John Battaglia
John Battaglia s an accomplished first-chair trial lawyer, appellate lawyer, and former US Justice Department lawyer who has successfully tried to verdict a broad array of civil and criminal cases. While the subject matter of his cases over the past 22-plus years has ranged from immigration to intellectual property, from guns, drugs, and violence to advanced electrical engineering, pharmaceuticals, and ice-hockey equipment, Mr. Battaglia's area of particular interest and expertise is patent litigation. Mr. Battaglia has successfully argued cases before the U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Federal, Second, Sixth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits. He argued and prevailed in In re Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litig. (Fed. Cir. 2015), a case involving numerous adverse issues and the first Federal Circuit case to address the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Teva v. Sandoz. For that victory, the legal press dubbed Mr. Battaglia and his team a "Legal Lion."
Posts by John Battaglia
Federal Circuit Reflections, 2020: The Good and (Mostly) Bad
The Price of Paice and Complexity: Rules, Standards and Facts for Post-Judgment Royalty Consideration
AAM v. Neapco Misreads Federal Circuit Precedent to Create a New Section 101 Enablement-like Legal Requirement – Part II
New Enablement-Like Requirements for 101 Eligibility: AAM v. Neapco Takes the Case Law Out of Context, and Too Far – Part I
An Emerging Section 101 Expansion to Section 112(a) Enablement? The Federal Circuit Should Stop It Now
Bilski and Its Expansion of the Abstract Idea Exception: A Failure to Define
It Is Time to Fix the Courts’ Section 101 Tests on ‘Directed to …’ and ‘Abstract Ideas’—Whether in Chamberlain or Beyond (Part II)
It Is Time to Fix the Courts’ Section 101 Tests on ‘Directed to …’ and ‘Abstract Ideas’—Whether in Chamberlain or Beyond (Part I)
Flaws in the Supreme Court’s §101 Precedent and Available Ways to Correct Them
Pandemics and the Need for U.S. Patent Laws That ‘Promote … Progress’ and Invention: The Federal Circuit, En Banc, Can Fix This
On Claim Construction, Predictability, and Patent Law Consistency: The Federal Circuit Needs to Vote En Banc
