USPTO Not Laying Off Employees

By Gene Quinn
February 25, 2009

Earlier today I was contacted by the Wall Street Journal asking whether I had heard about the United States Patent and Trademark Office laying off employees in such a way that it would create problems for the Office with respect to keeping up with the growing backlog of patent applications.  From what I can tell this rumor was started by Greg Aharonian, and now is trickling down through various sources and major media are starting to look into the situation to see if there is any truth to the rumor.  Thankfully, the Wall Street Journal was engaging in good reporting practices, which seems to be a dying art these days in many popular press circles.  I can report that based on my investigation there is no truth to the rumor that the PTO will be laying off or furloughing employees.

Immediately upon learning of the rumor that the Patent Office would be sending patent examiners packing I started contacting my sources and was told that there is no truth to this rumor whatsoever.  I was reminded that less than two weeks ago John Doll, the Acting Director of the USPTO announced at the deferred examination roundtable that hiring of new examiners would continue into the future, as has been the plan all along. 

I have also been in touch with Jennifer Rankin Bryne, spokeswoman for the the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  She confirmed that there is no truth to this layoff or furlough rumor.  It seems that the number of new examiners that will be hired this year has not been fully determined, but that hiring will continue.  Like many I have thought for a long time that hiring 1,200 new examiners a year was to many to adequately train, so if the Patent Office does hire less but can bring them up to speed quicker, with better training, then that would be a positive thing in my mind.

I will keep my eyes and ears open on this one, but from what I can tell from both direct contacts with the Patent Office and from those in the know who I trust this rumor is simply false.


About the Author

Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc.
US Patent Attorney (Reg. No. 44,294)

B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Rutgers University
J.D., Franklin Pierce Law Center
L.L.M. in Intellectual Property, Franklin Pierce Law Center
Send me an e-mail
View Gene Quinn's profile on LinkedIn

Gene is a US Patent Attorney, Law Professor and the founder of IPWatchdog.com. He teaches patent bar review courses and is a member of the Board of Directors of the United Inventors Association. Gene has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the LA Times, CNN Money and various other newspapers and magazines worldwide

The Author

Gene Quinn

Gene Quinn is a Patent Attorney and Editor and President & CEO ofIPWatchdog, Inc.. Gene founded IPWatchdog.com in 1999. Gene is also a principal lecturer in the PLI Patent Bar Review Course and Of Counsel to the law firm of Berenato & White, LLC. Gene’s specialty is in the area of strategic patent consulting, patent application drafting and patent prosecution. He consults with attorneys facing peculiar procedural issues at the Patent Office, advises investors and executives on patent law changes and pending litigation matters, and works with start-up businesses throughout the United States and around the world, primarily dealing with software and computer related innovations. is admitted to practice law in New Hampshire, is a Registered Patent Attorney and is also admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. CLICK HERE to send Gene a message.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 1 Comment comments.

  1. T February 25, 2009 6:00 pm

    Well….not until applicants get fed up with all the 101 rejections and new filings drop to a trickle….say in a year or so…