http://www.ipwatchdog.com Patents, Software Patents, Patent Applications & Patent Law Tue, 21 May 2013 18:04:03 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/09/21/inventing-101-protecting-your-invention-when-you-need-help/id=28156/ http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/09/21/inventing-101-protecting-your-invention-when-you-need-help/id=28156/#comments Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:01:15 +0000 Gene Quinn http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=28156 Related posts:

1. Inventing 101: Protecting Your Invention When You Need HelpSo how do you decide whether you have a mere idea or a conception that is on the road to a full blown invention? That is a difficult question to answer and one that has few, if any, bright line rules or useful generalizations. What I would say, however, is this: If you can sketch out the invention on paper (in the case of a device) or list the steps (in the case of a process) you likely have something that is tending toward the invention side of the idea-invention continuum. When you are at the point where you can...
2. Protecting Your Invention When You Need HelpAt what point does an idea take enough form to be considered an invention that can be protected? First, it is completely correct to say that ideas cannot be patented. Having said that, it is equally correct to say that every invention starts with an idea. The patent laws in the United States differentiate between a mere idea and conception. When you have a conception you have an invention, and the easiest way to define the term “conception” in lay terms is as an idea plus some knowledge regarding how to bring the idea into being, whether your idea is...
3. Applying for a Patent in the U.S.A patent is a proprietary right granted by the United States federal government to an inventor who files a patent application with the United States Patent Office. Therefore, unlike copyright and trademark protection, patent protection will only exist upon the issuance of a patent, which requires you to file a patent application. You absolutely must file a patent application and have that application mature into an issued patent in order to obtain exclusive rights to your invention....

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. ]]> http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/09/21/inventing-101-protecting-your-invention-when-you-need-help/id=28156/feed/ 2 http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/09/change-derviation-may-feel-a-lot-like-interference-practice/id=24020/ http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/09/change-derviation-may-feel-a-lot-like-interference-practice/id=24020/#comments Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:18:22 +0000 Gene Quinn http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=24020 Related posts:

1. First Inventor to File: USPTO Derivation Proceedings Go FinalSection 42.405(c) provides that a derivation is not sufficiently shown unless it is supported by substantial evidence. This includes at least one affidavit addressing communication and lack of authorization. Further, the showing of communication must be corroborated. One open practical question is whether derivation proceedings will be at all useful. How will the inventor alleging derivation be in possession of sufficient evidence to demonstrate communication and lack of authorization? The best evidence of each will be in the hands of the party who is the alleged deriver, not the inventor claiming to be the source of the invention. Moreover, proving...
2. Patent Truth and Consequence: File First Even in the U.S.The date of invention relates to your conception. This is true whether you are engaging in an interference proceeding seeking to obtain a claim instead of another who is also seeking the claim, or you are attempting to demonstrate that you can get behind a reference used by an examiner because you have an earlier date of invention. The hallmark of a first to invent system is that those who file second can obtain a patent under very strictly limited scenarios. A byproduct of a first to invent system is that if the examiner finds prior art you can "swear...
3. Reform Doing Away with Interference Proceedings & First to InventOne of the proposals in the pending patent reform legislation is a change from first to invent to a first to file system. The trouble is that an interference proceeding, the proceeding that would take place to determine who is entitled to receive the patent between the alleged first to invent and the first to file, costs about $600,000. Not many independent inventors or small businesses are going to be able to foot that bill for sure. Nevertheless, I thought it might be good to take a look at this thing called an interference proceeding, which if patent reform is...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. ]]> http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/04/09/change-derviation-may-feel-a-lot-like-interference-practice/id=24020/feed/ 2 http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/20/patent-truth-and-consequence-file-first-even-in-the-u-s/id=15814/ http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/20/patent-truth-and-consequence-file-first-even-in-the-u-s/id=15814/#comments Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:56:06 +0000 Gene Quinn http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=15814 Related posts:

1. Reform Doing Away with Interference Proceedings & First to InventOne of the proposals in the pending patent reform legislation is a change from first to invent to a first to file system. The trouble is that an interference proceeding, the proceeding that would take place to determine who is entitled to receive the patent between the alleged first to invent and the first to file, costs about $600,000. Not many independent inventors or small businesses are going to be able to foot that bill for sure. Nevertheless, I thought it might be good to take a look at this thing called an interference proceeding, which if patent reform is...
2. Change? Derviation May Feel a Lot Like Interference PracticeHow this will philosophically change things remains unclear because the America Invents Act requires that the petition filed to institute a derivation proceeding demonstrate that the claimed invention in the subject application or patent was derived from an inventor named in the petitioner’s application without authorization. The Patent Office has also recognized the similarity between derivation proceedings and interference practice, saying: "Petitions to institute derivation proceedings, while distinct from interference practice, raise similar issues to those that may be raised in interferences in a motion for judgment on priority of invention. Currently, motions for judgment on priority of invention, including...
3. Federal Circuit: Foreign Application Not Priority in Interference When it Only “Envisions” InventionLast week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Goeddel v. Sugano, which might be one of a dying breed should patent reform actually pass. The case dealt with an appeal from an interference proceeding where the Board awarded priority based on a Japanese application. The Federal Circuit, per Judge Newman, explained that it was inappropriate to say that the Japanese application demonstrated a constructive reduction to practice because the application merely would allow the skilled reader to "envision" the invention covered in the interference count. If patent reform passes (and yes that...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. ]]> http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/20/patent-truth-and-consequence-file-first-even-in-the-u-s/id=15814/feed/ 19 http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/12/16/invention-to-patent-the-pitfalls-perils-and-process/id=13727/ http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/12/16/invention-to-patent-the-pitfalls-perils-and-process/id=13727/#comments Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:30:17 +0000 Gene Quinn http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=13727 Related posts:

1. The Top 5 Mistakes Inventors MakeThe first step toward commercializing an invention and making money from it is typically to pursue the patent path.  On the road to a patent there are many mistakes that inventors can make unwittingly, some of which will ultimately make it impossible to obtain a patent. With that in mind, here is a list of the top 5 mistakes inventors make, followed by discussion of what you should do to move your project forward in an appropriate and responsible way....
2. Protecting Your Invention When You Need HelpAt what point does an idea take enough form to be considered an invention that can be protected? First, it is completely correct to say that ideas cannot be patented. Having said that, it is equally correct to say that every invention starts with an idea. The patent laws in the United States differentiate between a mere idea and conception. When you have a conception you have an invention, and the easiest way to define the term “conception” in lay terms is as an idea plus some knowledge regarding how to bring the idea into being, whether your idea is...
3. A Beginner’s Guide to Patents and the Patent ProcessEven when hiring a patent attorney inventors still need to be engaged in order to give the patent attorney the best information available about the invention. This seems simple enough, but so many inventors fail to understand what information is important and why it is necessary.  If you don't understand that "why" you will you will almost never be able to provide all the information necessary....

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. ]]> http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/12/16/invention-to-patent-the-pitfalls-perils-and-process/id=13727/feed/ 2 http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/09/13/interference-appeal-federal-circuit-overrules-board-on-constructive-reduction-to-practice/id=12469/ http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/09/13/interference-appeal-federal-circuit-overrules-board-on-constructive-reduction-to-practice/id=12469/#comments Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:58:13 +0000 Gene Quinn http://ipwatchdog.com/?p=12469 Related posts:

1. Patent Truth and Consequence: File First Even in the U.S.The date of invention relates to your conception. This is true whether you are engaging in an interference proceeding seeking to obtain a claim instead of another who is also seeking the claim, or you are attempting to demonstrate that you can get behind a reference used by an examiner because you have an earlier date of invention. The hallmark of a first to invent system is that those who file second can obtain a patent under very strictly limited scenarios. A byproduct of a first to invent system is that if the examiner finds prior art you can "swear...
2. Reform Doing Away with Interference Proceedings & First to InventOne of the proposals in the pending patent reform legislation is a change from first to invent to a first to file system. The trouble is that an interference proceeding, the proceeding that would take place to determine who is entitled to receive the patent between the alleged first to invent and the first to file, costs about $600,000. Not many independent inventors or small businesses are going to be able to foot that bill for sure. Nevertheless, I thought it might be good to take a look at this thing called an interference proceeding, which if patent reform is...
3. Change? Derviation May Feel a Lot Like Interference PracticeHow this will philosophically change things remains unclear because the America Invents Act requires that the petition filed to institute a derivation proceeding demonstrate that the claimed invention in the subject application or patent was derived from an inventor named in the petitioner’s application without authorization. The Patent Office has also recognized the similarity between derivation proceedings and interference practice, saying: "Petitions to institute derivation proceedings, while distinct from interference practice, raise similar issues to those that may be raised in interferences in a motion for judgment on priority of invention. Currently, motions for judgment on priority of invention, including...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. ]]> http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2010/09/13/interference-appeal-federal-circuit-overrules-board-on-constructive-reduction-to-practice/id=12469/feed/ 4