Iancu Updates Users on Filing Stats Amid Pandemic During IPO Annual Meeting Address

By IPWatchdog
September 22, 2020

In his address to the Intellectual Property Owners Virtual Annual Meeting yesterday, USPTO Director Andrei Iancu said that, despite sharp declines in filings and renewals, COVID-19 seems to have spurred innovation in some areas.

“Small and micro entity patent filings are at a historic high, with more than 112,000 filed during the first 11 months of fiscal year 2020,” Iancu said.

In an August interview with IPWatchdog Founder and CEO Gene Quinn, Iancu discussed one of the COVID-19 relief programs the Office has instituted to support small inventors during the pandemic. A pilot that offers free prioritization of COVID-19 related patent applications has been working well, Iancu told Quinn, and is expressly geared to assisting smaller entities.

The USPTO’s latest effort to help spur innovation during the pandemic was announced last week in the form of a pilot program in which patent applicants of all sizes filing provisional applications that cover inventions related to COVID-19 may be able to defer payment for those application filings if inventors agree to allow the USPTO to disclose their technical subject matter on the agency’s website.

In his remarks to IPO, Iancu provided the following most current statistics on the patent side:

  • Through the end of August 2020, serialized patent filings are 0.1% above fiscal year 2019 filings for the same time period. Before the pandemic, the Office expected an increase of 2.5% this year.
  • RCE filings are currently 10.4% below fiscal year 2019 through the end of August.
  • These declines are expected to continue into next year.
  • Patent maintenance fee collections were 4.1% lower—or $19.5 million less—than projected.

As for trademarks:

  • Through the end of August 2020, trademark filings are 3.2% above filings for the same period last year and slightly higher than expected.
  • August 2020 was the “biggest filing month yet, with 76,400 classes. We should see more than 700,000 classes for the year.”
    Trademark renewals have been lower than expected, and a decrease in collection of $12.3 million is projected.
  • “As the mix of filers shifts more towards pro se, one-time filers, and foreign filers, we expect lower trademarks renewal rates in the future.”

In addition to highlighting recent initiatives such as the Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program, the Legal Experience and Advancement Program (LEAP) and the National Council for Expanding Innovation, Iancu went on to tout the Office’s work to decrease uncertainty on Section 101 and to better balance post grant proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board by closing loopholes that allow for multiple repeat petitions and harmonizing claim construction standards.

“IPRs and PGRs were meant to be a cheaper, faster alternative to District Court litigation,” Iancu said, adding: “They were not meant to create more expensive, prolonged, and duplicative litigation. By reducing multiple bites at the apple, these changes have worked remarkably well and have brought much-needed balance to our post-grant proceedings. They have helped return the U.S. patent system to the top levels of worldwide rankings.”

Iancu’s full remarks are available here.

 

 

The Author

IPWatchdog

IPWatchdog

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Discuss this

There are currently 3 Comments comments. Join the discussion.

  1. Pro Say September 22, 2020 6:05 pm

    Hats off to the hard-working Director and his colleagues for their various innovation-positive changes and initiatives.

    That said; “be[ing] able to defer payment for those application filings if inventors agree to allow the USPTO to disclose their technical subject matter on the agency’s website.” ; given the numerous voracious national and international companies / entities only too happy to steal such innovations; carries a risk far greater than any payment deferral benefit.

    Early disclosure is especially risky for micro and small entities; who often don’t have the many millions it will take to protect such innovations once their patent/s issue.

    To say nothing of the Mayo innovation torpedo risk . . .

  2. Anon September 22, 2020 8:31 pm

    Pro Say,

    One need but look at, understand and compare the US Sovereign Quid Pro Quo with the Quid Pro Quo offered by other Sovereigns.

    Hint: the US exchange was not a publication for mere chance at a patent with full legal property rights.

  3. PTO-indentured September 23, 2020 11:40 am

    But wait! Isn’t it precisely these micro entities and small entities innovators that need to be pigeonholed as the next troll-myth — spelled: ‘NPE’?

    If these ‘entities’ are not properly lower-classed in a prevalent double-standard (patent-neutering) system, how in the world can we expect our precious few (10?) oligarch-tech co.s to subsist?

    Forget the other 100K U.S. companies hiring the most U.S. citizens. Always remember Big is Best.

    Keep IP enforcement in the new-and-improved $3M to $4M ante-up range, and 90%+ NPEs (and their ‘patents’) will go away.

    We need to be firm with these ‘Non’ upstarts and keep our on-going Whack a Mole approach in place, lest this class of so-called ‘innovators’ makes U.S. innovation strong again. Beware.

    NPE? Think: ‘No-Patent-Entity’.

    The battle isn’t won until each NPE patent (of worth) is undone.

    We need our stalwart ‘Double Standard’ (Golden Goose) system.

Post a Comment

Respectfully add to the discussion.

Name *
Email *
Website