IPWatchdog.com is in the process of transitioning to a newer version of our website. Please be patient with us while we work out all the kinks.

The History of Software Patents

This article was updated and republished on November 30, 2014. You can find the new, updated version of the article at:

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2014/11/30/the-history-of-software-patents-in-the-united-states/id=52256/

 

 

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Join the Discussion

4 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for breadcrumbs]
    breadcrumbs
    January 25, 2009 10:06 pm

    Gene,

    It may be of interest to specifically highlight differences in the history you present with the history presented by our friends at Groklaw (specifically, Groklaw links to the following software history article: http://www.bitlaw.com/software-patent/history.html). Surprisingly (or not), the article seems a little thin on the actual development of legal thought, for example, entirely omitting Alappat.

  • [Avatar for Gene Quinn]
    Gene Quinn
    January 25, 2009 11:33 pm

    breadcrumbs-

    Thanks for the link. I will take a look at it as I write the follow on pieces. I have a lot already written and ready to launch this week. I can assure you that my Federal Circuit article will definitely mention Alappat. In my opinion that is one of the most important cases in the development. That is the case that ultimately made it possible for software to come out of the closet and actually be treated like… well… software.

    Thanks for reading.

    -Gene

  • [Avatar for 6]
    6
    March 12, 2009 12:06 am

    Gene man what happened to the second posting?

  • [Avatar for JamesD]
    JamesD
    June 11, 2009 01:46 pm

    Thanks for the useful info. It’s so interesting