IPWatchdog.com is in the process of transitioning to a newer version of our website. Please be patient with us while we work out all the kinks.

Hyunseok Park Image

Hyunseok Park

is an associate in Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical Group of Sughrue Mion, PLLC. He focuses his practice on patent prosecution, litigation, and client counseling, primarily in the chemical, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology areas.

For more information or to contact Mr. Park, please visit his Firm Bio Page.

Recent Articles by Hyunseok Park

Parties Agreement to Settle Issues Does Not Extinguish Board’s Ability to Determine Patentability

However, what if the Board refuses to terminate an IPR despite a joint request by both parties based on a settlement and proceeds to a final written decision? As indicated in Section 317, a joint request for termination may not be granted if the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed. Although the section does not specifically list or explain the criteria for determining the merits of the proceeding to a final written decision, there are cases providing us with a number of considerations… From the cases above, it can be seen that even when the Board terminates an IPR as to a petitioner, it may nevertheless proceed to a final written decision when the trial issues have been fully briefed and argued at the time the parties move to terminate an IPR. The Board may also proceed to a decision on the merits when there is a large number of existing district court cases involving the patent at issue.