Reexamination vs. IPR: Which is Better for Patent Owners?

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we discuss whether patent owners are better off facing post-grant challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). PTAB practitioners Matt Phillips and Kevin Greenleaf joined me for about how patent owners and challengers should be strategically thinking about the shifting post-grant environment at the USPTO. Our conversation highlights the growing reality that post-grant practice is no longer defined solely by inter partes review (IPR), but that ex parte reexamination has seen a resurgence in popularity, which requires careful evaluating timing, procedural dynamics, cost, and institutional realities. Fundamentally we attempt to answer the question of whether patent owners are better off in reexamination, or whether they are better off with IPR at the PTAB.

What the Second Circuit Got Wrong About Rule 4(f) and the Hague Convention

In December 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that service of two China-based defendants by email violated the Convention on Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters, Nov. 15, 1965, 20 U.S.T. 361, T.I.A.S. No. 6638, also known as the “Hague Convention,” and therefore was not permitted under Rule 4(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Smart Study Co. v. Shenzhenshixindajixieyouxiangongsi, U.S. App. LEXIS 33039, at *1 (2d Cir. Dec. 18, 2025).   While the Second Circuit looked at whether the Hague Convention explicitly identifies email as a permitted method of service, the proper question is whether the Hague Convention prohibits service by email.

International Rule Changes, Complex Licensing Schemes Lead to Last-Minute Copyright Clearance Issues at 2026 Milan Cortina Olympics

In 1924, several changes were wrought to the format of the Olympic Games that remain permanent features more than a century later as the 2026 Winter Olympics take place in Milan Cortina. That year featured the first lodging for athletes in what would become the Olympic Village, the first radio broadcasts of live Olympic events, and the first edition of the Winter Olympics as a separate event for the summer games. Figure skating events were among the games introduced at the 1924 Winter Olympics in Chamonix, France, and a century later, the international competition has been roiled by a series of copyright authorization issues leaving some skaters scrambling to change their routine and avoid infringement liability.

Copyright Office Report: Copyright Claims Board a Success, But Statutory Changes Needed for Efficiency

The U.S. Copyright Office on Friday released its report pursuant to the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement (CASE) Act, finding that the Copyright Claims Board (CCB) is largely successful but that there is “room for improvement in various respects.” The Copyright Claims Board (CCB), established by the December 2020 CASE Act, is an alternative to federal court where copyright owners can bring suits before a tribunal at the Copyright Office.

AI and Copyright: How Lessons from Litigation Can Pave the Way to Licensing

As the AI revolution accelerates and continues to reshape traditional business models, it has triggered a cascade of new legal, regulatory and policy challenges. At the forefront of these emerging issues are a growing number of high-stakes legal battles between content creators and major Generative AI (GenAI) companies behind large language models (LLMs). This article examines key legal themes and critical questions arising from recent developments at the intersection of AI and Copyright law.

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, February 13: CAFC Says NHK-Fintiv is General Policy Statement; Second Circuit Adopts Rule on Waiver of DMCA Safe Harbor; and Daren Tang Nominated for Second Term as WIPO Director

This week in Other Barks & Bites: the U.S. Copyright Office issues a three-year study on small claims filed at the Copyright Claims Board; Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick publicly retreats from a proposed value-based tax on U.S. patent grants; the Federal Circuit issues several precedential decisions including one nixing Apple’s appeal of the NHK-Fintiv framework for discretionary denials of IPR proceedings; and more.

Knobbe Martens is Seeking a Patent Scientist

Knobbe Martens is seeking a Patent Scientist in Computer Science/Electrical Engineering. Knobbe Martens provides an opportunity for engineers and scientists to further their professional growth and career development in exciting, challenging ways. Put your technical degree to work on issues involving science, technology, and the law. Candidates will assist with the successful procurement of patent protection for innovative technologies, evaluate the designs of new products, and assist with the evaluation of competitor products.

Subscribe to IPWatchdog

This is the best way to stay informed. We send a daily roundup of our latest news, press releases, and events.

Get Email Updates