<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; dmca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/dmca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:38:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stopping Online Piracy in the Age of Entitlement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/03/stopping-online-piracy-in-the-age-of-entitlement/id=22111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/03/stopping-online-piracy-in-the-age-of-entitlement/id=22111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chamber of commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital millennium copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protesters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca MacKinnon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for the particulars of SOPA, perhaps there are some who are against the legislation for valid, thoughtful reasons and would like to see something better.  That, however, seems to be the substantial minority.  Those who are against SOPA seem to want to protect online piracy as if they are entitled to access the creative works of others for free.  In economic terms those who steal intellectual property are freeloaders. These freeloaders are just like the many non-productive members of society who only take and give nothing back, expecting those of us who are productive to pick up the tab for them.  There are certainly people in society who need and deserve help, and we should be there to help them, but by any fair estimate the entitlement mentality is running amok.  No one "needs and deserves" free access to the latest blockbuster movie the opened just yesterday in theaters.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/03/stopping-online-piracy-in-the-age-of-entitlement/id=22111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Copyright Theft: Content Creators Must Stay Vigilant</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/03/internet-copyright-theft-content-creators-must-stay-vigilant/id=18966/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/03/internet-copyright-theft-content-creators-must-stay-vigilant/id=18966/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fantasy football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=18966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changes were made in the copyright laws of the United States in order to ensure that what David LaMacchia did would be criminal in the future. Nevertheless, those changes to the copyright laws did not put an end to piracy on the Internet, nor could they have been realistically expected to do so. Corporations, entrepreneurs, artists and creators have lobbied the United States Congress for changes in the law to help them protect their copyrighted works, but they have also increasingly relied upon technological measures to protect their copyrighted works. While there is no legal requirement that a copyright holder take steps to secure or sequester material in order to avail themselves of the protection offered by U.S. copyright laws, there is no prohibition against copyright owners seeking to use technological means to preserve their rights. Prudence dictates content creators continually monitor to see if there is ongoing infringement, take steps to make such infringement more difficut and do whatever can be done to address infringement when (not if) it is discovered.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/03/internet-copyright-theft-content-creators-must-stay-vigilant/id=18966/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Stop Online Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/02/06/how-to-stop-online-copyright-infringement/id=15035/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/02/06/how-to-stop-online-copyright-infringement/id=15035/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 14:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital millennium copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=15035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright infringement has nothing to do with citation or linking back.  A copyright owners rights have been infringed if another reproduces the work without their permission with or without citation.  In the minds of some copyright infringement is synonymous with plagiarism.  Plagiarism, however, is the passing off of the work of another as your own without citation.  Legally, however, copyright infringement is merely copying, with or without appreciation of the wrong.  So those who cite and link back are not absolved from copyright infringement.  They are misappropriating an original work and free-riding.  There is nothing creative, laudatory or commendable about free-riding.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/02/06/how-to-stop-online-copyright-infringement/id=15035/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Combating Copyright Infringement: DMCA Take Down Notices</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/22/combating-copyright-infringement-dmca-take-down-notices/id=14470/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/22/combating-copyright-infringement-dmca-take-down-notices/id=14470/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=14470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We shouldn't fool ourselves and try and pretend that the lack of respect for intellectual property rights is limited to those who seek to share movies, music or make a buck selling knock-off products. Everyone who produces original content on the Internet is at risk of having that content stolen; simply cut and pasted onto some other website or blog. Even if it is not passed off as original content and you do get "credit" the copyist is using your work for their own benefit. They are stealing eyeballs, diverting traffic and likely costing you money. At the very least, they are free riding, which is a hard pill to swallow.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/22/combating-copyright-infringement-dmca-take-down-notices/id=14470/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outsourcing to India: National Security Subversion &amp; Job Loss</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/05/outsourcing-to-india-national-security-subversion-job-loss/id=14256/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/05/outsourcing-to-india-national-security-subversion-job-loss/id=14256/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export administration regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=14256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that the outsourcing of patent searches and the preparation of patent applications violates U.S. law only makes perfect sense, particularly when you factor into consideration the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 181 (re: national security) and 35 U.S.C. 184 (re: foreign filing licenses).  By openly and willingly tolerating the outsourcing of preparation work of patent applications the clear intention of 35 U.S.C. 181 is subverted.  What good does a secrecy order make if the the information relative to the invention has already been sent overseas?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/05/outsourcing-to-india-national-security-subversion-job-loss/id=14256/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perfect 10 v. Google: Naked Pictures Copyright Case Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/31/perfect-10-google-copyright/id=11849/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/31/perfect-10-google-copyright/id=11849/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central district of california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfect 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=11849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfect 10, Inc., the former publisher of Perfect 10 Magazine, is back at it with Google over whether Google's display of certain images of scantily clad women infringes the copyrights owned by Perfect 10. Perfect 10 created and sold pictures of nude models through a now defunct print magazine, and now creates and sells pictures through a password-protected subscription website. Simultaneous actions are pending in both United States and Canada, each with recent rulings over the last two weeks, with a ruling in Canada on July 18, 2010, and a ruling on Google's motion for summary judgment in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on July 26, 2010.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/31/perfect-10-google-copyright/id=11849/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dow Jones Sues Briefing.com Alleging Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/28/dow-jones-sues-briefing-com-alleging-copyright-infringement/id=10332/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/28/dow-jones-sues-briefing-com-alleging-copyright-infringement/id=10332/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[briefing.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern district of new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=10332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The complaint alleges that in some cases the republication and distribution occurs within a minute or two after the article is published by Dow Jones. In just one two-week period, Briefing.com copied a substantial portion of at least 100 articles and republished more than 70 headlines within three minutes of the initial publication on Dow Jones Newswires. Dow Jones alleges that this conduct violates Dow Jones' copyrights, amounts to "hot news" misappropriation, violates the DMCA and is otherwise unfair competition.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/28/dow-jones-sues-briefing-com-alleging-copyright-infringement/id=10332/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoominfo&#8217;s Blatant Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/28/zoominfos-blatant-copyright-infringement/id=5374/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/28/zoominfos-blatant-copyright-infringement/id=5374/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoominfo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=5374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while we do an Internet search to find out what is out there quoting to IPWatchdog.com or me personally.  We also try and make sure that others are not infringing upon our works by republishing our content without permission.  It is flattering in one sense to have people want to steal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/28/zoominfos-blatant-copyright-infringement/id=5374/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sample DMCA Take Down Letter</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/06/sample-dmca-take-down-letter/id=4501/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/06/sample-dmca-take-down-letter/id=4501/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample documents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It just came to my attention earlier today that someone had copied an entire article from IPWatchdog.com and posted it to their own website last week.  How is it possible that anyone doesn&#8217;t realize that you just cannot do that?  More likely, it is known that you cannot do that but people do it figuring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/06/sample-dmca-take-down-letter/id=4501/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recording Industry Victory in Usenet File Sharing Case</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/02/recording-industry-victory-in-usenet-file-sharing-case/id=4390/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/02/recording-industry-victory-in-usenet-file-sharing-case/id=4390/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Fantino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lisa fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usenet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recording industry has scored gold in its court battle with Usenet, which advertises itself as a massive online file sharing community. See: Arista Records v. Usenet, 07 Civ. 8822 (S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2009) The case, filed back in 2007, pitted the record companies against Usenet, with the recording industry alleging widespread infringement of copyrighted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/02/recording-industry-victory-in-usenet-file-sharing-case/id=4390/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

