, Canada, Chile, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Thailand and Venezuela. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/08/one-grave-problem-counterfeiting-piracy-ip-theft/id=16838/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/28/protecting-your-intellectual-property-in-china/id=16030/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/28/protecting-your-intellectual-property-in-china/id=16030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chen fuli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan anthony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=16030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The China Road Show is a series of two-day China IP events that the USPTO is hosting across the country to help educate businesses about the realities of piracy and counterfeiting—which cost the American economy approximately $250 billion annually.  Day 1 is largely devoted to understanding the patent, trademark and copyright laws in China, as well as enforcement of those rights.  Day 2 of the seminar will address § 337 Infringement Investigations by the International Trade Commission (ITC), the challenges presented by counterfeiting and piracy on the Internet and the development of global IP strategies even for small businesses.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/22/combating-copyright-infringement-dmca-take-down-notices/id=14470/' rel='bookmark' title='Combating Copyright Infringement: DMCA Take Down Notices'>Combating Copyright Infringement: DMCA Take Down Notices</a><small>We shouldn't fool ourselves and try and pretend that the lack of respect for intellectual property rights is limited to those who seek to share movies, music or make a buck selling knock-off products. Everyone who produces original content on the Internet is at risk of having that content stolen; simply cut and pasted onto some other website or blog. Even if it is not passed off as original content and you do get "credit" the copyist is using your work for their own benefit. They are stealing eyeballs, diverting traffic and likely costing you money. At the very least,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/29/wine-spirits-industry-fight-chinese-counterfeiting/id=14760/' rel='bookmark' title='Wine &amp; Spirits Industry Fight Chinese Counterfeiting'>Wine &#038; Spirits Industry Fight Chinese Counterfeiting</a><small>It is unfortunate for businesses, but China is becoming practically synonymous with intellectual property theft, piracy and counterfeiting. On top of that, many technology companies are learning that doing licensing deals with the Chinese means they turn over the technologies and as soon as the Chinese corporation is capable of employing the technology the sever the relationship and then compete against American companies with American technology, they just don't have to recoup the research and development costs and they have a cheap labor force....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/08/one-grave-problem-counterfeiting-piracy-ip-theft/id=16838/' rel='bookmark' title='One Grave Problem: Counterfeiting, Piracy and IP Theft'>One Grave Problem: Counterfeiting, Piracy and IP Theft</a><small>Criminals are finding that the penalties for intellectual property crimes pale in comparison to the penalties they would receive for trafficking drugs and engaging in other illicit activities. At the same time, the profit margin for counterfeit software is extremely high. So the combination of great riches, relatively low penalties and a low likelihood of being caught and you can see why criminal enterprises, including terrorist networks, are becoming major players in the counterfeit software black-market. In fact, one of the most vicious drug cartels in the world makes an estimated $2.4 million per day selling counterfeit software. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/28/protecting-your-intellectual-property-in-china/id=16030/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
