<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; Licenseing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/licenseing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Acacia Research by the Numbers: Inside the Belly of the Beast</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/01/03/acacia-research-by-the-numbers-inside-the-belly-of-the-beast/id=21548/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/01/03/acacia-research-by-the-numbers-inside-the-belly-of-the-beast/id=21548/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Business & Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acacia research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inpex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licenseing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-practicing entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent assertion entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent troll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=21548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acacia has long been considered by many to be the mother of all patent trolls.  But are they really a patent troll?  The term "patent troll" is one that is nearly impossible to define given the reality that one man's patent troll is another man's innovator who just chooses to license.  Increasingly, however, the true bad actors in the non-practicing entity community are engaging in what the Federal Circuit has called extortion-like behavior.  Is Acacia Research one of those patent trolls that engages in mafioso tactics, or are they a godsend to inventors and small businesses who otherwise couldn't monetize their patent portfolios?<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/08/12/patent-trolls-cost-of-doing-business/id=12052/' rel='bookmark' title='Patent Trolls Just a Cost of Doing Business for Big Tech'>Patent Trolls Just a Cost of Doing Business for Big Tech</a><small>As so many run to condemn patent trolls and would like to compromise the integrity and strength of all patent rights to combat what they perceive as bad actors, I wonder whether patent trolls are really a drag on the high-tech industry. Are patent trolls really costing the industry, or is the industry making much ado about nothing? One theory holds that the tech industry is treating the patent troll phenomenon as nothing more than a nuisance, and a nuisance that is not worth doing anything about. I have for a long time stated that there are obvious strategies that...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/08/10/patent-trolls-acacia-research-funding/id=12017/' rel='bookmark' title='Mother of all Patent Trolls, Acacia Research, Gets More Funding'>Mother of all Patent Trolls, Acacia Research, Gets More Funding</a><small>Acacia Research Corporation (Nasdaq: ACTG), which in some circles is known as the mother of all patent trolls, announced today that a wholly-owned subsidiary has become the General Partner of the newly formed Acacia Intellectual Property Fund, L.P. The Fund, who together with the subsidiary, have provided a total of $27 million as an initial funding commitment. The Fund is authorized to raise up to $250 million, which should strike fear in the hearts of all of the likely targets of patent infringement lawsuits, namely those that make high tech products. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/09/patent-litigation-and-licensing-roundup/id=29799/' rel='bookmark' title='Patent Litigation Settlement Roundup'>Patent Litigation Settlement Roundup</a><small>On November 8, 2012, Mylan Inc. (Nasdaq: MYL) announced that it, along with Famy Care Ltd., has entered into a settlement agreement with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. that will resolve patent litigation related to Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo® Tablets, which are indicated for the prevention of pregnancy in women who elect to use oral contraceptives as a method of contraception. Also on November 8, Research Affiliates, LLC and WisdomTree Investments, Inc. (NASDAQ: WETF) announced that Research Affiliates will withdraw its patent infringement lawsuit brought against WisdomTree and pay WisdomTree $700,000. On October 31, 2012, Acacia Research Corporation (Nasdaq:ACTG) announced that its subsidiaries...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/01/03/acacia-research-by-the-numbers-inside-the-belly-of-the-beast/id=21548/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
