<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; David Kappos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/david-kappos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kappos on Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Proceedings</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/27/kappos-on-patent-trial-and-appeal-board-trial-proceedings/id=38077/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/27/kappos-on-patent-trial-and-appeal-board-trial-proceedings/id=38077/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents Post Issuance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practising Law Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex parte reexamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trial and Appeal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post grant procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post grant review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reexam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reexamination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=38077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kappos explained that the PTAB has started and will continue, in at least some cases, to issue shorter per curiam decisions, which will allow them to decide more cases and move through the backlog. Co-Chair of the program, Rob Sterne, asked Kappos whether this would present problems for those who might want to appeal to the Federal Circuit. Given the standards applied by the Federal Circuit will it be possible for an applicant ever be able to satisfy the standards? Kappos acknowledged that is a concern and why we will see hundreds of shorter per curiam decisions rather than thousands. Kappos explained that the USPTO wants these types of decisions issued only when the record is extremely clear, making a detailed decision of the Board less necessary.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/david-kappos-headlines-post-grant-patent-trial-program-in-ny/id=37847/' rel='bookmark' title='David Kappos Headlines Post-Grant Patent Trial Program in NY'>David Kappos Headlines Post-Grant Patent Trial Program in NY</a><small>A new addition to the program just announced today is David Kappos, who is the immediate former Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Kappos, a life-long employee of IBM prior to taking charge of the USPTO, is now with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City. Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. His segment will run from 9:15 am to 10:15 am. In addition to being presented...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/25/practice-before-the-patent-trial-and-appeal-board/id=25482/' rel='bookmark' title='Practice Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board'>Practice Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board</a><small>The one thing that will be markedly different from federal court practice, however, is that for the most part only registered Patent Attorneys or Patent Agents will be able to appear before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The Patent Office considered broadly permitting practitioners not registered to practice by the Office to represent parties at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Notwithstanding, the Patent Office decided against allowing non-registered practitioners from representing parties at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board the proposed rules set forth in February 2012. The USPTO explained this was because they believed that making the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/10/torpedoing-patent-rights/id=18022/' rel='bookmark' title='Torpedoing Patent Rights'>Torpedoing Patent Rights</a><small>The vast number of America’s companies that need patents to prosper and grow should fear the post-grant provisions for challenging patents in H.R. 1249, the patent reform bill passed last month by the House of Representatives. In a system already plagued by delays in granting patents, they threaten to delay courts from enforcing patents once finally granted. This threat has received little attention, perhaps because advocates of the bill promise promptness that they cannot deliver....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/27/kappos-on-patent-trial-and-appeal-board-trial-proceedings/id=38077/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Kappos Headlines Post-Grant Patent Trial Program in NY</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/david-kappos-headlines-post-grant-patent-trial-program-in-ny/id=37847/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/david-kappos-headlines-post-grant-patent-trial-program-in-ny/id=37847/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 01:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practising Law Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covered business methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivation proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex parte reexamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inter partes review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post grant procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post grant review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reexamination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=37847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new addition to the program just announced today is David Kappos, who is the immediate former Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Kappos, a life-long employee of IBM prior to taking charge of the USPTO, is now with Cravath, Swaine &#038; Moore LLP in New York City.  Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. His segment will run from 9:15 am to 10:15 am. In addition to being presented live in New York City the program will also be webcast.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/09/pto-proposes-rules-of-practice-for-patent-trials-before-board/id=22209/' rel='bookmark' title='PTO Proposes Rules of Practice for Patent Trials before Board'>PTO Proposes Rules of Practice for Patent Trials before Board</a><small>The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has proposed a consolidated set of rules related to trial practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The proposed rules implement the provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act relating to inter partes review, post-grant review, the transitional program for covered business method patents, and derivation proceedings....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/27/kappos-on-patent-trial-and-appeal-board-trial-proceedings/id=38077/' rel='bookmark' title='Kappos on Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Proceedings'>Kappos on Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Proceedings</a><small>Kappos explained that the PTAB has started and will continue, in at least some cases, to issue shorter per curiam decisions, which will allow them to decide more cases and move through the backlog. Co-Chair of the program, Rob Sterne, asked Kappos whether this would present problems for those who might want to appeal to the Federal Circuit. Given the standards applied by the Federal Circuit will it be possible for an applicant ever be able to satisfy the standards? Kappos acknowledged that is a concern and why we will see hundreds of shorter per curiam decisions rather than thousands....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/10/24/america-invents-the-unintended-consequences-of-patent-reform/id=19991/' rel='bookmark' title='America Invents: The Unintended Consequences of Patent Reform'>America Invents: The Unintended Consequences of Patent Reform</a><small>Notwithstanding the inherent unreliability of legislative history and the truly scary prospect of trying to get inside the head of Members of Congress, it seems fairly clear to me that the America Invents Act, which was signed into law by President Obama on September 16, 2012, contains at least a handful of things that can only be characterized as unintended consequences. Among them are: (1) U.S. patents issued from foreign filings will be prior art as of the foreign filing date; (2) commonly owned patent applications cannot be used against each other for novelty purposes; and (3) the creation of...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/david-kappos-headlines-post-grant-patent-trial-program-in-ny/id=37847/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kappos Joins Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore in New York</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/06/kappos-joins-cravath-swaine-moore-in-new-york/id=34947/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/06/kappos-joins-cravath-swaine-moore-in-new-york/id=34947/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cravath Swaine & Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=34947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today Cravath, Swaine &#038; Moore LLP announced that David J. Kappos, former Under Secretary of Commerce and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), joined the Firm as a partner. The Wall Street Journal Law Blog points out that this is only the fourth lateral hire by Cravath in the last 50 years. Indeed, Cravath is not a firm know to play the revolving door lateral hiring game, but obviously couldn't pass up the opportunity to add a talent of the likes of David Kappos. He is listed on the Cravath website as being a member of Cravath's corporate law group.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/16/stephen-kong-joins-stradling-yocca-in-santa-monica-office/id=30273/' rel='bookmark' title='Senior Sony PlayStation Attorney Stephen Kong Joins Stradling Yocca'>Senior Sony PlayStation Attorney Stephen Kong Joins Stradling Yocca</a><small>Prior to joining Stradling, Mr. Kong was Senior Corporate Counsel for Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC. While at Sony PlayStation, he was the lead attorney for the US R&D and Strategic Business Development Groups for the Sony entity responsible for Sony PlayStation matters in North and Latin America....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/12/womble-carlyle-expands-ip-and-life-science-litigation-teams/id=29068/' rel='bookmark' title='Womble Carlyle Expands IP and Life Science Litigation Teams'>Womble Carlyle Expands IP and Life Science Litigation Teams</a><small>In October, Life Science litigators Mary Bourke, Mark Pino, Kristen Cramer, Dana Severance and Daniel Attaway joined the firm from Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP, an intellectual property law firm located in Delaware, which not lists 52 attorneys on their firm website. These laterals include three partners and two associates. Veteran IP litigators Barry Herman and Behrooz Shariati also joined the firm in June and July, respectively. According to the firm's website Womble Carlyle now has 547 attorneys and 89 attorneys operating within a broadly defined Intellectual Property practice group....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/08/3-new-intellectual-property-members-for-mcdonald-hopkins/id=28645/' rel='bookmark' title='3 New Intellectual Property Members for McDonald Hopkins'>3 New Intellectual Property Members for McDonald Hopkins</a><small>McDonald Hopkins LLC, a law firm with offices in Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus, Detroit, Miami, and West Palm Beach, just announced the election of three new intellectual property attorneys to the firm's membership. The intellectual property attorneys being elevated to Member at McDonald Hopkins are: Todd A. Benni, Joseph J. Crimaldi and Scott M. Slaby. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/06/kappos-joins-cravath-swaine-moore-in-new-york/id=34947/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Capable Hands: Profiling the New Leadership at the PTO</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/31/in-capable-hands-profiling-the-new-leadership-at-the-pto/id=34464/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/31/in-capable-hands-profiling-the-new-leadership-at-the-pto/id=34464/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernie knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief of staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commissioner for Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commissioner for Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debbie cohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Cohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hira Perlmutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john owens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James Donald Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peggy focarino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter pappas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pto director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray chen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teresa (Terry) Stanek Rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teresa rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teresa stanek rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terry rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terry stanek rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Elmer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=34464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before profiling the top officials who will continue the work of the patent system, allow me also to pause and recognize a truly extraordinary moment in Patent Office History. The top three officials at the USPTO will all be women. Acting Director Teresa Rea, Commissioner for Patents Peggy Focarino and Commissioner for Trademarks Deborah Cohn will lead the Office forward steering America's engine of innovation and commerce. If that doesn't create a buzz of excitement even in Washington, DC, I don't know what will! It is excitement well deserved and perhaps could lead to a higher profile for the USPTO, which would be very good for the patent system as a whole.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/11/10/peter-pappas-appointed-as-kappos-new-chief-of-staff/id=20374/' rel='bookmark' title='Peter Pappas Appointed as Kappos&#8217; New Chief of Staff'>Peter Pappas Appointed as Kappos&#8217; New Chief of Staff</a><small>Effectively immediately Pappas is the new Chief of Staff and the immediate past Chief of Staff, Drew Hirschfeld, will assume the role of Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, which for a long time has been a key role within senior management at the USPTO....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/08/04/behind-the-scenes-the-uspto-senior-staff/id=11928/' rel='bookmark' title='Behind the Scenes: The USPTO Senior Staff'>Behind the Scenes: The USPTO Senior Staff</a><small>On July 19, 2010, I was granted behind the scenes access to observe the United States Patent and Trademark Office. From 11am to 7pm I trailed David Kappos, the Undersecretary for Commerce for Intellectual Property and the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. My hosts for the day were primarily Peter Pappas, Chief Communications Officer and Senior Advisor to Kappos, and one of his top lieutenants, Jennifer Rankin Byrne. As I went through the day I met members of the Senior Staff, some of whom I already knew and others who I was meeting for the first...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/womens-history-month-pto-womens-symposium-in-shreveport/id=22653/' rel='bookmark' title='Women&#8217;s History Month: PTO Women&#8217;s Symposium in Shreveport'>Women&#8217;s History Month: PTO Women&#8217;s Symposium in Shreveport</a><small>Later in the month in Shreveport, Louisiana, the USPTO will hold its 2nd Annual Women's Entrepreneur Symposium. This event will take place from March 25 - 26, 2012, and is co-sponsored by the USPTO, U.S. Senator Mary L. Landrieu and Cedric B. Glover, mayor of the City of Shreveport. The event will take place at the Shreveport Convention Center, and the symposium has blocked rooms at the Hilton Shreveport. Our very own Social Media Diva™, Renee Quinn, will be speaking at the symposium on the topic of building relationships. The full title of Renee's presentation is From Inventor to Entrepreneur:...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/31/in-capable-hands-profiling-the-new-leadership-at-the-pto/id=34464/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Kappos &#8211; The Exit Interview</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/29/david-kappos-the-exit-interview/id=33813/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/29/david-kappos-the-exit-interview/id=33813/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews & Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kappos Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pto director]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=33813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kappos era at the USPTO also largely coincides with the time frame where I started to write daily (sometimes more). I attend public events at the USPTO and have interviewed Director Kappos several times and most of his top lieutenants.  I have gotten to know Director Kappos and have seen first hand what his leadership has meant to not only the USPTO, but to the larger patent system in general. He has been a friend to the patent system and in my opinion is leaving the Patent Office far better than he found it.  He will be sorely missed when he leaves at the end of the month, although he will leave with an excellent management team in place to carry forward the work for which he has laid the foundation.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/26/david-kappos-to-leave-the-uspto/id=30590/' rel='bookmark' title='David Kappos to Leave the USPTO'>David Kappos to Leave the USPTO</a><small>I have just learned that David Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, will be stepping down and leaving the agency effective the end of January 2013. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/08/02/david-kappos-interview/id=11882/' rel='bookmark' title='Interview Exclusive: USPTO Director David Kappos'>Interview Exclusive: USPTO Director David Kappos</a><small>In this interview Kappos discusses with me his management style, his famously long hours, how he manages to inspire the Office to work harder than ever before, his efforts to get funding for the Office, how the USPTO can help innovators create new businesses and new jobs, and how to inspire young people to do public service. We also learn that he and Judge Rader share the same favorite movie (see Judge Rader Interview at the end), he likes Star Trek and Star Wars equally (an astute political answer no doubt) and the famous American inventor he would like to...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/13/uspto-one-of-the-best-places-to-work/id=31403/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO: One of the Best Places to Work'>USPTO: One of the Best Places to Work</a><small>Earlier today the United States Patent and Trademark Office received special recognition as one of the best places to work in the United States federal government. The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government® rankings draw on responses from nearly 700,000 civil servants to produce a detailed view of employee satisfaction and commitment across 362 federal agencies and subcomponents. With a score of 80.3, the USPTO ranked #5 out of 290 in the agency subcomponent category....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/29/david-kappos-the-exit-interview/id=33813/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The David Kappos Era at the USPTO</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/21/the-david-kappos-era-at-the-uspto/id=33657/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/21/the-david-kappos-era-at-the-uspto/id=33657/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent allowance rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent backlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=33657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you ask me the Kappos legacy is not going to be the America Invents Act. The Kappos legacy will be that he managed to put the USPTO back on track. The agency is open for business and is issuing patents. It is odd to say it, but the USPTO had become so dysfunctional over the years that the allowance rate had slipped to never before seen lows. The feeling was that the USPTO was the "No Patent for You Office," which did nothing to help foster the growth of innovation, and more importantly jobs.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/10/14/allowance-rate-uspto-fiscal-2010/id=12794/' rel='bookmark' title='Allowance Rate of 45.6% at USPTO for Fiscal 2010'>Allowance Rate of 45.6% at USPTO for Fiscal 2010</a><small>Hopefully the seemingly modest successes of team Kappos in fiscal 2010 will be viewed for what they are, which is rather extraordinary, by our leaders in Washington, DC. With all the odds against them, having to fight daily for adequate funding, fewer patent examiners and a Congress that STILL siphons money paid by innovators away from the Patent Office, team Kappos was still able to increase allowances by 5.3% and dent the backlog. Can you imagine what they could do with adequate funding? ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/26/david-kappos-to-leave-the-uspto/id=30590/' rel='bookmark' title='David Kappos to Leave the USPTO'>David Kappos to Leave the USPTO</a><small>I have just learned that David Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, will be stepping down and leaving the agency effective the end of January 2013. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/13/uspto-one-of-the-best-places-to-work/id=31403/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO: One of the Best Places to Work'>USPTO: One of the Best Places to Work</a><small>Earlier today the United States Patent and Trademark Office received special recognition as one of the best places to work in the United States federal government. The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government® rankings draw on responses from nearly 700,000 civil servants to produce a detailed view of employee satisfaction and commitment across 362 federal agencies and subcomponents. With a score of 80.3, the USPTO ranked #5 out of 290 in the agency subcomponent category....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/21/the-david-kappos-era-at-the-uspto/id=33657/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industry Insiders Reflect on Biggest Moments in IP for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/27/industry-insiders-reflect-on-biggest-moments-in-ip-for-2012/id=31924/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/27/industry-insiders-reflect-on-biggest-moments-in-ip-for-2012/id=31924/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America Invents Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beth Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akamai Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america invents act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beth hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob stoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLS Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLS Bank v. Alice Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kunin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marla grossman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayo v. Prometheus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myriad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myriad genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prometheus laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate judiciary committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve kunin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=31924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For this inaugural edition of ?Biggest Moments in IP? we have a variety of reflections on a wide array of IP issues. Former Commissioner for Patents Bob Stoll walked through some of the biggest items on the patent docket for the year. Former staffer to Senator Leahy (D-VT) and current lobbyist Marla Grossman reflects on Senator Leahy's decision to refuse the Chairmanship of the Senate Appropriations Committee to stay on as Chair of the Judiciary Committee. IP attorney and frequent feature contributor to IPWatchdog.com Beth Hutchens focuses on several copyright and first amendment issues.  Then Stephen Kunin of Oblon Spivak gives us his Top 10 list in David Letterman style. <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/02/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-senate-reform-bill/id=2426/' rel='bookmark' title='Senate Judiciary Committee Passes Patent Reform Bill'>Senate Judiciary Committee Passes Patent Reform Bill</a><small>As I sit here listening to the Executive Meeting of the Judiciary Committee on patent reform, things are getting extremely contentious.  Senator Specter (R-PA) has said that he would rather wait and not vote this bill out of Committee until Senator Kyl (R-AZ) has an opportunity to submit his amendments relative to the post-grant review [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/06/kappos-nomination-unanimously-forwarded-to-full-senate/id=4795/' rel='bookmark' title='Kappos Nomination Unanimously Forwarded to Full Senate'>Kappos Nomination Unanimously Forwarded to Full Senate</a><small>Earlier today the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to advance the nomination of David Kappos, former Vice President and Assistant General Counsel for IBM, to be Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, a job that also comes with the title of Director of the Patent and Trademark Office.  The vote in the Judiciary Committee was unanimous, [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/26/leahy-procedural-move-makes-patent-reform-passage-near/id=10281/' rel='bookmark' title='Leahy Procedural Move Makes Patent Reform Passage Near'>Leahy Procedural Move Makes Patent Reform Passage Near</a><small>Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) recently came to agreement with Committee Ranking Republican Jeff Sessions (R-AL) on changes to the Patent Reform Act of 2009 (S. 515), winning Senator Sessions’ support for passage and making it extremely likely that patent reform will happen this year, and likely very soon. An individual involved in [...]...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/27/industry-insiders-reflect-on-biggest-moments-in-ip-for-2012/id=31924/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Night at the Smithsonian, Patent Style</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/12/a-night-at-the-smithsonian-patent-style/id=31377/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/12/a-night-at-the-smithsonian-patent-style/id=31377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Kipman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernie knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Olson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Judge Michel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property owners association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge holderman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis foreman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national inventor of the year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q. Todd Dickinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[todd dickinson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=31377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year the IPO recognized Alex Kipman of Microsoft, the inventor of Kinect, as the 39th Inventor of the Year. Kipman was introduced and presented the award by David Kappos, the outgoing Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The fact that Kappos was the presenter allowed the IPO to sneak in a moment of appreciation for all that Kappos has done for the patent and innovation communities. For his efforts, and to say thank you, those in attendance gave Director Kappos a standing ovation.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/07/ipo-to-award-national-inventor-of-the-year-to-kinect-inventor/id=31088/' rel='bookmark' title='IPO to Award National Inventor of the Year to Kinect Inventor'>IPO to Award National Inventor of the Year to Kinect Inventor</a><small>On Monday, December 10, 2012, Intellectual Property Owners Education Foundation will honor 39th Annual National Inventor of the Year Alex Kipman, 2012 Distinguished IP Professional Judge James Holderman, and the six winners of the Second Annual IP Video Contest, in a ceremony at the Smithsonian American Art Museum and National Portrait Gallery....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/06/11/ipo-awards-dinner/id=11120/' rel='bookmark' title='IPO Honors Judge Michel and Dupont Inventors at Smithsonian'>IPO Honors Judge Michel and Dupont Inventors at Smithsonian</a><small>At these types of ceremonies everyone says such nice things, but what Judges Newman, Linn and Lourie said about Judge Michel seemed particularly heartfelt, and they seemed almost saddened to see their friend choose to leave and set out to make a difference advocating rather than opining. The video also included flattering comments from Chief Judge Anthony Joseph Scirica of the Third Circuit, one of Judge Michel's former clerks and executives of the IPO. It was extremely tasteful, gave an appropriate but not lingering recap of his career and did not linger or go on at an uncomfortable length as...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/03/tips-for-assisting-the-judge-and-jury-in-patent-cases/id=2441/' rel='bookmark' title='Tips for Assisting the Judge and Jury in Patent Cases'>Tips for Assisting the Judge and Jury in Patent Cases</a><small>The program this morning ran a bit long, and we are behind, but there is such great information being covered here at the Improving Patent Adjudication Through ADR and Federal Court Reform symposium being sponsored by the Thomas Jefferson School of Law.  One particular presentation that was exceptional (and there have been many) is the [...]...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/12/a-night-at-the-smithsonian-patent-style/id=31377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forfeiting the Future Over Irrational Fear of Software Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/06/forfeiting-the-future-over-irrational-fear-of-software-patents/id=30957/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/06/forfeiting-the-future-over-irrational-fear-of-software-patents/id=30957/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-patent Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Mossoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ars Technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center for american progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven't noticed America doesn't make anything any more, at least nothing that is tangible. Everything we buy is made in China, or Mexico or Viet Nam or somewhere else. The U.S. economy is based on intellectual property and the foundational intellectual property we have for the 21st century innovation based economy is software. We know from history that where patent rights are strongest is where companies locate, innovate and grow.  Where patent rights are weakest there is no foreign direct investment, companies do not go there and economies suffer. Once upon a time the UK dominated in biotechnology, but now the U.S. is dominant thanks to a strong and liberal patent system. If we curtail software patents we will be forfeiting not a single industry, but an enormous software industry AND any number of other industries and sub-industries in various other technology fields that rely upon the development of software.  Think bio-informatics, for example.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/03/lies-damn-lies-and-media-hatred-of-patents-and-the-cafc/id=28389/' rel='bookmark' title='Lies, Damn Lies and Media Hatred of Patents (and the CAFC)'>Lies, Damn Lies and Media Hatred of Patents (and the CAFC)</a><small>Indeed, few articles have struck a nerve in me quite the way that a recent Ars Technica article did. The article is titled How a rogue appeals court wrecked the patent system??. It is a cheap shot, factually inaccurate and embarrassingly incorrect "news" story that concludes the Federal Circuit is at the heart of all the problems in the patent system. A real Pinocchio tale. Ars Technica? should be ashamed at having published such an inaccurate attack piece. If they are not going to properly vet articles in advance of publication then what have they become? Little more than an...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/05/all-in-doubling-down-on-erroneous-attacks-on-the-federal-circuit/id=28588/' rel='bookmark' title='All In! Doubling Down on Erroneous Attacks on the Federal Circuit'>All In! Doubling Down on Erroneous Attacks on the Federal Circuit</a><small>In a recently published Forbes.com article titled"The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized Software Patents," Lee doubled down with his absurd and provably incorrect assertions regarding the patentability of software patents. But he also more or less sheepishly admitted that his reading of the most relevant case is not one that is widely accepted as correct by anyone other than himself. He wrote: "To be clear, plenty of people disagree with me about how Diehr should be interpreted." Thus, Lee admits that his primary assertion is one he created from whole cloth and contrary to the widely held views...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/02/world-intellectual-property-indicators-2012-design-patent-highlights/id=36290/' rel='bookmark' title='World Intellectual Property Indicators 2012: Design Patent Highlights'>World Intellectual Property Indicators 2012: Design Patent Highlights</a><small>The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) publishes a yearly report of the worldwide intellectual property filings. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2012 estimates draw from approximately 133 Patent offices, and include direct national and regional applications and those received through the Hague system of international registration. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/06/forfeiting-the-future-over-irrational-fear-of-software-patents/id=30957/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Examination of Software Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kappos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Patent Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer implemented methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer related inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Software patents, like all patents, are a form of innovation currency. They are also ecosystem enablers, and job creators. The innovation protected by software patents is highly integrated with hardware. All of it must remain eligible for protection. The current software patent “war” is hardly the first patent war—and unlikely to be the last in our nation’s patent history. Whenever breakthrough technologies come onto the scene, market players find themselves joined in the marketplace by new entrants. The first instinct of the breakthrough innovators is to bring patents into play. This is not only understandable, it is appropriate. Those who invest in breakthrough innovation have a right to expect others to respect their resultant IP. However, in the end, as history has shown time and time again, the players ultimately end up agreeing to pro-consumer solutions via licenses, cross-licenses or joint development agreements allowing core technologies to be shared.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/10/31/a-patent-for-software/id=20102/' rel='bookmark' title='A Patent for Software'>A Patent for Software</a><small>What If you created an automobile engine that could deliver 500 miles per gallon of gasoline would you seek a patent? I suspect you would because that type of engine would almost certainly be revolutionary. So why wouldn't you think about patenting a software system that more efficiently manages power consumption for a large office building? If you could reduce energy consumption by 25% wouldn't that be noteworthy? Of course, and it should be patentable as well. Legally it doesn't matter whether the advantage is created by an old world mechanical gadget or thanks to the constant monitoring and manipulation...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/18/building-better-software-patent-applications-embracing-means-plus-function-disclosure-requirements-in-the-algorithm-cases/id=24273/' rel='bookmark' title='Building Better Software Patent Applications: Embracing Means-Plus-Function Disclosure Requirements in the Algorithm Cases'>Building Better Software Patent Applications: Embracing Means-Plus-Function Disclosure Requirements in the Algorithm Cases</a><small>The disclosure requirements for these types of patent applications has been a moving target for years, which means that whatever the most stringent disclosure requirements are should become the target regardless of the types of claims you file. To ensure your software patent application has appropriate disclosure of the invention you should accept — even embrace — the requirements for having an appropriate means-plus-function disclosure. By meeting the strict standards set forth in the mean-plus-function algorithm cases you will file more detailed applications that have better disclosure and which will undoubtedly support more claims, thus making the resulting patent or...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/14/patent-drafting-defining-computer-implemented-processes/id=15758/' rel='bookmark' title='Patent Drafting: Defining Computer Implemented Processes'>Patent Drafting: Defining Computer Implemented Processes</a><small>So what information is required in order to demonstrate that there really is an invention that deserves to receive a patent? When examining computer implemented inventions the patent examiner will determine whether the specification discloses the computer and the algorithm (e.g., the necessary steps and/or flowcharts) that perform the claimed function in sufficient detail such that one of ordinary skill in the art can reasonably conclude that the inventor invented the claimed subject matter. An algorithm is defined by the Patent Offices as a finite sequence of steps for solving a logical or mathematical problem or performing a task. The...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/an-examination-of-software-patents/id=30747/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Kappos to Leave the USPTO</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/26/david-kappos-to-leave-the-uspto/id=30590/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/26/david-kappos-to-leave-the-uspto/id=30590/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pto director]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just learned that David Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, will be stepping down and leaving the agency effective the end of January 2013. <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/21/the-david-kappos-era-at-the-uspto/id=33657/' rel='bookmark' title='The David Kappos Era at the USPTO'>The David Kappos Era at the USPTO</a><small>if you ask me the Kappos legacy is not going to be the America Invents Act. The Kappos legacy will be that he managed to put the USPTO back on track. The agency is open for business and is issuing patents. It is odd to say it, but the USPTO had become so dysfunctional over the years that the allowance rate had slipped to never before seen lows. The feeling was that the USPTO was the "No Patent for You Office," which did nothing to help foster the growth of innovation, and more importantly jobs....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/13/uspto-one-of-the-best-places-to-work/id=31403/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO: One of the Best Places to Work'>USPTO: One of the Best Places to Work</a><small>Earlier today the United States Patent and Trademark Office received special recognition as one of the best places to work in the United States federal government. The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government® rankings draw on responses from nearly 700,000 civil servants to produce a detailed view of employee satisfaction and commitment across 362 federal agencies and subcomponents. With a score of 80.3, the USPTO ranked #5 out of 290 in the agency subcomponent category....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/29/david-kappos-the-exit-interview/id=33813/' rel='bookmark' title='David Kappos &#8211; The Exit Interview'>David Kappos &#8211; The Exit Interview</a><small>The Kappos era at the USPTO also largely coincides with the time frame where I started to write daily (sometimes more). I attend public events at the USPTO and have interviewed Director Kappos several times and most of his top lieutenants. I have gotten to know Director Kappos and have seen first hand what his leadership has meant to not only the USPTO, but to the larger patent system in general. He has been a friend to the patent system and in my opinion is leaving the Patent Office far better than he found it. He will be sorely missed...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/26/david-kappos-to-leave-the-uspto/id=30590/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 More Years: Patent Consequences and Other Election Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/07/4-more-years/id=29762/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/07/4-more-years/id=29762/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q. Todd Dickinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[todd dickinson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=29762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to the USPTO remaining in the capable hands of Director Kappos for the foreseeable future, with the reelection of President Obama that means that there could be a real possibility that AIPLA Executive Director, Q. Todd Dickinson, will be on any short list for future appointments to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. While no one knows for sure, given the age of Judges on the Federal Circuit it would seem likely that President Obama will have an opportunity to appoint at several Judges to the Court, and given the Court's workload they could and should be granted more Judgeships anyway.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/02/4-more-days-until-election-2012/id=29594/' rel='bookmark' title='4 More Days Until Election 2012'>4 More Days Until Election 2012</a><small>It is undeniable that the Director Kappos has revitalized the Patent Office, but does the fact that the Patent Office is now well run mean that President Obama has earned 4 more years?...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/12/top-10-reasons-republicans-might-oppose-the-patent-office/id=17645/' rel='bookmark' title='Top 10 Reasons Republicans Might Oppose the Patent Office'>Top 10 Reasons Republicans Might Oppose the Patent Office</a><small>Given that House Republicans seem to fear an adequately funded Patent Office I got to thinking — What could they be afraid of? With that in mind, here are the top 10 things that House Republicans must be afraid of as they seek to oppose an adequately funded Patent Office. Can you hear the black helicopter squad swirling overhead, conspiracy theories in hand? ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/01/21/the-david-kappos-era-at-the-uspto/id=33657/' rel='bookmark' title='The David Kappos Era at the USPTO'>The David Kappos Era at the USPTO</a><small>if you ask me the Kappos legacy is not going to be the America Invents Act. The Kappos legacy will be that he managed to put the USPTO back on track. The agency is open for business and is issuing patents. It is odd to say it, but the USPTO had become so dysfunctional over the years that the allowance rate had slipped to never before seen lows. The feeling was that the USPTO was the "No Patent for You Office," which did nothing to help foster the growth of innovation, and more importantly jobs....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/07/4-more-years/id=29762/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
