Patent Market Trends and the Key Factors Impacting Patent Valuation

By Gene Quinn
March 26, 2017

Financial valuation button with business hand on blurred backgroundThe value of a patent or a patent portfolio in the broader patent market, for better or worse, is in some very basic way related to the likelihood that it can be successfully monetized. No matter how interesting or groundbreaking the innovation, patent value is a function of monetization potential, and monetization potential is dependent upon the enforceability of a patent in litigation. For whatever reason, if a patent is not likely capable of being enforced it presents no real risk and cannot be monetized for anything other than pure nuisance value.

Even under the best of circumstances the value of any one patent, not to mention the combined value of an entire patent portfolio, is often shrouded in mystery. The lack of transparency associated with reporting on IP transactions can frustrate even the best attempts to identify market norms, which leads to high profile outlying events sometimes being disproportionately weighed by those not intimately familiar with the business side of the patent marketplace.

Further confounding matters is the ever shifting IP law and policy landscape in the US, which has caused an uptick in patenting activities in Europe and China, as well as fresh looks at foreign markets and foreign patent portfolios. The changing landscape in America has altered business models and monetization strategies associated patents worldwide.

But there is some good news. While patent portfolios are entering the market other patent portfolios continue to leave the market having been purchased. Asking prices seem to have also reached an equilibrium point, according to Kent Richardson of the ROL Group. There are buyers on the market looking for good portfolios, both tech companies who themselves have thin patent portfolios who are looking to back-fill their portfolios. Some non-practicing entities that had previously left the market have also started to come back as buyers over the last 12 to 18 months, at least kicking tires and strategically acquiring where the assets are strong and the price is right.

Meanwhile, U.S. based Unicorns, which are Silicon Valley based start-up companies that have a valuation in excess of $1 billion, continue to have few patent assets. According to research done by Efrat Kasznik at Foresight Valuation Group, a full 30% of U.S. Unicorns have no patent assets at all, while another 21% have fewer than 5 patent assets. Eventually, if these Unicorns succeed there will come a time when they will almost certainly need to acquire patents. That was the case with LinkedIn and Twitter, for example. Both LinkedIn and Twitter had small patent portfolios relative to the industry and ultimately were forced to buy patents. But have these Unicorns missed the best patent buyers market we have seen in more than a generation? Will patent requirements for these Unicorns begin to drive value up?


The Author

Gene Quinn

Gene Quinn is a Patent Attorney and Editor and President & CEO ofIPWatchdog, Inc.. Gene founded in 1999. Gene is also a principal lecturer in the PLI Patent Bar Review Course and Of Counsel to the law firm of Berenato & White, LLC. Gene’s specialty is in the area of strategic patent consulting, patent application drafting and patent prosecution. He consults with attorneys facing peculiar procedural issues at the Patent Office, advises investors and executives on patent law changes and pending litigation matters, and works with start-up businesses throughout the United States and around the world, primarily dealing with software and computer related innovations. is admitted to practice law in New Hampshire, is a Registered Patent Attorney and is also admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. CLICK HERE to send Gene a message.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently No Comments comments.