<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; marshall phelps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/marshall-phelps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ Says IP Exchange Licensing Model is Pro-Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/29/doj-says-ip-exchange-licensing-model-is-pro-innovation/id=38075/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/29/doj-says-ip-exchange-licensing-model-is-pro-innovation/id=38075/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard Pannekoek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPXI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=38075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IPXI is the first financial exchange that facilitates non-exclusive licensing and trading of intellectual property rights with market-based pricing and standardized terms. Earlier this week word came from the Intellectual Property Exchange International Inc. (IPXI) that the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division issued its Business Review Letter (BRL) upon the culmination of its eight-month review. The DOJ believes that the IP Exchange business model proposed by IPXI is capable of producing market efficiencies in the patent licensing arena and is likely to be pro-innovation. Although no permission is required of the DOJ before IPXI opens its exchange, having this review of the DOJ Antitrust Division complete has to make IPXI and Exchange participants much more at ease as the move closer toward their attempt to revolutionize IP licensing.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/17/ip-exchange-brings-market-principles-to-patent-rights-acquisition/id=25452/' rel='bookmark' title='IP Exchange Brings Market Principles to Patent Rights Acquisition'>IP Exchange Brings Market Principles to Patent Rights Acquisition</a><small>It is also probably correct to say that the current business model for licensing technologies is extremely inefficient, not only because of the lack of a central clearinghouse, but because many of those who would be most interested in acquiring rights to exciting new technologies are really too small to attract the interest of patent owners. Even if they are large enough to attract interest from patent owners it take real time and real money to acquire rights. You don't simply walk into a neighborhood bodega and order the rights to X technology for Y dollars, put it into your...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/29/will-an-intellectual-property-licensing-exchange-work/id=25068/' rel='bookmark' title='Will an Intellectual Property Licensing Exchange Work?'>Will an Intellectual Property Licensing Exchange Work?</a><small>Preventing artificial supply-side constraints? Now my spidey-senses are activated. That sure has a familiar ring to it, doesn't it? I am skeptical about the desire to eliminate market inefficiencies when combined with simultaneous attempts to drive down royalty payments, thereby compensating innovators only for some perceived benefit to the ultimate consumer. The goal of the first, to reduce inefficiencies in a bilateral licensing negotiation is laudable, but minimizing the "artificial supply side constraints" based on the market as viewed by the ultimate consumer is a recipe for undervaluing innovative value-adds. And let's not forget that some (perhaps many) of these...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/19/ftc-doj-to-hold-workshop-on-patent-assertion-entity-activities/id=30428/' rel='bookmark' title='FTC, DOJ to Hold Workshop on Patent Assertion Entity Activities'>FTC, DOJ to Hold Workshop on Patent Assertion Entity Activities</a><small>This workshop will examine the economic and legal implications of patent assertion entity (PAE) activity, as distinct from prototypical “non-practicing entity” (NPE) activity, such as developing and transferring technology. By contrast, PAE activities often include purchasing patents from existing owners and seeking to maximize revenues by licensing the intellectual property to (or litigating against) manufacturers who are already using the patented technology. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/29/doj-says-ip-exchange-licensing-model-is-pro-innovation/id=38075/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing Article One Partners</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/15/introducing-article-one-partners/id=26397/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/15/introducing-article-one-partners/id=26397/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article one partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheryl mil one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent searches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=26397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other reason AOP has been so success is also eluded to in Phelps' quote above as well.  Article One runs a "human network."  When I asked Cheryl what made Article One so successful she immediately responded "our researchers."  Indeed, their researchers are what makes the system work, and they have well over 1 million people registered as researchers and well over 23,000 active researchers who routinely submit prior art.  These researchers are located all across the world, with roughly one-thrid in the United States, roughly another one-third in Europe, about 10% in Japan and the rest spread elsewhere around the globe.  In addition to this geographic diversity, nearly 50% of researchers hold advanced degrees.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/09/show-me-the-money-article-one-reaches-1-million-milestone/id=15712/' rel='bookmark' title='Show Me the Money! Article One Reaches $1 Million Milestone'>Show Me the Money! Article One Reaches $1 Million Milestone</a><small>On Monday, March 7, 2011, Article One Partners announced that it had surpassed the $1 Million milestone and has now distributed over $1 million in reward money to Advisors. It would seem that Article One Partners is growing and thriving, and that my initial reaction to the Article One Partners business model was incorrect. In fact, Article One Partners is likely just scratching the surface of its potential and demonstrating the power of coordinated crowd sourcing solutions....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/' rel='bookmark' title='Crowdsourcing Patent Research: $2 Million in Reward Money'>Crowdsourcing Patent Research: $2 Million in Reward Money</a><small>Article One Partners (AOP), the world’s largest patent research community, earlier today announced that the company has achieved a significant milestone — more than $2 million dollars in financial incentives to its global research community. This milestone comes 11 months to the day from when Article One announced that they had reached the $1 million award milestone. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/23/article-one-partners-reaches-3-million-paid-to-patent-research-community/id=28930/' rel='bookmark' title='Article One Partners Reaches $3 Million Paid to Patent Research Community'>Article One Partners Reaches $3 Million Paid to Patent Research Community</a><small>AOP, the world’s largest patent research community, has passed another significant milestone. This time the company has passed the $3 million threshold in financial rewards paid to its global research community. Actually, the milestone was reached at the end of August 2012, but AOP only officially made the announcement last week. In fact, as of the writing of this article the reward calculator found prominently on the AOP homepage shows that some $3,371,500 in reward money has been paid to its community of crowdsourcing researchers....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/15/introducing-article-one-partners/id=26397/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile App Developers Gain Ally to Fight Patent Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/05/mobile-app-developers-gain-ally-to-fight-patent-infringement/id=25150/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/05/mobile-app-developers-gain-ally-to-fight-patent-infringement/id=25150/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appsterdam Legal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article one partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheryl milone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowd sourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Business Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-practicing entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent troll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trolling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=25150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a result of this announcement today, AOP will help Appsterdam accomplish the organizations mandate of supporting ongoing innovation and business success in the mobile app development community through research projects sent to its global, diverse and highly educated community.  The Appsterdam Foundation attorneys and developers will work with AOP to conduct patent research, harnessing the global reach of the AOP community, which has been used by many Fortune 500 companies to locate prior art that can be used against patents asserted against them.  While note every search conducted by Article One results in prior art that can be used to invalidate patent claims, many searches have found prior art that is then used in both federal court and at the United States Patent and Trademark Office during reexamination proceedings.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/10/07/revolutionizing-prior-art-research-how-crowdsourcing-could-save-the-angry-birds/id=19588/' rel='bookmark' title='Revolutionizing Prior Art Research: How Crowdsourcing Could Save the Angry Birds'>Revolutionizing Prior Art Research: How Crowdsourcing Could Save the Angry Birds</a><small>The question may arise – what if the result of crowdsourcing is less than the proverbial "smoking gun," can it place the App Developers at a disadvantage in court? Case law indicates that the answer is no. Last year, in a patent litigation brought by Personal Audio LLC, the plaintiff attempted to argue that their patent was valid based on crowdsourced research and to seek discovery on this basis. Personal Audio lost on both counts, with federal Judge Miriam Cedarbaum concluding, “eliminating a negative doesn’t show validity" and commenting on the patent owner’s approach with the statement “that’s what I...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/12/10/article-one-partners-launches-public-review-of-ntp-patents/id=13717/' rel='bookmark' title='Article One Partners Launches Public Review of NTP Patents'>Article One Partners Launches Public Review of NTP Patents</a><small>Article One Partners announced yesterday that patents held by NTP Incorporated are the focus of three new requests for research, which Article One Partners refers to as Patent Studies. NTP was made famous for its litigation against BlackBerry maker Research-in-Motion (RIM) that resulted in a settlement north of $600 million. New litigation by NTP has expanded the assertion of patent infringement to other top players in the mobile and smartphone industry, which is prompting Article One Partners to engage their global community of researchers by challenging them to identify evidence predating the patents in question and which can be used...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/23/angry-birds-developer-sued-by-patent-troll/id=18312/' rel='bookmark' title='Angry Birds Developer Sued by Patent Troll'>Angry Birds Developer Sued by Patent Troll</a><small>On Thursday, July 21, 2011, attorneys for Lodsys LLC, who is rapidly becoming a reviled patent troll, filed an amended complaint in the United States Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. As a result of this amended complaint some big names in the gaming world have been brought into the ongoing patent litigation battles being waged by Lodsys, who has already suing a number of Apple App developers and others such as Best Buy and the New York Times, see here and here. More specifically, as a result of the filing of this latest complaint Lodsys has...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/06/05/mobile-app-developers-gain-ally-to-fight-patent-infringement/id=25150/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crowdsourcing Patent Research: $2 Million in Reward Money</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article one partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheryl milone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stacey anderson-redick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article One Partners (AOP), the world’s largest patent research community, earlier today announced that the company has achieved a significant milestone — more than $2 million dollars in financial incentives to its global research community. This milestone comes 11 months to the day from when Article One announced that they had reached the $1 million award milestone. <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/23/article-one-partners-reaches-3-million-paid-to-patent-research-community/id=28930/' rel='bookmark' title='Article One Partners Reaches $3 Million Paid to Patent Research Community'>Article One Partners Reaches $3 Million Paid to Patent Research Community</a><small>AOP, the world’s largest patent research community, has passed another significant milestone. This time the company has passed the $3 million threshold in financial rewards paid to its global research community. Actually, the milestone was reached at the end of August 2012, but AOP only officially made the announcement last week. In fact, as of the writing of this article the reward calculator found prominently on the AOP homepage shows that some $3,371,500 in reward money has been paid to its community of crowdsourcing researchers....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/08/07/sony-announces-partnership-with-article-one-to-fight-npes/id=27163/' rel='bookmark' title='Sony Announces Partnership with Article One to Fight NPEs'>Sony Announces Partnership with Article One to Fight NPEs</a><small>Article One Partners, or AOP for short, is the world’s largest patent research community. Yesterday the company announced a partnership with Sony Corporation. AOP is supporting Sony’s defense against the rising trend in patent disputes with non-practicing entities (NPEs). “We have chosen to expand our prior art research capabilities with Article One Partners and their global community of researchers,” said Fumihiko Moriya, VP, Sr. General Manager, IP Alliance & Licensing Dept., IP Division, Sony Corporation. “Our partnership with Article One enables Sony to identify highly relevant prior art to help defend against an increasing number of low-quality patent assertions."...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/09/show-me-the-money-article-one-reaches-1-million-milestone/id=15712/' rel='bookmark' title='Show Me the Money! Article One Reaches $1 Million Milestone'>Show Me the Money! Article One Reaches $1 Million Milestone</a><small>On Monday, March 7, 2011, Article One Partners announced that it had surpassed the $1 Million milestone and has now distributed over $1 million in reward money to Advisors. It would seem that Article One Partners is growing and thriving, and that my initial reaction to the Article One Partners business model was incorrect. In fact, Article One Partners is likely just scratching the surface of its potential and demonstrating the power of coordinated crowd sourcing solutions....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Special Thank You to Our Guest Contributors!</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/12/02/a-special-thank-you-to-our-guest-contributors/id=20777/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/12/02/a-special-thank-you-to-our-guest-contributors/id=20777/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aba blawg 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aba journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Zhang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american bar association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew beckerman-rodau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arlene zank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Cassidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beth hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Zeidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bryan lord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Gorenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheryl milone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Judge Michel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Spulber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david hricik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david nay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. John Hershey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eldora ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Guttag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F. Scott Kieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Michelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hank nothhaft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard bremer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Skaist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipwatchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipwatchdog blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipwatchdog.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Lander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james yang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeanne albrecht]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Shieh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Frueauf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john boyd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cronin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Michel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Mazur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manus cooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Lemley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark nowotarski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark summerfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marla grossman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Beth Tung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maureen veterano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael lin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael risch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle holoubek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monica talley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Epstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Fletcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert snoep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Katznelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewart walsh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=20777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years IPWatchdog.com has continued to try and add additional perspectives from a wide variety of guest contributors, ranging from well respected practicing attorneys and agents to high profile academics to inventors and pro-patent lobbyists. It is hard to imagine providing such depth of analysis on such an array of topics without having truly wonderful guest authors.  So we take this moment to say a very special thank you and to shine the spotlight on them. Each deserve to share in any recognition of IPWatchdog.com. Without further ado, here are the guest contributors in alphabetical order, along with their contributions for 2011.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/03/ipwatchdog-2010-aba-blawg-tops-over-2-million-visits/id=14187/' rel='bookmark' title='IPWatchdog 2010: ABA Blawg Tops + Over 2 Million Visits'>IPWatchdog 2010: ABA Blawg Tops + Over 2 Million Visits</a><small>I am pleased to announce that IPWatchdog.com was selected by the readers of the ABA Journal as their favorite IP Law blog for 2010 ABA. I am also pleased to announce that for 2010 we had over 2,000,000 visits, delivered nearly 11.8 million pages, our homepage was viewed 3.06 million times and we averaged over 67,000 unique monthly visitors! Thanks to all our readers for coming back day after day, and thanks to all of our Guest Contributors!...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/11/30/ipwatchdog-com-chosen-as-one-of-the-aba-journals-top-100/id=13598/' rel='bookmark' title='IPWatchdog.com Chosen as one of the ABA Journal&#8217;s Top 100'>IPWatchdog.com Chosen as one of the ABA Journal&#8217;s Top 100</a><small>I am pleased to announce that the Editors of the ABA Journal yesterday announced they have selected IPWatchdog.com as one of the top 100 best law blogs by lawyers, for lawyers. Now readers are being asked to vote on their favorites in each of the 4th Annual Blawg 100’s 12 categories. IPWatchdog.com is in the "IP Law" category. To vote, please visit The 2010 ABA Journal Blawg 100....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/01/02/industry-insiders-make-patent-wishes-for-2012/id=21452/' rel='bookmark' title='Industry Insiders Make Patent Wishes for 2012'>Industry Insiders Make Patent Wishes for 2012</a><small>It is that time of the year where we all start to look ahead to the new year, perhaps making some New Year resolutions that are sure to last for at least a few days. Resurrecting something done two years ago, I once again contacted some of my friends to get them to go on the record with their patent and innovation related wishes for 2012. I was lucky enough to get a number of very thoughtful responses from individuals with a variety of experiences....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/12/02/a-special-thank-you-to-our-guest-contributors/id=20777/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mining Patent Gold: What Every CEO Should Know</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/15/mining-patent-gold-what-every-ceo-should-know/id=19060/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/15/mining-patent-gold-what-every-ceo-should-know/id=19060/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Phelps &#38; John Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Business & Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cronin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=19060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The truth is that Google bought a great deal more than patents when it acquired Motorola, though there are doubtless some real gems in the Motorola portfolio. As a relative newcomer to the wireless arena, the search giant in one bold move got its hands on the unmatched innovation experience of the longest-lived mobile phone company on earth. The technical acumen and product experience of those thousands of mobile software and hardware engineers will prove hugely valuable to Google as it seeks to dominate the $250 billion global market in smartphones, especially if it decides to become a handset maker as Motorola had been.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/28/my-advice-to-google-keep-acquiring-patents/id=18879/' rel='bookmark' title='My Advice to Google &#8211; Keep Acquiring Patents'>My Advice to Google &#8211; Keep Acquiring Patents</a><small>Most patents are obtained simply on the “refrigeration theory” as I call it. Just like if you are in food service you won’t get far without the preserving effects of refrigeration. Everything spoils unless eaten immediately. Likewise in technology; without the coverage of a patent, everything spoils unless consumed forthwith (first mover advantage). The decision is simple: if it is worth doing, i.e., putting resources into, it is worth patenting. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/02/21/motorola-and-rim-sue-over-patents/id=124/' rel='bookmark' title='Motorola and RIM Sue Over Patents'>Motorola and RIM Sue Over Patents</a><small>Over the weekend both Motorola and Research In Motion sued each other.  On Saturday, February 16, 2008, Motorola sued RIM in United States Federal District Court for the District of Delaware, and also filed suit against RIM in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.  I wonder if that $432 million plaintiff&#8217;s verdict against Boston Scientific had anything to [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/27/the-smart-phone-patent-wars-what-the-frand-is-going-on/id=23635/' rel='bookmark' title='The Smart Phone Patent Wars: What the FRAND is Going On?'>The Smart Phone Patent Wars: What the FRAND is Going On?</a><small>This all came to a head when, on February 22, 2012, Microsoft Corporation filed a formal competition law complaint against Google with European Union antitrust regulators. Microsoft’s complaint was brought about because Google (i.e., Motorola Mobility) “has refused to make its patents available at anything remotely close to a reasonable price” and “attempting to block sales of Windows PCs, our Xbox game console and other products.” Well isn’t Google’s “maximum per-unit royalty of 2.25% of the net selling price for the relevant end product” in compliance with FRAND!? If you consider that often dozens (and sometimes, hundreds) of patents cover...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/15/mining-patent-gold-what-every-ceo-should-know/id=19060/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Show Me the Money! Article One Reaches $1 Million Milestone</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/09/show-me-the-money-article-one-reaches-1-million-milestone/id=15712/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/09/show-me-the-money-article-one-reaches-1-million-milestone/id=15712/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article one partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheryl milone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowd sourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior art]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=15712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, March 7, 2011, Article One Partners announced that it had surpassed the $1 Million milestone and has now distributed over $1 million in reward money to Advisors.  It would seem that Article One Partners is growing and thriving, and that my initial reaction to the Article One Partners business model was incorrect.  In fact, Article One Partners is likely just scratching the surface of its potential and demonstrating the power of coordinated crowd sourcing solutions.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/23/article-one-partners-reaches-3-million-paid-to-patent-research-community/id=28930/' rel='bookmark' title='Article One Partners Reaches $3 Million Paid to Patent Research Community'>Article One Partners Reaches $3 Million Paid to Patent Research Community</a><small>AOP, the world’s largest patent research community, has passed another significant milestone. This time the company has passed the $3 million threshold in financial rewards paid to its global research community. Actually, the milestone was reached at the end of August 2012, but AOP only officially made the announcement last week. In fact, as of the writing of this article the reward calculator found prominently on the AOP homepage shows that some $3,371,500 in reward money has been paid to its community of crowdsourcing researchers....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/08/07/sony-announces-partnership-with-article-one-to-fight-npes/id=27163/' rel='bookmark' title='Sony Announces Partnership with Article One to Fight NPEs'>Sony Announces Partnership with Article One to Fight NPEs</a><small>Article One Partners, or AOP for short, is the world’s largest patent research community. Yesterday the company announced a partnership with Sony Corporation. AOP is supporting Sony’s defense against the rising trend in patent disputes with non-practicing entities (NPEs). “We have chosen to expand our prior art research capabilities with Article One Partners and their global community of researchers,” said Fumihiko Moriya, VP, Sr. General Manager, IP Alliance & Licensing Dept., IP Division, Sony Corporation. “Our partnership with Article One enables Sony to identify highly relevant prior art to help defend against an increasing number of low-quality patent assertions."...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/07/crowdsourcing-patent-research-2-million-in-reward-money/id=22150/' rel='bookmark' title='Crowdsourcing Patent Research: $2 Million in Reward Money'>Crowdsourcing Patent Research: $2 Million in Reward Money</a><small>Article One Partners (AOP), the world’s largest patent research community, earlier today announced that the company has achieved a significant milestone — more than $2 million dollars in financial incentives to its global research community. This milestone comes 11 months to the day from when Article One announced that they had reached the $1 million award milestone. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/09/show-me-the-money-article-one-reaches-1-million-milestone/id=15712/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Head of Patents at MS &amp; IBM Joins Article One Partners</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/01/former-head-of-patents-at-ms-ibm-joins-article-one-partners/id=8681/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/01/former-head-of-patents-at-ms-ibm-joins-article-one-partners/id=8681/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article one partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=8681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Head of Patents at Microsoft and IBM, Marshall Phelps, Appointed to Article One Partners Board of Directors New York — February 1, 2010 — Article One Partners, the world’s largest patent validation firm, today announced the appointment of Marshall Phelps to its Board of Directors. The Director position with Article One is Phelps’ first [...]<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/26/lexisnexis-vp-joins-article-one-partners/id=24403/' rel='bookmark' title='LexisNexis VP Joins Article One Partners'>LexisNexis VP Joins Article One Partners</a><small>Vanderheyden joins AOP from the legal software and solutions corporation LexisNexis, where he was Vice President and Managing Director, Global IP Solutions. While at LexisNexis, he helped to develop TotalPatent, a leading patent research tool supported by the world’s largest patent database, and PatentOptimizer, a software tool that conducts word-level analysis of the legal integrity of a patent or application. Prior to LexisNexis, Vanderheyden served as Vice President of Marketing and Business Development for IP.com, a global patent and non-patent literature database, where he re-established the corporate brand, launched new products, and developed a patent for a new market opportunity....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/09/show-me-the-money-article-one-reaches-1-million-milestone/id=15712/' rel='bookmark' title='Show Me the Money! Article One Reaches $1 Million Milestone'>Show Me the Money! Article One Reaches $1 Million Milestone</a><small>On Monday, March 7, 2011, Article One Partners announced that it had surpassed the $1 Million milestone and has now distributed over $1 million in reward money to Advisors. It would seem that Article One Partners is growing and thriving, and that my initial reaction to the Article One Partners business model was incorrect. In fact, Article One Partners is likely just scratching the surface of its potential and demonstrating the power of coordinated crowd sourcing solutions....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/15/introducing-article-one-partners/id=26397/' rel='bookmark' title='Introducing Article One Partners'>Introducing Article One Partners</a><small>The other reason AOP has been so success is also eluded to in Phelps' quote above as well. Article One runs a "human network." When I asked Cheryl what made Article One so successful she immediately responded "our researchers." Indeed, their researchers are what makes the system work, and they have well over 1 million people registered as researchers and well over 23,000 active researchers who routinely submit prior art. These researchers are located all across the world, with roughly one-thrid in the United States, roughly another one-third in Europe, about 10% in Japan and the rest spread elsewhere around...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/02/01/former-head-of-patents-at-ms-ibm-joins-article-one-partners/id=8681/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
