What the 2016 presidential candidates are saying about H-1B visas

Donald Trump

Donald Trump. Photo by Marc Nozell. Licensed CC BY-SA 2.0.

Action on immigration reform has taken on new urgency in recent months due in part by the enormous backlog of foreign workers seeking H-1B visas for specialty occupations. In late December, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security released a 181-page proposal of new rules that increase the maximum period of time that a worker can stay in the U.S. on an H-1B visa. Those rules would also allow visa workers to change jobs without losing their spot in line for a green card.

The U.S. Senate has also shown some interest in making fixes to the H-1B visa program. Last November, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) introduced bipartisan legislation that would introduce stricter provisions on how companies are able to use H-1B visas. In late February, the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary held a hearing where the H-1B visa program came under fire for cases of alleged abuse by employers and how the visa program has been used to lay off American workers.

In the current presidential election cycle, the H-1B visa has been the subject of discussion among candidates for the U.S. presidency on both sides of the political spectrum.

On the Republican side, front-runner Donald Trump, whose inability to be stopped by his own rhetoric has proven to be a hallmark of his campaign, has said himself that he is “changing” on this issue, at least where skilled talent is concerned. The 2016 race’s most strident voice on the immigration debate had odd encounter with a reasoned approach to a policy topic in early March, citing a need to have “talented people” in America. And yet, a week after those statements, Trump was quoted in a Republican debate as having said that he shouldn’t have been allowed to use the H-1B program as a businessman because of its effects on American workers. The immigration reform website on Trump’s official campaign page, which still calls for a wall along the country’s southern border, supports an increased prevailing wage for H-1B workers and an explicit requirement to hire Americans first. Thus, as with other issues, Trump has been on both sides of the H-1B visa issue, which makes it difficult to know what he really believes and what policy might become during a Trump Administration.

Meanwhile, the campaign website of Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) lays out a number of immigration reform measures that would affect the H-1B program. Cruz supports a 180-day suspension of all H-1B visa issuances to audit abuse allegations as well as advanced degree requirements and a “layoff cool-off” period that would prohibit a company from laying off a worker within a year or two of using the visa program. Interestingly, these stricter measures regarding the H-1B visa don’t reflect Cruz’s stance on the subject from just several years ago. Back in 2013, when he supported an amendment to an immigration bill to increase annual H-1B visa permits five-fold to 325,000 with increased fees for companies in some cases. This bill wasn’t passed by the House. Perhaps Cruz’s position has evolved, perhaps it has changed, your view largely will depend on whether you support Senator Cruz or whether you support some other candidate.

Ohio Governor John Kasich, the other remaining Republican candidate, does not have any information about immigration on his campaign website, and nothing we can find relating to the H-1B visa program. Kasich seems to be staking his long-shot bid for the White House around fiscal responsibility, growing the economy, balancing the budget, and being a moderate alternative to Trump and Kasich.

On the Democratic side, the debate is quieter and falls much more easily within identifiable party lines. H-1B visas aren’t mentioned in Hillary Clinton’s official campaign site, but she is quoted in a 2007 speech in India where she supported an increased H-1B visa cap. Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) has called for a substantial prevailing wage increase for H-1B workers. The immigration reform page on Sanders’ official campaign site also calls for ending the “economic exploitation of immigrant workers,” noting that workers should not be bound to a certain employer and that their family members should also be allowed to work.


Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Join the Discussion

2 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for Silence Dogood]
    Silence Dogood
    March 23, 2016 04:49 pm

    This is not an immigration comparable to the past, these non-immigrants are being brought over for the single purpose of taking Americans jobs at lower wages. Now visa expansion is the goal of our bought politicians and the corporate lobby; even the trade agreements (TPP) are loaded with language meant to expand foreign guest workers taking what’s left of American jobs.

    Hiring only foreign workers, even though an intermediary, is discrimination at its worst. With H-1B visa, diversity doesn’t apply: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2956584/it-outsourcing/with-h-1b-visa-diversity-doesnt-apply.html

    Americans are losing their jobs to mostly visa holding Indians across this country, entire apartment complexes are filled with these guest workers, stores are full of guest workers since many Americans can’t afford to shop after being fired, training their replacements (here and offshore in India). It is as clear as can be what is going on-wake up!

    Both the republicans and democrats are primarily concerned with making their corporate financial backers happy with loose immigration policy. All the noise around the Mexican border is just the excuse they both use to bring cheap labor (think India) to the US. We can’t have Central and South American’s getting all the low paying jobs, and have Indian’s taking all the white collar jobs, while American’s continue to be pushed to the side. Our representatives say they love America, but they seem to hate Americans.

  • [Avatar for Kyle Lyles]
    Kyle Lyles
    March 22, 2016 12:59 pm

    A group of 22 tech workers met w/Cruz in Sioux City, IA back in October to lay out our concerns. He carefully listened, accepted our data which he said isn’t presented in DC, or if it is, gets buried in the massive pro-H1B data.

    He agreed with us at face value, promised to have his staff research and ask us follow up questions. Not long after, this was a result: https://normsaysno.wordpress.com/2015/12/12/dream-not-dream-act/
    I think Ted recognized the truth, and acted on it. Did he use timing in his benefit? Sure! But he has NOT flip flopped since. And more importantly, he KILLS OPT which is much worse than the rotten H1B.

    Trump on the other hand, chose H1B as a hot issue due to the SoCal Edison and Disney news and has flip flopped on it like a fish in the bottom of Mitt Romney’s boat. Why would anyone believe him?