Tillis Blasts FDA for Refusing to Respond on Drug Patent Data Study

“Yesterday’s letter indicates that members of Tillis’ staff have been told that the FDA refuses to reply, which Tillis said he finds ‘unacceptable.'”

https://depositphotos.com/4116968/stock-photo-please-respond-sign-isolated.htmlSenator Thom Tillis yesterday wrote to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf, asking for a third time that the FDA conduct “an independent assessment and analysis of the sources and data that are being relied upon by those advocating for patent-based solutions to drug pricing.” Tillis expressed his frustration with the lack of response thus far, explaining that no formal reply has yet been received despite his first letter being sent in January 2022, and calling it “unacceptable” that the FDA apparently “refuses to reply to emails or to engage.”

Tillis’ initial letter was sent following a Policy Memo published by Professor Adam Mossoff in January, titled “Unreliable Data Have Infected the Policy Debates Over Drug Patents,” which targeted the Initiative for Medicines, Access & Knowledge (I-MAK), an advocacy organization that has become a “principal, go-to source” for data on the number of patents and patent applications covering pharmaceutical innovations.

According to Mossoff, I-MAK’s database of patents covering key drugs, and reports like Overpatented, Overpriced and America’s Bestselling Drugs of 2019, which are often cited by academics, including in law journals, policymakers and in congressional hearings, are flawed, and the vast discrepancy between the I-MAK and government data cannot be explained because I-MAK does not disclose or explain its underlying dataset, making its numbers “impossible to confirm.”

In his January 31 letter, Tillis wrote to I-MAK’s Tahir Amin, as well as then-Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, expressing his concerns that the I-MAK data has created a “false narrative” that mischaracterizes patents as the source of high drug prices. In the letter to the FDA, he expressed his hope that an independent study of I-MAK’s sources could be completed by December 31, 2022. He asked Amin for “a detailed explanation of your methodology for calculating the number of patents on a drug product that could be replicable by other researchers.” I-MAK replied in March.

Tillis then wrote to the FDA again in April, supplementing his January letter with additional information based on I-MAK’s responses, which he said were not constructive and “instead largely repeated the same explanations it employs in its reports.” In that letter, Tillis asked for a response from the FDA by May 1, 2022, but has yet to receive one.

Yesterday’s letter indicates that members of Tillis’ staff have been told that the FDA refuses to reply, which Tillis said he finds “unacceptable.” He added: “Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated as having this valuable information before we begin a new Congress will ensure that lawmakers are armed with all of the key facts and the data needed to make sound public policy decisions regarding drug pricing.” He updated his deadline for a response to both the January and April letters to July 13, 2022.

Image Source: Deposit Photos
Author: dcwcreations
Image ID: 4116968 

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.

Join the Discussion

2 comments so far. Add my comment.

  • [Avatar for Anon]
    Anon
    June 24, 2022 01:50 pm

    As I noted on the I-MAK “defending response” blog thread:

    Anon

    March 9, 2022 06:26 pm

    While I find myself in direct agreement with the statement of, “Ultimately, I-MAK said in its letter, the issues raised by Tillis could be solved if Congress would require full transparency from the pharmaceutical industry.

    the Mossoff rebuttal is dead on point.

    The adage “Lead by Example” would be not only the best response to the Tillis letter, it would be the only appropriate response.

    I-MAK refuses to do what it asks for others.

    That form of PC has never sat well with me.

  • [Avatar for Pro Say]
    Pro Say
    June 23, 2022 08:22 pm

    My prediction:

    The FDA will comply (as they should) when h.e.l.l. freezes over.

    If not later.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published.