James Edwards
James Edwards
consults on intellectual property, health care innovation, and regulatory and policy issues. Edwards advises companies, trade associations, and conservative organizations on patent policy and is Co-Director of the Inventor's Project. He participates in the Medical Device Manufacturers Association's Patent Working Group. Edwards mentors start-ups and early-stage companies, largely in the med tech space, and is involved in several IP-centric projects.
Edwards served as Legislative Director to Rep. Ed Bryant, R-Tenn., then a member of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, and handled IP legislative matters. Edwards also worked on the staffs of Rep. John Duncan, R-Tenn., the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C. In addition, he was an association executive at the Healthcare Leadership Council. Edwards earned a Ph.D. at the University of Tennessee, and bachelor's and master's degrees at the University of Georgia.
Posts by James Edwards
Commenters on Bayh-Dole Rule Object to Mention of ‘Pricing’ in March-In Provision
Box Score on the New Madison Approach to Antitrust and Patents
Eagle Forum Event Focuses on IP, Antitrust Nexus
The FTC Should Give Up Its Doomed Fight with Qualcomm and Adopt Delrahim’s New Madison Approach
Property Rights and State AGs’ Assault on Remdesivir: A Conservative Perspective
The Covered Business Methods Program Must Finally Be Laid to Rest
Conservative Leaders Rebut Proposed Denial of Exclusivity on COVID Meds
Facilitating Innovation to Fight Coronavirus Act— Legislation That’s a Mixed Bag
We Won’t Stop Coronavirus Without IP
Integrity, Quality and Secure IP Rights Are Standard-Essential
Restoring IP Rights After the Destructive, Unjust Antitrust Rendering in FTC v. Qualcomm
Invest Pic v. SAP America, Inc. Amicus Brief Takes on CAFC’s ‘Physical Realm’ Test
Dangers Lie in U.S. Government’s Conflicted Actions Toward Qualcomm, Huawei
Exclusion of Patent Infringing iPhones Delayed Is Justice Denied
ITC’s Chance to Restore Reason and the Public Interest in the Qualcomm v. Apple Case
