<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; patent attorneys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/patent-attorneys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications &#38; Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Attorney Services After First To File. WHAT to File?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/25/patent-attorney-services-after-first-to-file-what-to-file/id=37406/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/25/patent-attorney-services-after-first-to-file-what-to-file/id=37406/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first to file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ip Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=37406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as most of society wrongly considers doctors as “gods”, many patent clients wrongly think that patent attorneys will help them achieve these business objectives simply by filing a patent. To be fair, patent attorneys are not being hired to study the client’s market, nor their competitive position within the market. They are not hired to develop the client’s internal IP budget, nor to help the company strategically develop an IP portfolio that could boost exit value. Such an engagement could be fraught with conflicts and confusion. Unless attorneys make clear the limited and narrow scope of their services, and unless and until clients become more IP-savvy, clients will continue to incorrectly assume that all is fine in their Patent La-La Land; nothing is further from the truth.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/08/patent-strategy-laying-the-foundation-for-business-success-2/id=23998/' rel='bookmark' title='Patent Strategy: Laying the Foundation for Business Success'>Patent Strategy: Laying the Foundation for Business Success</a><small>It is also critical for inventors and entrepreneurs to have a strategy to succeed, which seems simple enough, but is typically anything but simple for the creative types that are so good at inventing. The goal is not to create an invention that is cool, the goal is not to get a patent, the goal is almost universally to make money. The cool invention and patent are a means to the end, not the end in and of themselves. If you approach your patent activities appropriately you can lay the foundation of a business plan, at least insofar as the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/25/why-patent-attorneys-dont-work-on-contingency/id=22450/' rel='bookmark' title='Why Patent Attorneys Don&#8217;t Work on Contingency'>Why Patent Attorneys Don&#8217;t Work on Contingency</a><small>Having spent time as a litigator I know exactly what goes into taking a case on a contingency basis and you only take cases on a contingency when you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there WILL be money ACTUALLY recovered. That is why it is perfect for personal injury attorneys. They can tell with great certainty, if they are being honest, if money will be recovered. So you need to be 100% sure when you take the case that money will be obtained because as it turns out cases can and do take on a life of...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/11/need-patent-help-how-to-present-as-a-serious-inventor/id=17667/' rel='bookmark' title='Need Patent Help? How to Present as a Serious Inventor'>Need Patent Help? How to Present as a Serious Inventor</a><small>A representation relationship is just that, a relationship. Who you work with is an important decision and patent attorneys operate differently. At the end of the day what you should be looking for is someone who is competent and who you connect with on some level. In my opinion, when representation is most successful there is a good working relationship between the attorney and inventor, and that requires a certain comfort level and familiarity. Try and work with someone in a symbiotic way. No matter how good the inventor, the invention or the patent attorney, an “oil and water” characteristic...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/03/25/patent-attorney-services-after-first-to-file-what-to-file/id=37406/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooley Lands Chadbourne &amp; Parke&#8217;s Top IP &amp; Litigation Partners</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/20/cooley-lands-chadbourne-parkes-top-ip-litigation-partners/id=30442/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/20/cooley-lands-chadbourne-parkes-top-ip-litigation-partners/id=30442/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chadbourne Parke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Drayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kheit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Langer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Balber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Hanchuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson Sonsini Goodrich Rosati]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=30442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don't know what is going on at Chadbourne &#038; Parke, but I do know I know that Walt and John were both at Morgan &#038; Finnegan and left for Chadbourne over 7 years ago. Morgan &#038; Finnegan subsequently filed for bankruptcy ?several years later.   Over time the best attorneys were slowly bled from Morgan &#038; Finnegan, and virtually all of the rainmakers left.  There were obviously internal problems of one kind or another, likely of a structural nature compounded by top earners and rainmakers leaving. Now I see top level attorneys leaving Chadbourne &#038; Parke, one of them my friend who had enough sense to get out of Morgan &#038; Finnegan years before they went bankrupt. Could this be a sign of what may become over the next several years for Chadbourne &#038; Parke?<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/11/01/u-s-news-ranks-top-patent-copryight-trademark-firms/id=20135/' rel='bookmark' title='U.S. News Ranks Top Patent, Copryight &amp; Trademark Law Firms'>U.S. News Ranks Top Patent, Copryight &#038; Trademark Law Firms</a><small>Of course, these lists never give any love to the small or mid-size firms that provide high quality legal work at a reasonable cost to clients. But that is only one of the things that will raise some eyebrows. U.S. News included Howrey LLP in the top tier for intellectual property litigation and the firm dissolved on March 15, 2011, hardly 10 weeks into 2011. So how exactly does that qualify Howrey, a firm that no longer exists, for top tier ranking? That alone will cause some to scratch their heads and wonder exactly what U.S. New was thinking....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/15/clifton-mccann-joins-dc-offices-of-thompson-hine/id=28932/' rel='bookmark' title='Clifton McCann Joins DC Offices of Thompson Hine'>Clifton McCann Joins DC Offices of Thompson Hine</a><small>McCann, who is now a partner in the firm's Intellectual Property group, joins Thompson Hine in the firm's Washington, D.C. office, coming over to the firm from Venable LLP. The addition of McCann comes on the heels of other recent additions of what the firm refers to as "top tier laterals." McCann is a patent attorney with more than 30 years of experience, focuses his practice on the development and defense of patent rights in the chemical, biological, mechanical and software/business method arts. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/12/womble-carlyle-expands-ip-and-life-science-litigation-teams/id=29068/' rel='bookmark' title='Womble Carlyle Expands IP and Life Science Litigation Teams'>Womble Carlyle Expands IP and Life Science Litigation Teams</a><small>In October, Life Science litigators Mary Bourke, Mark Pino, Kristen Cramer, Dana Severance and Daniel Attaway joined the firm from Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP, an intellectual property law firm located in Delaware, which not lists 52 attorneys on their firm website. These laterals include three partners and two associates. Veteran IP litigators Barry Herman and Behrooz Shariati also joined the firm in June and July, respectively. According to the firm's website Womble Carlyle now has 547 attorneys and 89 attorneys operating within a broadly defined Intellectual Property practice group....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/20/cooley-lands-chadbourne-parkes-top-ip-litigation-partners/id=30442/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey I.D. Lewis Installed as AIPLA President for 2012-2013 Term</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/29/jeffrey-i-d-lewis-installed-as-aipla-president-for-2012-2013-term/id=29394/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/29/jeffrey-i-d-lewis-installed-as-aipla-president-for-2012-2013-term/id=29394/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AIPLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aipla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aipla annual meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american intellectual property law association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=29394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I am honored to have been elected President of an outstanding organization that plays a pivotal role in the global IP landscape,” Mr. Lewis said. “The coming year promises to be one of continuing change as the evolving global economy and ongoing advances in technology raise new challenges for the IP industry. I am excited to have the opportunity to work with AIPLA and its membership to address these issues and help to ensure that our intellectual property system remains strong and serves the best interests of its participants.”<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/12/27/albert-tramposch-uspto-aipla/id=21431/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO Administrator for Policy and External Affairs &#8211; Albert Tramposch &#8211; Rejoins AIPLA as Deputy Executive Director'>USPTO Administrator for Policy and External Affairs &#8211; Albert Tramposch &#8211; Rejoins AIPLA as Deputy Executive Director</a><small>The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) is pleased to announce that Albert Tramposch, Administrator for Policy and External Affairs at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), willresume his former post as AIPLA Deputy Executive Director for International and Regulatory Affairs, beginning January 16, 2012....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/04/15/aipla-applauds-approval-of-patent-reform-in-house-committee/id=16486/' rel='bookmark' title='AIPLA Applauds Approval of Patent Reform in House Committee'>AIPLA Applauds Approval of Patent Reform in House Committee</a><small>At an all-day session on April 14, members of the Committee gave serious consideration to a variety of amendments to the bill and concluded with an overwhelming, bi-partisan vote of 32-3 in support of the long-overdue improvements to the patent law. The Committee proceeding demonstrated the careful balancing of interests and the compromises necessary to address the concerns of the diverse stakeholders. While more work is yet to be done, the Committee's effort represents encouraging progress....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/17/exclusive-with-the-aipla-presidents-bill-barber-jeff-lewis/id=31518/' rel='bookmark' title='Exclusive with the AIPLA Presidents: Bill Barber &amp; Jeff Lewis'>Exclusive with the AIPLA Presidents: Bill Barber &#038; Jeff Lewis</a><small>Just ahead of the 2012 AIPLA Annual Meeting I had an opportunity to go on the record with Bill Barber, then President and now Immediate Past President of AIPLA. Also joining the discussion was Jeff Lewis, who was then President-elect and is now President of AIPLA. In part 1 of this 2 part interview we talk about the organization and how it operates, as well as the time commitment they invest.  We also discuss getting "buy-in" from their law partners and their families....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/29/jeffrey-i-d-lewis-installed-as-aipla-president-for-2012-2013-term/id=29394/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPTO Proposes Updated Professional Conduct Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/18/uspto-proposes-updated-professional-conduct-rules/id=29003/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/18/uspto-proposes-updated-professional-conduct-rules/id=29003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>U.S.P.T.O.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA model rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rulemaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=29003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This proposed rule package adopts most ABA provisions wholesale or with minor revisions and codifies many professional responsibility obligations that already apply to the practice of law. Specifically, the proposed rules will streamline practitioners’ professional responsibility obligations, bringing USPTO obligations in line with most practitioners’ state bar requirements. The package also proposes to eliminate the annual practitioner maintenance fee.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/04/uspto-updates-registration-examination-for-new-patent-practitioners/id=28516/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO Updates Registration Examination for New Patent Practitioners'>USPTO Updates Registration Examination for New Patent Practitioners</a><small>As part of a wider effort aimed at stakeholders fully benefitting from the sweeping reforms of the America Invents Act (AIA), the U.S. Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced today that it has updated a critical examination for applicants seeking to practice in patent cases before the Office. The USPTO anticipates making another update to the examination when the first-inventor-to-file provisions of the AIA become effective in March 2013....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/07/31/uspto-expands-trademark-law-school-pilot-program/id=26969/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO Expands Trademark Law School Pilot Program'>USPTO Expands Trademark Law School Pilot Program</a><small>The U.S. Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced the selection of nine additional law schools to join the Trademark Law School Clinic Certification Pilot Program this fall. The program allows law students to practice trademark law before the USPTO under the guidance of a faculty clinic supervisor....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/04/03/uspto-adopts-new-ethics-rules-based-on-aba-model-rules/id=38649/' rel='bookmark' title='USPTO Adopts New Ethics Rules Based on ABA Model Rules'>USPTO Adopts New Ethics Rules Based on ABA Model Rules</a><small>The Federal Register Notice explains that currently there are approximately 41,000 registered patent practitioners, with at least 75% of the roster of patent practitioners being attorneys who are admitted in one or more States. Given that the ABA Model Rules have been adopted by 49 states and the District of Columbia, nearly all of the attorneys registered to practice at the USPTO are already professionally governed by ethics rules modeled from the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Thus, this change should not be considered to be a substantive change to the rules that apply to patent attorneys.Indeed, the Federal...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/18/uspto-proposes-updated-professional-conduct-rules/id=29003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clifton McCann Joins DC Offices of Thompson Hine</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/15/clifton-mccann-joins-dc-offices-of-thompson-hine/id=28932/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/15/clifton-mccann-joins-dc-offices-of-thompson-hine/id=28932/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clifton McCann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=28932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McCann, who is now a partner in the firm's Intellectual Property group, joins Thompson Hine in the firm's Washington, D.C. office, coming over to the firm from Venable LLP. The addition of McCann comes on the heels of other recent additions of what the firm refers to as "top tier laterals."  McCann is a patent attorney with more than 30 years of experience, focuses his practice on the development and defense of patent rights in the chemical, biological, mechanical and software/business method arts. <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/16/stephen-kong-joins-stradling-yocca-in-santa-monica-office/id=30273/' rel='bookmark' title='Senior Sony PlayStation Attorney Stephen Kong Joins Stradling Yocca'>Senior Sony PlayStation Attorney Stephen Kong Joins Stradling Yocca</a><small>Prior to joining Stradling, Mr. Kong was Senior Corporate Counsel for Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC. While at Sony PlayStation, he was the lead attorney for the US R&D and Strategic Business Development Groups for the Sony entity responsible for Sony PlayStation matters in North and Latin America....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/20/cooley-lands-chadbourne-parkes-top-ip-litigation-partners/id=30442/' rel='bookmark' title='Cooley Lands Chadbourne &amp; Parke&#8217;s Top IP &amp; Litigation Partners'>Cooley Lands Chadbourne &#038; Parke&#8217;s Top IP &#038; Litigation Partners</a><small>I don't know what is going on at Chadbourne & Parke, but I do know I know that Walt and John were both at Morgan & Finnegan and left for Chadbourne over 7 years ago. Morgan & Finnegan subsequently filed for bankruptcy ?several years later. Over time the best attorneys were slowly bled from Morgan & Finnegan, and virtually all of the rainmakers left. There were obviously internal problems of one kind or another, likely of a structural nature compounded by top earners and rainmakers leaving. Now I see top level attorneys leaving Chadbourne & Parke, one of them my...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/08/3-new-intellectual-property-members-for-mcdonald-hopkins/id=28645/' rel='bookmark' title='3 New Intellectual Property Members for McDonald Hopkins'>3 New Intellectual Property Members for McDonald Hopkins</a><small>McDonald Hopkins LLC, a law firm with offices in Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus, Detroit, Miami, and West Palm Beach, just announced the election of three new intellectual property attorneys to the firm's membership. The intellectual property attorneys being elevated to Member at McDonald Hopkins are: Todd A. Benni, Joseph J. Crimaldi and Scott M. Slaby. ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/15/clifton-mccann-joins-dc-offices-of-thompson-hine/id=28932/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Community: Raising Autism Awareness</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/11/ip-community-raising-autism-awareness/id=24815/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/11/ip-community-raising-autism-awareness/id=24815/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Tulino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good deeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Tulino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tangential]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=24815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is important for employers to be open-minded when considering employing someone with autism or other disabilities.  Those who are open-minded will find employees who are diligent, hard-working, and who take extreme pride in their jobs. Services exist for employers who are open-minded to potentially hiring a person with autism, but are concerned with how to hire or train someone with autism.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/15/clifton-mccann-joins-dc-offices-of-thompson-hine/id=28932/' rel='bookmark' title='Clifton McCann Joins DC Offices of Thompson Hine'>Clifton McCann Joins DC Offices of Thompson Hine</a><small>McCann, who is now a partner in the firm's Intellectual Property group, joins Thompson Hine in the firm's Washington, D.C. office, coming over to the firm from Venable LLP. The addition of McCann comes on the heels of other recent additions of what the firm refers to as "top tier laterals." McCann is a patent attorney with more than 30 years of experience, focuses his practice on the development and defense of patent rights in the chemical, biological, mechanical and software/business method arts. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/16/stephen-kong-joins-stradling-yocca-in-santa-monica-office/id=30273/' rel='bookmark' title='Senior Sony PlayStation Attorney Stephen Kong Joins Stradling Yocca'>Senior Sony PlayStation Attorney Stephen Kong Joins Stradling Yocca</a><small>Prior to joining Stradling, Mr. Kong was Senior Corporate Counsel for Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC. While at Sony PlayStation, he was the lead attorney for the US R&D and Strategic Business Development Groups for the Sony entity responsible for Sony PlayStation matters in North and Latin America....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/20/cooley-lands-chadbourne-parkes-top-ip-litigation-partners/id=30442/' rel='bookmark' title='Cooley Lands Chadbourne &amp; Parke&#8217;s Top IP &amp; Litigation Partners'>Cooley Lands Chadbourne &#038; Parke&#8217;s Top IP &#038; Litigation Partners</a><small>I don't know what is going on at Chadbourne & Parke, but I do know I know that Walt and John were both at Morgan & Finnegan and left for Chadbourne over 7 years ago. Morgan & Finnegan subsequently filed for bankruptcy ?several years later. Over time the best attorneys were slowly bled from Morgan & Finnegan, and virtually all of the rainmakers left. There were obviously internal problems of one kind or another, likely of a structural nature compounded by top earners and rainmakers leaving. Now I see top level attorneys leaving Chadbourne & Parke, one of them my...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/11/ip-community-raising-autism-awareness/id=24815/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebration! Tuesday April 10 is Be Kind To Lawyers Day</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/10/celebration-tuesday-april-10-is-be-kind-to-lawyers-day/id=24008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/10/celebration-tuesday-april-10-is-be-kind-to-lawyers-day/id=24008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Renee C. Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renee Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[be nice to lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny lawyer jokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hit Your Stride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international be kind to lawyers day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer jokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[llc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national be kind to lawyers day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Hughes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=24008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, what is this International Be Kind To Lawyers Day?  I am so glad you asked!  Steve Hughes, a non-lawyer from St. Louis, has been working with attorneys for many years now through his consulting firm Hit Your Stride, LLC. Whenever Steve merely mentions that he works with lawyers, he is more often than not met with snide comments, jokes and scowls.  He hears things like, "Lawyers?  I bet that's a treat."  Or, "Lawyers?  You poor thing."  So he asked himself, “Is it too much to ask to be nice to lawyers for just one day?”  And in answer to his question, not to mention as a result of his playing defense counsel for an entire profession, the idea for National Be Kind To Lawyers Day was born.  <div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/celebration-april-13th-is-national-be-kind-to-lawyers-day/id=10123/' rel='bookmark' title='Celebration! April 13th is National Be Kind To Lawyers Day'>Celebration! April 13th is National Be Kind To Lawyers Day</a><small>Happy National Be Kind To Lawyers Day!  What, you&#8217;ve not heard of it before?  Is it too much to ask to be nice to lawyers for just one day???  That was the question Steve Hughes, Creator of NATIONAL BE KIND TO LAWYERS DAY and the author of  bekindtolawyers.com asked himself one day.  Steve, a non-lawyer from St. [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/10/27/pto-expands-pro-bono-patent-assistance-to-nations-inventors/id=29320/' rel='bookmark' title='PTO Expands Pro Bono Patent Assistance to Nation’s Inventors'>PTO Expands Pro Bono Patent Assistance to Nation’s Inventors</a><small>The U.S. Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced the start of two new regional pro bono patent programs in California and the District of Columbia—the result of the USPTO’s cooperative efforts with the California Lawyers for the Arts and the Federal Circuit Bar Association (FCBA)....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/02/26/bridging-the-innovation-gap-pro-bono-opportunities-for-intellectual-property-attorneys/id=35957/' rel='bookmark' title='Bridging the Innovation Gap: Pro Bono Opportunities for Intellectual Property Attorneys'>Bridging the Innovation Gap: Pro Bono Opportunities for Intellectual Property Attorneys</a><small>I ended my three-part article by recommending that members of the IP Bar should strive to volunteer more pro bono hours in order to help bridge the innovation gap. Encouragingly, I received some emails from IPWatchdog.com readers asking, “how can I help?” Well, after some research, here is a list of some organizations around the country seeking patent, trademark and copyright pro bono attorney volunteers....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/10/celebration-tuesday-april-10-is-be-kind-to-lawyers-day/id=24008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing a Patent Application Drafted by an Inventor</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/10/reviewing-a-patent-application-drafted-by-an-inventor/id=22550/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/10/reviewing-a-patent-application-drafted-by-an-inventor/id=22550/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Information for Inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent claim drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all of this in mind, like many others I tell inventors that if they are going to do it themselves they should consider getting a patent attorney to review their application before they file.  Having said that, it is unrealistic to believe that a patent attorney can review what you have done in 1 hour or less.  Furthermore, it is foolish to believe that an application reviewed for 1 hour or less will result in a work product that will be as good as if it were drafted by the patent attorney in the first place.  If you want to do it yourself and have a qualified, experienced patent attorney review your work you should budget at least 6 to 10 hours of their time to review everything, critique what you have done and provide feedback and guidance for you to continue to build upon.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/10/29/when-should-do-it-yourselfers-seek-patent-assistance/id=20068/' rel='bookmark' title='When Should a Do It Yourself Inventor Seek Patent Assistance?'>When Should a Do It Yourself Inventor Seek Patent Assistance?</a><small>It is certainly true that once you file a nonprovisional patent application your ability to make additions to the application has largely ceased. Even if you are filing a provisional patent application, while you could always file another provisional patent application to correct mistakes, the first filing is only as good as what is disclosed. Taking the first filed patent application seriously and making sure it has all the necessary disclosure is absolutely critical. Therefore, having a professional review your patent application before you file is definitely wise. The question, however, is when do you seek the assistance? Frequently many...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/10/23/beware-background-pitfalls-when-preparing-a-patent-application/id=19982/' rel='bookmark' title='Beware Background Pitfalls When Preparing a Patent Application'>Beware Background Pitfalls When Preparing a Patent Application</a><small>The best thing to do is explain why your invention solves problems and/or is important for the relevant consumer audience. In order to accomplish this you do not explain what else available to consumers and why it is inferior, missing functionality or missing parts. Remember, the focus of the application MUST be on your invention. It can be extremely helpful to create a comparison chart or write text comparing the prior art you know about with your invention, but this should be used by you or provided to your patent attorney or agent. It will be exceptionally helpful to have...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/08/20/patent-drafting-lessons-learning-from-the-grappling-dummy/id=18846/' rel='bookmark' title='Patent Drafting Lessons: Learning from the Grappling Dummy'>Patent Drafting Lessons: Learning from the Grappling Dummy</a><small>Such a long, detailed and narrow feature set may have been require to get a patent issued, but is the patent effort (i.e., time and cost) worth such a narrow set of claims? The answer can be a resounding YES, or a definite NO! It all depends upon what you want to do with the patent. One this is for certain though, if you add enough qualifiers and sufficiently narrow a claim you can get a patent on virtually anything, which is unfortunately a truth that invention promotion companies know all to well! In almost all circumstances the goal is...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/03/10/reviewing-a-patent-application-drafted-by-an-inventor/id=22550/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Patent Attorneys Don&#8217;t Work on Contingency</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/25/why-patent-attorneys-dont-work-on-contingency/id=22450/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/25/why-patent-attorneys-dont-work-on-contingency/id=22450/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Information for Inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contingency representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=22450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having spent time as a litigator I know exactly what goes into taking a case on a contingency basis and you only take cases on a contingency when you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there WILL be money ACTUALLY recovered.  That is why it is perfect for personal injury attorneys.  They can tell with great certainty, if they are being honest, if money will be recovered.  So you need to be 100% sure when you take the case that money will be obtained because as it turns out cases can and do take on a life of their own and even when you are 100% certain at the outset you make mistakes.  If you are not 100% certain at the beginning you pretty much never recover anything.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/04/07/5-odd-things-inventors-tell-patent-attorneys/id=16295/' rel='bookmark' title='Lessons: 5 Odd Things Inventors Tell Patent Attorneys'>Lessons: 5 Odd Things Inventors Tell Patent Attorneys</a><small>One of the problems created by true newbies, particularly those who have not done any reading or tried to at least bring themselves up to speed to some extent, is that they present in a way that makes established patent attorneys and law firms want to run and hide. Whether it is unrealistic expectations, wanting a confidentiality agreement signed because they want to be able to sue you if things go bad, or wanting representation on a contingency basis, these things scream PROBLEM to most patent attorneys, thereby foreclosing a possible representation relationship in many cases....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/01/09/a-better-mouse-trap-patents-and-the-road-to-riches/id=8293/' rel='bookmark' title='A Better Mouse Trap: Patents and the Road to Riches'>A Better Mouse Trap: Patents and the Road to Riches</a><small>To paraphrase the famous quote of Ralph Waldo Emerson, if you build a better mouse-trap the world will make a path to your door. Inventors and entrepreneurs frequently take this quote all too literally, thinking that if they make a better product theirs will sell and make them rich beyond their wildest dreams. There are, [...]...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/11/need-patent-help-how-to-present-as-a-serious-inventor/id=17667/' rel='bookmark' title='Need Patent Help? How to Present as a Serious Inventor'>Need Patent Help? How to Present as a Serious Inventor</a><small>A representation relationship is just that, a relationship. Who you work with is an important decision and patent attorneys operate differently. At the end of the day what you should be looking for is someone who is competent and who you connect with on some level. In my opinion, when representation is most successful there is a good working relationship between the attorney and inventor, and that requires a certain comfort level and familiarity. Try and work with someone in a symbiotic way. No matter how good the inventor, the invention or the patent attorney, an “oil and water” characteristic...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/25/why-patent-attorneys-dont-work-on-contingency/id=22450/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check: Compensation for Patent Practitioners</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/01/07/reality-check-compensation-for-patent-practitioners/id=21649/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/01/07/reality-check-compensation-for-patent-practitioners/id=21649/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Educational Information for Inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=21649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Patent Strategy I explained that a reasonable quote for an office action response is $2,000.  Certainly it can be more depending upon the technology, but if you were going to poll patent practitioners from patent attorneys to patent agents I suspect you would come out with something close to a $2,000 average.  This prompted one patent examiner to comment: "You said in this article that practitioners make $2,000 per response on average. How much do examiners make per response? Probably a fourth or a third of that. I mean I try to do the best job I can but do you really expect all examiners who get paid a fourth or a third of what you make to perform at the level that you do?”<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/25/why-patent-attorneys-dont-work-on-contingency/id=22450/' rel='bookmark' title='Why Patent Attorneys Don&#8217;t Work on Contingency'>Why Patent Attorneys Don&#8217;t Work on Contingency</a><small>Having spent time as a litigator I know exactly what goes into taking a case on a contingency basis and you only take cases on a contingency when you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there WILL be money ACTUALLY recovered. That is why it is perfect for personal injury attorneys. They can tell with great certainty, if they are being honest, if money will be recovered. So you need to be 100% sure when you take the case that money will be obtained because as it turns out cases can and do take on a life of...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/07/patent-application-costs-you-get-what-you-pay-for/id=14281/' rel='bookmark' title='Patent Application Costs: You Get What You Pay For'>Patent Application Costs: You Get What You Pay For</a><small>It takes time to prepare a detailed written disclosure that will support any number of claims, and there is just no way to rush it. Inventors and entrepreneurs intuitively know this, but they get lured into believing that what they get for $1,400 is just as good as what they would get if they paid $8,000, which is unrealistic of course. You cannot fall for what you want to hear when you deep down know it makes no sense. If you aren't convinced ask yourself this: when you were in school and you had to write a paper for a...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/01/job-opening-patent-agent-electrical-computer-physics/id=23685/' rel='bookmark' title='Job Opening: Patent Agent (Electrical / Computer / Physics)'>Job Opening: Patent Agent (Electrical / Computer / Physics)</a><small>The intellectual property group of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC is actively seeking an Electrical Patent Agent with a minimum of 3 years of experience to join the firm in its Alexandria, Virginia office. Candidates for this position should possess a degree in Electrical Engineering, Computer Science or Computer Engineering....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/01/07/reality-check-compensation-for-patent-practitioners/id=21649/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Common Misperceptions About Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/23/7-common-misperceptions-about-intellectual-property/id=19338/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/23/7-common-misperceptions-about-intellectual-property/id=19338/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Hutchens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beth hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=19338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an aside, and somewhat related to the boring concept, is the idea that intellectual property practitioners are all basement-dwelling nerds.  OK, maybe we’re a little nerdy in some ways, but I swear I do not live in a basement, my summer reading did not include the cheat guide to World of Warcraft, and I have NEVER been to Comicon.    So what if I have the blueprints to the Millennium Falcon on my office wall and my favorite TV show is “How it’s Made”? You gotta admit some of the stuff we get to do and see in our professional lives is pretty freaking cool.  The seediest infringement cases.  The bleedingest edge of technology.  The next rival to the power of McDonald’s logo or Coca-Cola trade secret.  I wear my nerd moniker proudly.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/28/protecting-your-intellectual-property-in-china/id=16030/' rel='bookmark' title='Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China'>Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China</a><small>The China Road Show is a series of two-day China IP events that the USPTO is hosting across the country to help educate businesses about the realities of piracy and counterfeiting—which cost the American economy approximately $250 billion annually. Day 1 is largely devoted to understanding the patent, trademark and copyright laws in China, as well as enforcement of those rights. Day 2 of the seminar will address § 337 Infringement Investigations by the International Trade Commission (ITC), the challenges presented by counterfeiting and piracy on the Internet and the development of global IP strategies even for small businesses....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/21/the-top-5-ip-mistakes-tech-startups-make/id=17068/' rel='bookmark' title='The Top 5 IP Mistakes Tech Startups Make'>The Top 5 IP Mistakes Tech Startups Make</a><small>One of the costliest mistakes a startup can make is mismanaging intellectual property rights. A company needs to not only manage its own IP rights, but also avoid those of third parties, including competitors. To be on the safe side, therefore, intellectual property management should include efficiently protecting the startup’s IP rights while also avoiding the IP rights of others....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/16/understanding-intellectual-property-basics/id=4914/' rel='bookmark' title='Understanding Intellectual Property Basics'>Understanding Intellectual Property Basics</a><small>Intellectual property is probably best thought of (at least in general terms) as creations of the mind that are given the legal rights often associated with real or personal property. The rights that are given are a function of statutory law (i.e., law created by the legislature). These statutes may be federal or state laws, [...]...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/09/23/7-common-misperceptions-about-intellectual-property/id=19338/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edison Nation Launches Phase 2 of $25 Million Innovation Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/edison-nation-launches-phase-2-of-25-million-innovation-fund/id=18258/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/edison-nation-launches-phase-2-of-25-million-innovation-fund/id=18258/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everyday edisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis foreman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=18258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis Foreman, the producer of the Emmy Award winning PBS television show Everyday Edisons and the publisher of Inventors Digest, announced in April 2011 that he was launching of a $25 million Innovation Fund. Phase 1 of the search for inventions for the Fund to invest in was completed in mid-June 2011.  Phase 2 of the search for inventions and ideas has just begun and will run through Monday, September 12th, 2011.  He tells me that the Fund is off to a great start and has received some very innovative technologies as part of the first wave.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/09/attention-patent-attorneys-25-million-available-for-inventors/id=16850/' rel='bookmark' title='Attention Patent Attorneys, $25 Million Available for Inventors'>Attention Patent Attorneys, $25 Million Available for Inventors</a><small>To help what might be the best ideas and inventions percolate to the top Foreman has created what he refers to as a "Patent Attorney Referral Program." This program is designed to benefit patent attorneys and patent agents whose clients submit innovative ideas and concepts. This isn't one of those unethical referral programs though, so no worries there. If a client of a patent attorney or patent agent is selected and accepts the offer of assistance from the Innovation Fund then the patent attorney or patent agent representing that inventor will be retained by the Innovation Fund to provide the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/08/louis-foreman-supports-patent-reform/id=10050/' rel='bookmark' title='Everyday Edisons Producer &amp; Inventors Digest Publisher, Louis Foreman, Supports Patent Reform'>Everyday Edisons Producer &#038; Inventors Digest Publisher, Louis Foreman, Supports Patent Reform</a><small>Louis Foreman sent the letter reproduced below to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who is Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. As his letter explains, Foreman supports patent reform because "leaving the current system alone is not an opinion, nor does it benefit anyone." Foreman believes the patent reform pending is a "significant improvement" because, among other things, it will lower fees for micro-entities and lead to because it will "ultimately result in a stronger patent making it easier for independent inventors and small businesses to attract start-up capital. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/03/inventor-digest-publisher-louis-foreman-cited-in-patent-reform-debate-in-us-senate/id=15656/' rel='bookmark' title='Inventors Digest Publisher, Louis Foreman, Cited in Patent Reform Debate in US Senate'>Inventors Digest Publisher, Louis Foreman, Cited in Patent Reform Debate in US Senate</a><small>As the debate in the Senate starts to wind down and moves to the House of Representatives, whether you are pro-reform or against reform, get involved and participate. Taking the time to be engaged can go a long way. In listening to the debate in the Senate over the past 4 days it is clear to me that Senators are listening to those on both sides who engage in thoughtful debate. While I am often cynical about government, it has been refreshing to watch. Painful at times, but nice to see that ordinary citizens can make a difference....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/edison-nation-launches-phase-2-of-25-million-innovation-fund/id=18258/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Need Patent Help? How to Present as a Serious Inventor</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/11/need-patent-help-how-to-present-as-a-serious-inventor/id=17667/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/11/need-patent-help-how-to-present-as-a-serious-inventor/id=17667/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Information for Inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=17667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A representation relationship is just that, a relationship. Who you work with is an important decision and patent attorneys operate differently. At the end of the day what you should be looking for is someone who is competent and who you connect with on some level. In my opinion, when representation is most successful there is a good working relationship between the attorney and inventor, and that requires a certain comfort level and familiarity. Try and work with someone in a symbiotic way. No matter how good the inventor, the invention or the patent attorney, an “oil and water” characteristic to the relationship cannot result in the best work product or the most beneficial ultimate outcome.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/09/attention-patent-attorneys-25-million-available-for-inventors/id=16850/' rel='bookmark' title='Attention Patent Attorneys, $25 Million Available for Inventors'>Attention Patent Attorneys, $25 Million Available for Inventors</a><small>To help what might be the best ideas and inventions percolate to the top Foreman has created what he refers to as a "Patent Attorney Referral Program." This program is designed to benefit patent attorneys and patent agents whose clients submit innovative ideas and concepts. This isn't one of those unethical referral programs though, so no worries there. If a client of a patent attorney or patent agent is selected and accepts the offer of assistance from the Innovation Fund then the patent attorney or patent agent representing that inventor will be retained by the Innovation Fund to provide the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/02/25/why-patent-attorneys-dont-work-on-contingency/id=22450/' rel='bookmark' title='Why Patent Attorneys Don&#8217;t Work on Contingency'>Why Patent Attorneys Don&#8217;t Work on Contingency</a><small>Having spent time as a litigator I know exactly what goes into taking a case on a contingency basis and you only take cases on a contingency when you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there WILL be money ACTUALLY recovered. That is why it is perfect for personal injury attorneys. They can tell with great certainty, if they are being honest, if money will be recovered. So you need to be 100% sure when you take the case that money will be obtained because as it turns out cases can and do take on a life of...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/edison-nation-launches-phase-2-of-25-million-innovation-fund/id=18258/' rel='bookmark' title='Edison Nation Launches Phase 2 of $25 Million Innovation Fund'>Edison Nation Launches Phase 2 of $25 Million Innovation Fund</a><small>Louis Foreman, the producer of the Emmy Award winning PBS television show Everyday Edisons and the publisher of Inventors Digest, announced in April 2011 that he was launching of a $25 million Innovation Fund. Phase 1 of the search for inventions for the Fund to invest in was completed in mid-June 2011. Phase 2 of the search for inventions and ideas has just begun and will run through Monday, September 12th, 2011. He tells me that the Fund is off to a great start and has received some very innovative technologies as part of the first wave....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/11/need-patent-help-how-to-present-as-a-serious-inventor/id=17667/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What To Do If You Are Sued for Patent Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/02/what-to-do-sued-for-patent-infringement/id=17538/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/02/what-to-do-sued-for-patent-infringement/id=17538/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent troll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=17538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the gathering storm, some businesses would prefer to pretend that patent infringement is not a problem for them and they won't be sued.  The graph below shows that since 1980 the number of patent lawsuits filed has only gone up, with a record number (3,301) being filed in 2010.  Add the frequency of the "dime a dozen" threatening letters sent by those seeking to extract licensing payments to the number of lawsuits filed and you can readily see that patent infringement litigation, and the associated threats thereof, are a growth industry.  Here is what you need to know when you get sued or get that threatening letter.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/24/extortion-patent-style-small-business-in-the-troll-crosshairs/id=17425/' rel='bookmark' title='Extortion Patent Style: Small Business in the Troll Crosshairs'>Extortion Patent Style: Small Business in the Troll Crosshairs</a><small>Between 1995 and 2009 the overall median patent litigation damage award was $5.2 million, but between 2002-2009 there was a huge discrepancy between the average damage award for practicing entities versus non-practicing entities. The median award for non-practicing entities was $12.9 million, while the median award for practicing entities lagged far behind at $3.9 million. No wonder there is ever increasing activities by those the Federal Trade Commission refers to as "patent assertion entities," which seems to be yet another sanitized name for patent troll....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/28/the-problem-with-patent-trolls/id=18345/' rel='bookmark' title='The Problem with Patent Trolls'>The Problem with Patent Trolls</a><small>To me a patent troll is not just someone who has acquired a patent for purpose of licensing or bringing a lawsuit, but rather one who is engaging in some kind of unfair business practice. The telltale sign of a patent troll is one who is abusing the patent right in order to shake down a defendant for payment. This type of behavior is typically exhibited by non-practicing entities who are not innovators, but rather acquire patent rights. However, the act of bringing specious claims to provoke a settlement would, in my opinion, be just as bad if brought by...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/18/definition-patent-troll/id=11700/' rel='bookmark' title='In Search Of a Definition for the term &#8220;Patent Troll&#8221;'>In Search Of a Definition for the term &#8220;Patent Troll&#8221;</a><small>The reality is that the term patent troll seems to be more in the eye of the beholder than anything else. So a patent troll is whoever is suing you because you must be correct and some evil wrong-doer is holding you hostage. Never mind that you are actually infringing and you are the real wrong-doer (i.e., tortfeasor). What is needed is a working definition for the term patent troll so that this nonsense can stop once and for all, and so the uninformed in the media can be spared the embarrassment of their own cluelessness. So lets take a...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/02/what-to-do-sued-for-patent-infringement/id=17538/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention Patent Attorneys, $25 Million Available for Inventors</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/09/attention-patent-attorneys-25-million-available-for-inventors/id=16850/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/09/attention-patent-attorneys-25-million-available-for-inventors/id=16850/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 19:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews & Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enventys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everyday edisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent inventors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis foreman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=16850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To help what might be the best ideas and inventions percolate to the top Foreman has created what he refers to as a "Patent Attorney Referral Program."  This program is designed to benefit patent attorneys and patent agents whose clients submit innovative ideas and concepts. This isn't one of those unethical referral programs though, so no worries there.  If a client of a patent attorney or patent agent is selected and accepts the offer of assistance from the Innovation Fund then the patent attorney or patent agent representing that inventor will be retained by the Innovation Fund to provide the legal services required to pursue patent rights.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/edison-nation-launches-phase-2-of-25-million-innovation-fund/id=18258/' rel='bookmark' title='Edison Nation Launches Phase 2 of $25 Million Innovation Fund'>Edison Nation Launches Phase 2 of $25 Million Innovation Fund</a><small>Louis Foreman, the producer of the Emmy Award winning PBS television show Everyday Edisons and the publisher of Inventors Digest, announced in April 2011 that he was launching of a $25 million Innovation Fund. Phase 1 of the search for inventions for the Fund to invest in was completed in mid-June 2011. Phase 2 of the search for inventions and ideas has just begun and will run through Monday, September 12th, 2011. He tells me that the Fund is off to a great start and has received some very innovative technologies as part of the first wave....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/03/inventor-digest-publisher-louis-foreman-cited-in-patent-reform-debate-in-us-senate/id=15656/' rel='bookmark' title='Inventors Digest Publisher, Louis Foreman, Cited in Patent Reform Debate in US Senate'>Inventors Digest Publisher, Louis Foreman, Cited in Patent Reform Debate in US Senate</a><small>As the debate in the Senate starts to wind down and moves to the House of Representatives, whether you are pro-reform or against reform, get involved and participate. Taking the time to be engaged can go a long way. In listening to the debate in the Senate over the past 4 days it is clear to me that Senators are listening to those on both sides who engage in thoughtful debate. While I am often cynical about government, it has been refreshing to watch. Painful at times, but nice to see that ordinary citizens can make a difference....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/11/need-patent-help-how-to-present-as-a-serious-inventor/id=17667/' rel='bookmark' title='Need Patent Help? How to Present as a Serious Inventor'>Need Patent Help? How to Present as a Serious Inventor</a><small>A representation relationship is just that, a relationship. Who you work with is an important decision and patent attorneys operate differently. At the end of the day what you should be looking for is someone who is competent and who you connect with on some level. In my opinion, when representation is most successful there is a good working relationship between the attorney and inventor, and that requires a certain comfort level and familiarity. Try and work with someone in a symbiotic way. No matter how good the inventor, the invention or the patent attorney, an “oil and water” characteristic...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/05/09/attention-patent-attorneys-25-million-available-for-inventors/id=16850/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
