The Problem of IPR Infringement in India’s Burgeoning Startup Ecosystem

“In 2019, where the startup space is more crowded than ever, it is natural that India’s ecosystem will be rife with IPR infringement cases. This incessant problem is exemplified by the litany of cases presented in front of the high courts, with almost 50% of all IP litigation cases being trademark infringement cases.”

The Problem of IPR Infringement in India’s Burgeoning Startup Ecosystem https://depositphotos.com/55027841/stock-photo-india-economy-concept.htmlFor a country of 1.3 billion people who pride themselves on ingenuity, entrepreneurial spirit, and innovative thinking, a significant percentage of the Indian population is woefully unaware of trademark infringement and intellectual property theft.

At the beginning of 2010, the Indian e-commerce scene was still in its nascent stage but within the next five years, the growth was unprecedented. This was a result of the rapid internet access proliferation combined with the telecom boom. The budget phone segment and the affordable data tariff pushed the tier-II and tier-III cities into the fore. Just to put things in perspective, according to recent studies, there are close to 600 million phone users in India with over 300 million smartphone owners, which is just 20 million shy of the population of the United States (as per 2018 records).

With a sizeable portion of the population heavily consuming online media and transacting digitally, there is a huge market for service providers and aggregators. Leveraging the demand for such service providers, startups from all over the country have mushroomed in a frenzy. Under the current government, initiatives like “Make In India” and “Startup India” have further bolstered the growth of these SMEs.

[[Advertisement]]

A Fledgling IP Regime

With these startups and SMEs contributing a substantial share to the country’s GDP, one would think the country would have a strong intellectual property system in place. Surprisingly, that is not the case. In fact, in 2019, India was placed 36th out of 50 shortlisted countries in the International Intellectual Property Index, scoring a low 16.22 out of 45 identifiers. With the administration taking conclusive steps in reducing the duration for trademark review and addressing pending IP rights (IPR) applications, India’s 2019 IP Index ranking is up a bit from 44th in 2018. The eight-point jump is certainly good news, but there is still a long way to go and a lot of frameworks to be improved before India can score in the upper echelons of the global IP Index.

The persistent problem of trademark infringement and failure to exercise IP rights also arises from the lack of education when it comes to IPR practices. A vast majority of the startups are so caught up with ideation, execution and growth hacking that patenting and trademarking often goes under the radar. The negligence towards IPR and trademark filing later comes home to roost in the form of copycats imitating a company’s trade name or a variant of it, cyber/domain squatting, widespread confusion about the actual service provider, and bearing the brunt of negative customer feedback aimed at a copycat. In 2019, where the startup space is more crowded than ever, it is natural that the ecosystem will be rife with IPR infringement cases. Competitors who try to leach off of the goodwill of an established brand by posing to be similar, opt for deceptively similar-sounding names or brand logo design. This incessant problem plaguing the Indian startup ecosystem is exemplified by the litany of cases presented in front of the high courts, with almost 50% of all IP litigation cases being trademark infringement cases.

Recent Cases

Following the announcement of the National IPR Policy in 2016, along with subsequent improvements in the overall IP regime of the country, a lot of trademark infringement cases have come into the light. A notable few are:

  • India’s most renowned e-commerce marketplace, Flipkart, came under fire from Electric appliance manufacturer Marc Enterprises, which accused the former of naming its private label MarQ, which sounds similar to the latter’s brand name. Earlier in the year, a footwear chain by the name of Metro Shoes filed a trademark infringement case against Flipkart’s private label of Metronaut.
  • The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of GrabOn in a trademark infringement decree against GrabOnRent. Hyderabad-based coupons and deals marketplace GrabOn faced off with Bangalore-based rental platform GrabOnRent, in a case where GrabOn accused the rental company of using the former’s goodwill for its own profit and even targeting the branded keywords on Google AdWords. The coupons startup opined that it has been facing all the negative reviews originally intended for GrabOnRent, which adversely impacted the brand’s trustworthiness.The founder of GrabOn, Ashok Reddy, spoke about the impact of such a trademark violation on his startup. “The amount of effort and monetary spend that goes into building a brand is terribly compromised in these scenarios and it has been a learning experience for me as an entrepreneur. Hopefully, this will serve as an example to the entire ecosystem about the dangers of trademark violation and IPR encroachment.”The decree demands GrabOnRent pay damages to GrabOn and place a disclaimer on each and every webpage/mobile app stating the rental platform has no relation whatsoever with GrabOn. The court further instructed GrabOnRent to remove all articles (viz. visiting cards, tags, labels etc.) containing the trademark ‘GrabOnRent’  by July 31, 2020.
  • MakeMyTrip, one of India’s biggest online travel aggregators, had to file a case against five copycat companies whose brand name and logo were deceptively similar to the defendant’s. MakeMyTrip pled that the domain squatting combined with trademark infringement and confusing the user would hurt the integrity of the original service provider.
  • The Delhi High court fined popular insurance aggregator PolicyBazaar a hefty INR 1 million after hidden facts about a trademark infringement case against the general insurance provider, Acko resurfaced.

The need of the hour is user education pertaining to filing patents and trademarks to protect the startup’s intellectual property. Brands have to actively participate in discussions with IP law firms at every phase of development of the service or product, be it ideation, production, execution or growth phase. Despite all the challenges, the future, however, seems promising as more and more companies realize the importance of IPR and pitfalls of trademark violation.

Image Source: Deposit Photos
Image ID: 55027841
Copyright: eabff 

The Author

Thehasin Nazia

Thehasin Nazia is Outreach Specialist -Seo and Content team at GrabOn.

Thehasin Nazia

Rajarshi Choudhuri is a Content Strategist by day, Vigilante Foodie by night, and a keen startup enthusiast.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently No Comments comments. Join the discussion.

Post a Comment

Respectfully add to the discussion.

Name *
Email *
Website