Girl Scouts File Trademark Complaint Against Rival Boy Scouts

By Tiffani Otey & Phil Gura
December 27, 2018

The Girl Scouts of the United States of America have filed suit to force the Boy Scouts of America to put the “Boy” back into “Boy Scout.” The two venerable youth organizations will soon face off in a high-stakes trademark battle in federal court (click here to read the full complaint).  The Girl Scouts filed a trademark complaint in November 2018 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In it, the Girl Scouts claim the Boy Scouts’ use of the trademarks SCOUTS, SCOUTING and SCOUTS BSA without the word “boy” for programming for girls has and will continue to create confusion for families seeking to enroll their daughters in Girl Scouts.

In October 2017, the Boy Scouts announced it would begin admitting girls into its traditional enrichment programming.  The decision to admit girls reverses the Boy Scouts’ century-long focus on single-gender programming.  It also comes on the heels of other significant changes, including a 2013 decision to admit gay scouts and a 2015 decision to allow LGBTQ scout leaders.

Girl Scouts officials reacted strongly to the news that the Boy Scouts would begin programming for girls. In a letter to her Boy Scouts’ counterpart, Girl Scouts National President Kathy Hopinkah Hannan said it was “unsettling that BSA would seek to upend a paradigm that has served both boys and girls so well through the years by moving forward with a plan that would result in fundamentally undercutting Girl Scouts of the USA.”  It appears that the final straw for the Girls Scouts was the recent launch by the Boy Scouts of a marketing campaign targeted to girls, featuring the tagline “Scout Me In,” along with the reveal that the Boys Scouts program for middle and high school age girls and boys would rebrand as SCOUTS BSA.

The crux of the Girl Scouts’ claims is that their organization owns the exclusive right to use the trademark SCOUT (and variations) for enrichment programing for girls, and that the Boy Scouts’ use of the terms in connection with enrichment programming for girls violates the Girl Scouts organization’s trademark rights.  According to the complaint, use by the Boy Scouts of SCOUTS in connection with programming for girls will do more than create consumer confusion. “It will also marginalize the GIRL SCOUTS Movement by causing the public to believe that [the Girl Scouts’] extraordinarily successful services are not true or official ‘Scouting’ programs, but niche services with limited utility and appeal,” attorneys for the Girl Scouts write in the complaint.

In the complaint, attorneys for the Girl Scouts also shared various promotional materials that they say create confusion in the marketplace. For example, a Boy Scout troop in Texas created an online sign-up form for “Boys/Girls Scouts of America.” Other troops in New York and Washington State announced plans to form “Girl Scout BSA Troops.” Numerous such examples are listed in the complaint.

The Girl Scouts also accuse the Boy Scouts of intentionally confusing and misleading families about the Boy Scouts’ new programming in order to increase girl enrollment.  In particular, the Girl Scouts accuse the Boy Scouts of attempts to prevent Girl Scout troops from obtaining booth space for recruiting members in at least one marketplace and of telling parents in one community “there are no more Girl Scouts.”

The Girl Scouts’ legal position is at once a nuanced parsing of trademark rights in the SCOUT trademark (and its variations) and a straightforward application of the principle that two organizations can own rights in the same trademark for different services.  The Girl Scouts admit that the Boy Scouts have the right to use the SCOUT trademark, but only in connection with programming for boys.  In its request for relief, the Girl Scouts ask the court to order the Boy Scouts to always use another distinctive word in front of “Scouts” when referencing programs for girls.

Ultimately, the court will have to decide whether the Girl Scouts indeed have the exclusive right to use SCOUT as a trademark for enrichment programming for girls.  Past written admissions by the Boy Scouts in letters to the Girl Scouts, along with a past Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceeding in which the Boy Scouts admitted that the Girl Scouts own this to use SCOUT with programming for girls, may prove challenging for the Boy Scouts to overcome.

The Boy Scouts has yet to file its response to the suit and it is safe to assume that it will “be prepared” to defend its outreach to girls.  Whatever the legal arguments, there is more at stake in this case than the right to call a troop of kids “Scouts.” Although the two organizations have long been bedrocks of American society, they are both struggling to remain relevant  in an age where gender roles are being redefined and when kids spend a lot more time in front of the glow of a screen than a campfire.  The Boy Scouts of America reported 2.3 million youth members in 2016, a decline from 2.8 million in 2012. In the early 1970s, Boy Scout membership topped six million. Likewise, Girl Scout membership has dropped by 27 percent since 2003. According to a Wall Street Journal report, Boy Scouts’ leadership is considering filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, as the organization faces significant legal bills over the handling of sexual abuse claims.

From an organizational perspective, both organizations are looking to maintain and grow their membership.  Whereas in the past, the two organizations might have been seen as complementary of one another’s purposes, the Boy Scouts’ decision to enroll girls in its programs traditionally offered to boys positions the Boy Scouts and the Girl Scouts as direct competitors.  The outcome of this case may determine which of these organizations is able to pull out of the declining membership trend and maintain its legacy into the future.

The Author

Tiffani Otey

Tiffani Otey is an is a Trademark Attorney in Womble Bond Dickinson's Winston-Salen, NC Office. Her experience includes all aspects of trademark protection, from selection of an available trademark, to protection of that mark under the applicable federal and common laws, to enforcement of that mark against infringements and unauthorized uses.

For more information or to contact Tiffani, please visit her Firm Profile Page.

Tiffani Otey

Phil Gura is Of Counsel with Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP. Phil Gura has more than 30 years of experience helping companies manage privacy, data security, governance and regulatory compliance challenges. For the past 15 years, he has served as the Chief Legal Officer of major corporations, including Merchant Customer Exchange LLC (MCX), RaceTrac Petroleum Inc. and LaRoche Industries, Inc.

For more information or to contact Phil, please visit his Firm Profile Page.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 1 Comment comments.

  1. Tigger February 14, 2019 5:55 pm

    How about girl scouts reform themselves to not pimp out girls for just selling cookies, and teach the girls real world values and skill sets like the boy scouts. Seems the BSA has to change itself because GSA is not changing their programs for today’s youth.